Bahrain warns Iran against meddling in its affairs

[Banu Umayyah]

This leads me to an unresolved question. Why did Arab countries betray their "protector of the Eastern Gate" (Saddam Hussein) and Iraq, which is a Muslim Arab country?

Because Kuwaiti leaders are stupid backstabbers. Their existence depends on playing regional powers against eachother.

 

[Surenas]

Iran should deal with his own problems, rather than meddling in conflicts that won't benefit the people who lives in Iran. They should create jobs, help the economy and improve the human rights in the country. Nobody can take a country serious when they speak about human rights, while in their own country about everything in every sector is wrong.

 

[IranZamin]

Iran should deal with his own problems, rather than meddling in conflicts that won't benefit the people who lives in Iran. They should create jobs, help the economy and improve the human rights in the country. Nobody can take a country serious when they speak about human rights, while in their own country about everything in every sector is wrong.

You just talked about the United States ?

 

[RayKalm]

Iran should deal with his own problems, rather than meddling in conflicts that won't benefit the people who lives in Iran. They should create jobs, help the economy and improve the human rights in the country. Nobody can take a country serious when they speak about human rights, while in their own country about everything in every sector is wrong.

While I agree that Iran has every right to develop nuclear energy and even weapons if it wants to (ignoring their NPT status), I'd have to agree with what you've listed here. Iran does try to reach for issues beyond it's capabilities. It strongly stands for the freedom of the Palestinians, yet doesn't give her own people freedom.

But that said, people are suffering in Iran due to their pursuit of nuclear energy, which, they don't really need, since they have more than one way to get the energy they want.

 

[Abii]

^^That goes to show your intelligence level. You did not even read what you replied to.

I don't deal with Al Qaeda sympathizers.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

Because Kuwaiti leaders are stupid backstabbers. Their existence depends on playing regional powers against eachother.

I agree that they are Venomous, but that doesn't mean Saddam wasn't arrogant, ruthless, and stupid. His decision to invade Kuwait tore Arab nation apart, what a mistake that was!.

 

[raptor22]

I agree that they are Venomous, but that doesn't mean Saddam wasn't arrogant, ruthless, and stupid. His decision to invade Kuwait tore Arab nation apart, what a mistake that was!.

As it appears history repeats itself . Most of the Arab leaders are exactly what ,you're saying about Sadam .And in addition be careful the number of your mistakes is getting increased day by day .

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

As it appears history repeats itself . Most of the Arab leaders are exactly what ,you're saying about Sadam .And in addition be careful the number of your mistakes is getting increased day by day .

We were talking about an era that's so over now, the only Arab regime going to be toppiled down is the Syrian one, what next, it could move gradually to the East. The coming days will tell everything.

 

[Banglar Lathial]

Because Kuwaiti leaders are stupid backstabbers. Their existence depends on playing regional powers against eachother.

Could you tell us more? Is not Kuwait a part of the Gulf Cooperation Council? Is not Kuwait an ally of USA and Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar and other 'allies' of America? Did any Arab leaders speak out openly against these Kuwaiti leaders?

Also what are your opinions on Qatar's regime that allows the largest American airbase in the region against Iraq and other Muslims?

While I agree that Iran has every right to develop nuclear energy and even weapons if it wants to (ignoring their NPT status), I'd have to agree with what you've listed here. Iran does try to reach for issues beyond it's capabilities. It strongly stands for the freedom of the Palestinians, yet doesn't give her own people freedom.

But that said, people are suffering in Iran due to their pursuit of nuclear energy, which, they don't really need, since they have more than one way to get the energy they want.

Sir, the second part of your post is factually incorrect. Americans shot down Iranian civilian airlines long before they started barking about Iran's nuclear programme. Even if Iran cut all relations with so called "Hezbollah" (as Khatami offered to do during his tenure), the devil-in-chief (i.e. USA) never accepted this. You should consult with other informed Iranians on this matter.

If today Iran gives up on its nuclear programme, tomorrow they will target its chemical programmes, then its missile programme, then its scientists and the list will continue until Iran is taken over by them. I respect the Iranian nation's support for their nuclear programme even if it develops nuclear bombs to keep Zionist-American axis at bay.

The Arab world should also develop nuclear weapons, ICBM, nuclear powered submarines with SLBMs ready for launch at the USA. It's the fault of the Arab world as a whole that their politicians have always let them down.

 

[Banu Umayyah]

I agree that they are Venomous, but that doesn't mean Saddam wasn't arrogant, ruthless, and stupid. His decision to invade Kuwait tore Arab nation apart, what a mistake that was!.

Your right, his stupidity started even before that, invasion of Iran, invasion of Kuwait, not allowing international inspectors, civil war and so on. Ba'thism is the embodiment of evil specially in Syria. That being said, I think we should annex Kuwait even by force if necessary!
Sykes–Picot will expire in 4 years, time to draw new maps

 

[Banu Umayyah]

Could you tell us more? Is not Kuwait a part of the Gulf Cooperation Council? Is not Kuwait an ally of USA and Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar and other 'allies' of America? Did any Arab leaders speak out openly against these Kuwaiti leaders?

Also what are your opinions on Qatar's regime that allows the largest American airbase in the region against Iraq and other Muslims?

Well, SA had no bad intention for Iraq whatsoever, when he was planning to invade Kuwait he wanted to sign a non aggression treaty with us, we said "no, no need for these treaties between friends", when he invaded Kuwait Iraqi radio played a tape every 2 hours saying"Saudi brothers don't listen to Zionist and Americans , we will not do anything against SA", Kuwait on the other hand as soon as the Iraq-Iran war ended and Iraq was broke, they very much increased oil production to lower oil prices and which was devastating to Iraq, they were also stealing Iraqi oil, all of that under orders from US. So, they are sneaky bastards, and Saddam was a foolish idiot for falling for it.

Al-Thanis(Qatar) are worst than Al-Sabah, a recording with Qaddafi was released a few months ago, where their foreign secretary was conspiring with Qaddafi on brining down SA and breaking it apart, just because we sided with the father when the current Emir dethroned his own father in 95. Now, I think they are starting to mature slowly.

 

[Banglar Lathial]

Well, SA had no bad intention for Iraq whatsoever, when he was planning to invade Kuwait he wanted to sign a non aggression treaty with us, we said "no, no need for these treaties between friends", when he invaded Kuwait Iraqi radio played a tape every 2 hours saying"Saudi brothers don't listen to Zionist and Americans , we will not do anything against SA", Kuwait on the other hand as soon as the Iraq-Iran war ended and Iraq was broke, they very much increased oil production to lower oil prices and which was devastating to Iraq, they were also stealing Iraqi oil, all of that under orders from US. So, they are sneaky bastards, and Saddam was a foolish idiot for falling for it.

Al-Thanis(Qatar) are worst than Al-Sabah, a recording with Qaddafi was released a few months ago, where their foreign secretary was conspiring with Qaddafi on brining down SA and breaking it apart, just because we sided with the father when the current Emir dethroned his own father in 95. Now, I think they are starting to mature slowly.

Thank you for the very informative post. It once again shows that these fake kingdoms created by Britain have harmed the Muslim Arabs in the recent decades more than they helped anybody in the region. These 'kings' are mostly busy with plotting how to pit one Muslim country against another to weaken them at the order of the Americans, only to be betrayed by the Americans when they want it.

Are not Qatar and Kuwait important "allies" of the Saudi and other GCC countries' monarchs? Also, is not it true that Saddam Hussein claimed Kuwait is the 19th province of Iraq based on historical records? What was the Saudi reaction when Saddam Hussein's forces reached some Saudi town, probably Khafji?

All in all, it seems clear that all these Arab infighting and deviation away from the Sunnah of the Prophet (PBUH) is the real reason for the miseries faced by millions of innocent Muslim Arabs in recent years.

Your right, his stupidity started even before that, invasion of Iran, invasion of Kuwait, not allowing international inspectors, civil war and so on. Ba'thism is the embodiment of evil specially in Syria. That being said, I think we should annex Kuwait even by force if necessary!
Sykes–Picot will expire in 4 years, time to draw new maps

I wish all the Arab Muslim countries can begin forming the Islamic Khilafah, then other Muslim countries can join. At least, the Arab countries speak the same language so they understand each other a little better than the rest of the Muslim countries which have little interaction with one another.

 

[Banu Umayyah]

Are not Qatar and Kuwait important "allies" of the Saudi and other GCC countries' monarchs? Also, is not it true that Saddam Hussein claimed Kuwait is the 19th province of Iraq based on historical records? What was the Saudi reaction when Saddam Hussein's forces reached some Saudi town, probably Khafji?

Allies are people you can count on, so it doesn't apply to them. The general rule is that monarchies for the most part will focus on maintaining their own power, at the same time stability is needed in the region, so a constitutional monarchy is probably the best way to go for GCC.
As for Khafji, we were in war before he invaded he took it and they was kicked out 2 days later.

 

[Banglar Lathial]

Allies are people you can count on, so it doesn't apply to them. The general rule is that monarchies for the most part will focus on maintaining their own power, at the same time stability is needed in the region, so a constitutional monarchy is probably the best way to go for GCC.
As for Khafji, we were in war before he invaded he took it and they was kicked out 2 days later.

I think I understand the precarious situation of the GCC Arabs a little better now. Although you know the faults of the current system, you are probably worried about the intention of your enemies if a revolution takes place and your countries are left with no popular government. At the same time, the GCC Arabs need to ensure that the monarchs don't use this excuse to do whatever they wish. It's a difficult balancing act for the citizens of the GCC.