Backtracking: India says no helicopters used in 'surgical strikes'

[hussain0216]

Without proof? Are you guys really that gullible?

Have you never met indians?

 

[Dazzler]

Troopers walked 10 hours to take out a target 2km from LOC which could easily been hit by an artillery strike....

Way to go india

Precisely, there are plans with loopholes and than we have bollywood scripts like the one our neighbors have been beating for the last few days.

Some in our neighborhood are willing to go any stretch to prove their point, no matter how ridiculous they look, leaving this poor chap way behind...

 

[kempe]

Surgical strikes: India is said to have kept America in the loop
http://ecoti.in/M0vM-Z via @economictimes

US, India military relationship is the closest ever: Ashton Carter
http://ecoti.in/4mFM7a via @economictimes

 

[SrNair]

Without proof? Are you guys really that gullible?

Your media and establishments showed the proof .
You said 14 soldiers died ,that was the biggest one ,inadvertently your people said that IA did surgical strike .
14 no was a lie because in India you cant hide the supreme sacrifice of soldiers ,otherwise media will dig it out and prosecute the IA &GoI in public..
Had it been a fake attempt ,your people would have been rubbished this claim,nor we invite envoys of 25 nations to brief
the situations

It seem our Indian members have now starting to admit that their forces never crossed border now that is amusing. Next time ask your Army that before they come up with a big lie at least use Kabir Khan and Saif Ali Khan and my babe Katrina Kaif for writing the script and than stick to that story.
@Arsalan @Abu Zolfiqar

PA knows it all .More than everyone else including you.

 

[Sliver]

This is the indo Pak border & LOC from space;

View attachment 339456 View attachment 339457

No mans land and each side has mined their side..

This is the worlds most militarised border on the planet..

Hostilities are on going .. Pak is subsequently conducting .. Massive Air (HIGH MARK -- uses all Pak assets countrywide),PASSEX with Iranian Navy ex... Joint ex Drozhba 2016 with Russians and another on the indo Pak border...


Did you expect the Fukin world to believe that 4 chopper (again backtracked from the claim)... Indian troops crossed the border went inside Pakistani territory .. Conducted an operation for 4 Fukin hours at 5-6 different places without Pakistan knowing ?


What we insiders can confirm is that india has conducted heavy mobilisation of troops meanwhile our troops started aggressive patrolling ...

At night a patrolling party of 8th NLI and heavy presence of Indian controls confronted eachother...2 casualties on our side ..

8 on indian and 1 captured..apart from that arty duels took place .. Pakistan released footage of 3 Indian posts being destroyed by heavy fire..


india has provided no detail nor their pathetic media has even questioned the narrative of their army... India has given no proof or evidence or even details of the so called "strike"... Not even the areas where they "allegedly" conducted "surgical strikes"..


And have backtracked from their own statements several times..



Invisible underwear and flying carpets... Also also used ancient Hindu black magic to kill 20000 people.

Those pics are of the Intl border. the Line of Control is not the International Border. if that were so, you wouldnt have the infiltrations and skirmishes reported both sides.

 

[Zarvan]

Your media and establishments showed the proof .
You said 14 soldiers died ,that was the biggest one ,inadvertently your people said that IA did surgical strike .
14 no was a lie because in India you cant hide the supreme sacrifice of soldiers ,otherwise media will dig it out and prosecute the IA &GoI in public..
Had it been a fake attempt ,your people would have been rubbished this claim,nor we invite envoys of 25 nations to brief
the situations



PA knows it all .More than everyone else including you.

Yes PA knows it and told this to public that you never crossed border only thing you did was fired from your side which resulted in death of our two soldiers. Although you planned surgical strikes but ISI came to know about this days ago so couple of days back we send the signal that we know your plans and that is why you only resorted to cross border fire and mortar shelling. So now at least tell your public the meaning of the surgical strike other wise your media will keep fooling your people

 

[danger007]

View attachment 339407


Just a day after the Indian government claimed that its army carried out “surgical strikes” inside Pakistan with the support of military choppers, a senior Indian minister retracted the claim saying “these did not involve any aerial operations.”

“There were no aerial strikes,” Indian Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, himself an ex-Indian Army man, told The Hindu during an interview.

Rathore said the Indian Army crossed the Line of Control (LoC) “on the ground” for carrying out what he termed were “pre-emptive strikes”. “That is not like crossing the international border.”

On Thursday, soon after the Indian military claimed that it had carried out “surgical strikes” against perceived “terrorist launch pads” on the Pakistani side of the LoC in disputed Kashmir region, the Pakistani Army ripped to shreds the Indian farcical claim as an “illusion being deliberately generated by the Indians to create false effects”.

Rathore’s remarks appeared to endorse the version of the army’s media wing, ISPR, which insisted: “there has been no surgical strike by India, instead there had been cross-border fire initiated and conducted by India.”

While Indian media grossly exaggerated New Delhi’s claim the Pakistani media, however, questioned its authenticity.

The Indian Express had called it a “defining moment” but said the government must now be vigilant to ensure that the “clamour for more” did not fuel an escalation in hostilities.

The Hindustan Times welcomed the strikes in an editorial headlined “Befitting response”, and said India would “take satisfaction from the revenge, served cold”.

The Indian army provided little insight as to how the entire operation was conducted. The media there, however, said the operation was a combination of heliborne and ground forces. Special forces were para-dropped for the operation, it added. It said alleged terror launch pads targeted were in the range of 2- 3 kilometres from the LoC.

Some Indian news websites, which mentioned the use of helicopters in the operation:

The Economic Times

View attachment 339406


http://tribune.com.pk/story/1191350/backtracking-india-says-no-helicopters-used-surgical-strikes/


View attachment 339408


Well, things are getting clear

@Areesh @Dazzler @Windjammer @Side-Winder @DESERT FIGHTER @Bratva

Wow so Aerial strikes means para drops... lolz.. New meaning for Aerial strikes.. and everyone followed you blindly ..

 

[kempe]

Surgical strikes: India is said to have kept America in the loop
http://ecoti.in/M0vM-Z via @economictimes

US, India military relationship is the closest ever: Ashton Carter
http://ecoti.in/4mFM7a via @economictimes


Uncle Sam helped India jam Pak Radars !! Interesting

https://twitter.com/x/status/781871847549710337

https://twitter.com/x/status/781877068388769792

Top Jewish body writes to PM Narendra Modi on Uri attack -
Top Jewish body writes to PM Modi on Uri attack. Not many will be able to decipher this message

http://www.ecoti.in/FtCgxb !! Interesting Times

 

[Tipu7]

Wow so Aerial strikes means para drops... lolz.. New meaning for Aerial strikes.. and everyone followed you blindly ..

wao, you responded with out reading the article.
Read article and find words ''helicopter'' in it

 

[Rank]

Just look at the statement of DGMO and IA .
Rest of the items are media creation

Niar sahab you DGMO not mention anywhere that he did surgical strikes (CROSS BORDER) he didn't use the word Cross border or in P O K except (ALONG) LOC.

So if along LOC then how this operation become "Surgical Strikes" ? lol
So if raided into PAkistan yehi sawaal hey border cross kiya kesay ? lol
Yahan walay reevreyaan laga kar bhetay thay ? fence kay baad mines aur mines kay baad ALERT LVL 5 pe bheti fauj soo rahe the ?

eek Fauji aap ke SENA ka hamaray paas hey... woh cross kartay pakra jata hey likin itne bare surgical strikes hogaye aur pata b nahe laga

Aap kafi samajdaar hain zara rooshni daliye ispe wih b Philips wali

 

[SrNair]

Yes PA knows it and told this to public that you never crossed border only thing you did was fired from your side which resulted in death of our two soldiers. Although you planned surgical strikes but ISI came to know about this days ago so couple of days back we send the signal that we know your plans and that is why you only resorted to cross border fire and mortar shelling. So now at least tell your public the meaning of the surgical strike other wise your media will keep fooling your people

Read my rest of the posts ,you can under stand if your are unbiased

Niar sahab you DGMO not mention anywhere that he did surgical strikes (CROSS BORDER) he didn't use the word Cross border or in P O K except (ALONG) LOC.

So if along LOC then how this operation become "Surgical Strikes" ? lol
So if raided into PAkistan yehi sawaal hey border cross kiya kesay ? lol
Yahan walay reevreyaan laga kar bhetay thay ? fence kay baad mines aur mines kay baad ALERT LVL 5 pe bheti fauj soo rahe the ?

eek Fauji aap ke SENA ka hamaray paas hey... woh cross kartay pakra jata hey likin itne bare surgical strikes hogaye aur pata b nahe laga

Aap kafi samajdaar hain zara rooshni daliye ispe wih b Philips wali

Surgical strikes against terror hideouts along the LOC .We know where would be that hideout.Certainly not inside of heavily guarded India.

 

[danger007]

wao, you responded with out reading the article.
Read article and find words ''helicopter'' in it

No aerial strike .. doesn'tmean no para drop..

 

[Tipu7]

No aerial s

Answer this question

Surgical strikes against terror hideouts along the LOC .We know where would be that hideout.Certainly not inside of heavily guarded India.

Do you know what is meant by ''Surgical strike''?
Do you know Indian stance is now changed from ''surgical strikes'' to ''preemptive strike'?
Which in near time will change into ''no strike''............?

 

[WaLeEdK2]

Answer this question

View attachment 339475


Do you know what is meant by ''Surgical strike''?
Do you know Indian stance is now changed from ''surgical strikes'' to ''preemptive strike'?
Which in near time will change into ''no strike''............?

This is para-dropping

But they got dropped off in Indian land by helicopter. Funny story

 

[$@rJen]

View attachment 339407


Just a day after the Indian government claimed that its army carried out “surgical strikes” inside Pakistan with the support of military choppers, a senior Indian minister retracted the claim saying “these did not involve any aerial operations.”

“There were no aerial strikes,” Indian Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, himself an ex-Indian Army man, told The Hindu during an interview.

Rathore said the Indian Army crossed the Line of Control (LoC) “on the ground” for carrying out what he termed were “pre-emptive strikes”. “That is not like crossing the international border.”

On Thursday, soon after the Indian military claimed that it had carried out “surgical strikes” against perceived “terrorist launch pads” on the Pakistani side of the LoC in disputed Kashmir region, the Pakistani Army ripped to shreds the Indian farcical claim as an “illusion being deliberately generated by the Indians to create false effects”.

Rathore’s remarks appeared to endorse the version of the army’s media wing, ISPR, which insisted: “there has been no surgical strike by India, instead there had been cross-border fire initiated and conducted by India.”

While Indian media grossly exaggerated New Delhi’s claim the Pakistani media, however, questioned its authenticity.

The Indian Express had called it a “defining moment” but said the government must now be vigilant to ensure that the “clamour for more” did not fuel an escalation in hostilities.

The Hindustan Times welcomed the strikes in an editorial headlined “Befitting response”, and said India would “take satisfaction from the revenge, served cold”.

The Indian army provided little insight as to how the entire operation was conducted. The media there, however, said the operation was a combination of heliborne and ground forces. Special forces were para-dropped for the operation, it added. It said alleged terror launch pads targeted were in the range of 2- 3 kilometres from the LoC.

Some Indian news websites, which mentioned the use of helicopters in the operation:

The Economic Times

View attachment 339406


http://tribune.com.pk/story/1191350/backtracking-india-says-no-helicopters-used-surgical-strikes/


View attachment 339408


Well, things are getting clear

@Areesh @Dazzler @Windjammer @Side-Winder @DESERT FIGHTER @Bratva

When did the army said.... they used helis!!!

I feel so sorry for this people.... army never said they para dropped or used helis... its the media..... why do u op3n threads on whatever media says and blame it on the army!??? Have you had no education? ??