Aslan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2009
- Messages
- 4,551
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
No, Jains are not Hindus
Ok fair enough but then what their affiliation to the dispute.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, Jains are not Hindus
Can some one tell me/Us that why the land was split 3 ways I understand the hindus and Muslims being the party to it, what about the Jains.
Also are the Jains not hindus and if they are why use their sect and not the religion that they belong to.
Can some one tell me/Us that why the land was split 3 ways I understand the hindus and Muslims being the party to it, what about the Jains.
Also are the Jains not hindus and if they are why use their sect and not the religion that they belong to.
Also are the Jains not hindus and if they are why use their sect and not the religion that they belong to.
Some Jain member can enlighten us further.
It would have been far more fair if the court had given the land to custody of the government for construction of a hospital instead of accepting the belief on religious grounds of Hindus which even could not prove if ram was born there or not.
Not sure where the Jains come in the lawsuit. Can someone throw some light on this? I'm sure none of us who are talking here know ANYTHING aboiut the civil suit.
However Jains are NOT Hindu.
Jains are not hindus,They are a different religion though we both share more than 95% of the traditions.
Some Jain member can enlighten us further.
Why should people rejoice when they are attacked, wronged, stolen from and then thrown the leftovers after 18 years of an uphill struggle.
The Babri masjid was attacked and demolished by a MOB with no court order to back them. This in itself was an illegal act. Before anything else can be discussed or decided, this injustice must be reversed. This court has made a mockery of justice by snatching 2/3rds of the land of the mosque and meting out no punishment on the mob that not only destroyed the mosque but also caused the deaths of 900 people.
If someone did this to your house or your place of worship, would you rejoice? Or is your standard for muslim indians such that you require them to "rejoice" in the injustice being handed out to them, while you expect nothing but unfair dividends to accrue to the perpetrators of this crime.
Ok fair enough but then what their affiliation to the dispute.
A 3 Judge Bench at the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court today passed the verdict in the 60 year old Ayodhya title suit case. The Bench comprising of Justices S.U. Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D.V. Sharma heard over 70 counsels in the case.
The main counsels in the title issue are advocate Zafaryab Jilani who is the lead counsel for the Sunni Board who has been fighting this legal battle since its inception and Mahant Bhaskar Das, who represents Nirmohi Akhada, the oldest petitioner in the title suit. Other big names who are involved in the suit at the Supreme Court are Senior Counsels Soli Sorabjee, Krishnan Venugopal among several others.
Ayodhya: Allahabad High Court?s verdict expected any time; Summary of the case so far