This is the problem ,you don't accept reality.
What i stated is the reality . And let me make it clear i don't think its wrong on the part of Muslims and Christians to prefer secularity.
My point is that you should take into account this inherent attitude of the minorities while assessing their sentiments and not remain in denial.
Anyways minorities may have equal rights in this country , but Hindus have bigger responsibleness when comes to preserver and protect India and its unique identity.
Manas, leaving aside the Baba Ramdev episode, the fact of the matter is that Hindus themselves don't like RSS and political Hinduism or religion based politics on the most part. That is why they don't come to power. So why do you need to put this on minorities? Try to distinguish political religious nationalism and traditional religious leaders which everyone appreciates because they don't use religion for political purposes.
Political Islamic groups are similarly rejected by majority Muslims as well. In fact, even in neighboring Pakistan, religious parties didn't even get double digit vote share. It was only during dictatorships that the loud political Islamic parties would be given govt. role.
And there is some misconception about sharia. It applies ONLY to Muslims first of all. These rules don't apply to non-Muslims even in Muslim majority states. For example, Alcohol drinking and trading is allowed for non-Muslims in Pakistan for example. Similar is the case of Muslim Personal Law for example. It applies only to Muslims. And even that is up to the individual. If a particular Muslim wants to use common law then there is no legal way to stop him.
On the other hand, most minorities have accepted some Hindu religious laws in deference to their feelings. For example, accepting the ban on Cow slaughter or the ban on Alcohol in Gujarat. In UP for example, where this is more prominent, Deoband seminary came out with a ruling that the law of the land should be followed and in deference of religious feelings of Hindus, a sacrificial animal other than Cows should be slaughtered.
Also, as a nation we have to decide weather we want religious leaders to be decision makers or weather they should stick to their areas of expertise i.e. religion. Political religious politics, whether by Muslims, Christians or Hindus will create problems in the long run. But of course, the majority community is the main community that has to understand this. This does not mean, that religious leaders cannot take part in politics, but that they should use religion as a means to gain political party. In fact, you don't even have to be a religiously devout person to play the religious politics game. And most who do so are actually NOT religiously devout.
There is no two minds on fighting or not fighting corruption. Everyone wants to do that. The question is wether someone is cynically using the genuine grievances for ulterior motives. And it is on the Baba Ramdev to clarify that because of some credible questions raised here. Is this a political agitation targeting only the Congress - then clearly state that. If it is truly an apolitical anti-corruption agitation, atleast give 5% of the time to corruption done by other parties including the BJP of which there are several examples.
The reason why Anna Hazare has more credibility among the masses is because he has shown to be apolitical. He has taken on corruption in other states including Gujarat as well (
Gujarat is riddled with scams, says Anna Hazare : West: India Today).
We need a apolitical movement that puts ALL political parties under pressure to do away with Corruption, otherwise we will see Congress go and another party come and break new records in Corruption as they keep playing musical chairs. No party should be spared.