What's new

Azerbaijan Issues Warning Iran

Status
Not open for further replies.
. . .
To end the history stealing...


Scythian, also called Scyth, Saka,and Sacae, member of a nomadic people, originally of Iranian stock, known from as early as the 9th century bce who migrated westward from Central Asia to southern Russia and Ukraine in the 8th and 7th centuries bce. The Scythians founded a rich, powerful empire centred on what is now Crimea. The empire survived for several centuries before succumbing to the Sarmatians during the period from the 4th century bce to the 2nd century ce


The Encyclopædia Britannica (Latin for "British Encyclopaedia"), published by Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., is a general knowledge English-language encyclopaedia. It is written by about 100 full-time editors and more than 4,000 contributors, who have included 110 Nobel Prize winners and five American presidents. The 2010 version of the 15th edition, which spans 32 volumes and 32,640 pages, was the last printed edition; digital content and distribution has continued since then.


Quick facts: Author, Illustrator ...
The Britannica is the oldest English-language encyclopaedia still in production. It was first published between 1768 and 1771 in the Scottish capital of Edinburgh, as three volumes.

Flamer trolls came from porsian section, lock their neckles so they cannot bark here

About Yenisei scrips;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Turkic_alphabet
Good. Your source is saying it's from 8th century... Just as I said.
Issyk inscription is about 1200 years older. Thanks for proving what I said. Lol.
 
.
.
http://s155239215.onlinehome.us/turkic/31Alphabet/Amanjolov/AmanjolovIssykInscriptionEn.htm

"The oldest inscription in Türkic alphabet, the Issyk Inscription, written on a flat silver drinking cup, was found in 1970 in a royal tomb located within Balykchy ( Issyk), a town in Kyrgyzstan near Lake Issyk, and was dated by 5-th c. BC. "


:omghaha:
Lol amanjolov from Kazachstan, not credible. Old Turkic alphabet is not older than 8th century, that's what the great majority of scholars agree on. Amanjolov or unknown figures are not credible.

The linguistic history of the Turkic languages can be followed in written sources from the 8th century on. Attempts at interpreting earlier materials as Turkic (e.g., the identification of Hunnic elements in Chinese sources from the 4th century ce) have failed.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Turkic-languages#ref618042


Now we have amanjolov and senturk fighting against 4000 scholars (110 noble prize winners) from brittanica.

Lol
 
.
They(Mullahs) are intentionally trolling in order to force the moderator @cabatli_53 into closing the thread.

Unfortunately, some Turks here help them for this.

Turks have ruled many nations for centuries, not by force it continued for centuries, but dominance of Turk civilization over those nations, however, Turks have never had asimilation policy of other nations, for example Greeks who are seen as epicenter of western civlization would today speak Turkish and embrace the Islam, the same goes for some other 30 countries that were founded after ottoman Turk ruling.

Turks of Azerbaijan and South Azerbaijan is the first degree brother of Turks of Turkey, therefore historically have been supported by Turkey in the region of Turan that covers the northern sides of Iran that is the minority in the region and almost inside the border.

the role of persians under Turk ruling are even now to be predicted when looking at the approach of today's persians in their speech: Hate, denial, insult.
 
Last edited:
.
Discussion with a turk...

"Hahahahaha" instead of giving a credible source.
@Kuwaiti Girl @2800 @Serpentine


Name, source, year of publication? From which institution?
Thanks in advance.
He already told you.

The name of his source is "hahaha".

Secularism goes beyond naming a state religion or not, if there are religious courts making decisions in a country then it isnt secular simple as that.
Syria's secular from a legal point of view.
 
.
Bernard-Lewis-Plan-2011.jpg

Maybe something like this.

I've read the number of Turks in Iran from various sources. The numbers really varies alot, one extreme I recall was almost 42 million Turkic population in Iran. I'm not sure about the real numbers but I believe something between 25-35 million which I guess is around 30-45%, nothing to be underestimated. Could be a real threat to Iran.
 
.
Bernard-Lewis-Plan-2011.jpg

Maybe something like this.

I've read the number of Turks in Iran from various sources. The numbers really varies alot, one extreme I recall was almost 42 million Turkic population in Iran. I'm not sure about the real numbers but I believe something between 25-35 million which I guess is around 30-45%, nothing to be underestimated. Could be a real threat to Iran.
I have a more accurate map.

gZOW9PW.png


Don't you agree, @Serpentine?
 
. . .
A YouTube clip. Our greatest danger/enemy is YouTube. Iran is now 9 parts because of this clip.
I understand your frustration about that. Though, you didn't respond my question, will you change your profile picture?
 
.
I understand your frustration about that. Though, you didn't respond my question, will you change your profile picture?
I feel save. Ofcourse I wont remove my heritage. If you like Iranic culture, history you're allowed to use pictures of scythians.
 
.
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom