The enormity of Awamy lie and shamelessness would even make lying war criminals, ugly owls to hide their faces in shame. But was it unexpected from those sinners when Mujib himself trespassed all moral boundaries to occupy many "Chorer Maas" to have "Boro Ghalas" just to save himself from his complicity in Agartala conspiracies? As Bengali proverb goes, "Ager Haal jemne Jay, Pisher Tao Temne Jay", alas! we are undone, mere spectators to experience Pisher ta, thanks.
Awami League turned Bangladesh justice system into Kangaroo court
- Thread starter idune
- Start date
Awami Kangaroo court now lifting case against awami leaders. Yesterday Sheikh hasina's cousin was sent to "hospital" aka backdoor release on case where he is already convicted.
-----------------------------------------------
Court lifts Obaidul Kader's tax case
A Dhaka court has withdrawn a tax evasion case against Awami League (AL) leader Obaidul Kader, reports bdnews24.com.
Judge Jasmine Anwar of special court-4 Monday ordered withdrawal of the case filed during the tenure of the military-backed interim government.
According to the case documents, Kader paid his dues to Sonali Bank in January this year.
Earlier on July 21, 2009, the government approved withdrawal of the case terming it politically driven to persecute the former state minister.
The National Board of Revenue (NBR) filed the case against the AL presidium member for evading Tk 636,000 in income tax in August 2007.
Court lifts Obaidul Kader's tax case
-----------------------------------------------
Court lifts Obaidul Kader's tax case
A Dhaka court has withdrawn a tax evasion case against Awami League (AL) leader Obaidul Kader, reports bdnews24.com.
Judge Jasmine Anwar of special court-4 Monday ordered withdrawal of the case filed during the tenure of the military-backed interim government.
According to the case documents, Kader paid his dues to Sonali Bank in January this year.
Earlier on July 21, 2009, the government approved withdrawal of the case terming it politically driven to persecute the former state minister.
The National Board of Revenue (NBR) filed the case against the AL presidium member for evading Tk 636,000 in income tax in August 2007.
Court lifts Obaidul Kader's tax case
Because SC Chief Justice did not accept Awami regime nominated murderer and thug as SC justice, Awami leadership is continuously taunting Chief Justice. Full show of Awami kangaroo justice systems are in full display.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suranjeet blames judges for turning judiciary into ‘glass house’
Staff Correspondent
Senior Awami League lawmaker Suranjit Sengupta on Tuesday accused a section of judges of turning the judiciary into a ‘glass house’, which, he said, the politicians had built as a ‘concrete structure’.
‘With every military rule there was a judge involved. Even once a sitting chief justice was made chief martial law administrator,’ he said urging all concerned to act responsibly for a sustainable democracy.
‘Judges should see their own faces in the mirror,’ Suranjeet, also the chairman of the parliamentary standing committee on law, justice and parliamentary affairs ministry, he said in response to comments of a retired chief justices of the Supreme Court last month that judiciary had turned into a ‘glass house’.
Former chief justice Mahmudul Amin Choudhury, while addressing a seminar on April 24, also accused the parliamentary committee of rebuking the judiciary over oath of two additional judges appointed to the High Court.
On this point, the committee chairman said that the legislative committee could neither appoint nor remove judges. The committee had only come up with its observation.
The question of rebuking the judiciary does not arise, Suranjit said. ‘Some of the jurists nowadays speak like politicians,’ he added.
On Mahmudul Amin’s remarks, the AL leader said that it was the judges who were responsible for turning the judiciary into a ‘glass house’ from a ‘concrete structure’.
Politicians have always fought for the dignity of the judiciary. They faced oppression and went to jail for defending constitutional rule, he said.
The chairman said his committee at a meeting on Monday recommended immediate enactment of laws that were constitutionally obligatory. He said that once these laws were in place there should be no controversy over implementation of certain constitutional provisions.
Front Page
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suranjeet blames judges for turning judiciary into ‘glass house’
Staff Correspondent
Senior Awami League lawmaker Suranjit Sengupta on Tuesday accused a section of judges of turning the judiciary into a ‘glass house’, which, he said, the politicians had built as a ‘concrete structure’.
‘With every military rule there was a judge involved. Even once a sitting chief justice was made chief martial law administrator,’ he said urging all concerned to act responsibly for a sustainable democracy.
‘Judges should see their own faces in the mirror,’ Suranjeet, also the chairman of the parliamentary standing committee on law, justice and parliamentary affairs ministry, he said in response to comments of a retired chief justices of the Supreme Court last month that judiciary had turned into a ‘glass house’.
Former chief justice Mahmudul Amin Choudhury, while addressing a seminar on April 24, also accused the parliamentary committee of rebuking the judiciary over oath of two additional judges appointed to the High Court.
On this point, the committee chairman said that the legislative committee could neither appoint nor remove judges. The committee had only come up with its observation.
The question of rebuking the judiciary does not arise, Suranjit said. ‘Some of the jurists nowadays speak like politicians,’ he added.
On Mahmudul Amin’s remarks, the AL leader said that it was the judges who were responsible for turning the judiciary into a ‘glass house’ from a ‘concrete structure’.
Politicians have always fought for the dignity of the judiciary. They faced oppression and went to jail for defending constitutional rule, he said.
The chairman said his committee at a meeting on Monday recommended immediate enactment of laws that were constitutionally obligatory. He said that once these laws were in place there should be no controversy over implementation of certain constitutional provisions.
Front Page
Using kangaroo court set up Awami regime, all corruption case against Sheikh Hasina has been dropped.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bangladesh drops leader Sheikh Hasina corruption case
Corruption charges against Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina have been dropped - the last of 15 cases she faced when she came to office in 2009.
Anti-corruption officials had accused her of wasting state money by paying for lobbying in the US during her 1996-2001 administration.
But judges ruled that the accusations did not constitute a criminal offence.
Sheikh Hasina's supporters say the criminal cases against her were politically motivated.
All 15 cases were brought between 2001 and 2008, when she was out of power.
Since she came back to power in January 2009, each one has been withdrawn by the accuser, thrown out of court or discontinued.
Her lawyer, Sheikh Fazle Noor Taposh, told Bangladeshi media that justice had been done.
"We have got fair justice, all cases have been quashed through legal procedures," he told the bdnews24 website.
The corruption case related to the appointment of a lobbyist to represent the Bangladesh Export Processing Zones Authority in Washington.
The anti-corruption agency, which filed the charges in 2001, said that as a result of the appointment, the state suffered heavy financial losses.
But the court ruled there was no evidence of any crime.
BBC News - Bangladesh drops leader Sheikh Hasina corruption case
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bangladesh drops leader Sheikh Hasina corruption case
Corruption charges against Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina have been dropped - the last of 15 cases she faced when she came to office in 2009.
Anti-corruption officials had accused her of wasting state money by paying for lobbying in the US during her 1996-2001 administration.
But judges ruled that the accusations did not constitute a criminal offence.
Sheikh Hasina's supporters say the criminal cases against her were politically motivated.
All 15 cases were brought between 2001 and 2008, when she was out of power.
Since she came back to power in January 2009, each one has been withdrawn by the accuser, thrown out of court or discontinued.
Her lawyer, Sheikh Fazle Noor Taposh, told Bangladeshi media that justice had been done.
"We have got fair justice, all cases have been quashed through legal procedures," he told the bdnews24 website.
The corruption case related to the appointment of a lobbyist to represent the Bangladesh Export Processing Zones Authority in Washington.
The anti-corruption agency, which filed the charges in 2001, said that as a result of the appointment, the state suffered heavy financial losses.
But the court ruled there was no evidence of any crime.
BBC News - Bangladesh drops leader Sheikh Hasina corruption case
Awami kangaroo court intentionally delaying the hearing to make sure Amardesh journalist who suffered already move to find another job. This way govt plan is to take over Amardesh using Awami proxy businessman.
Justice delayed justice denied.
SC to hear Amar Desh petition July 15
SC to hear Amar Desh petition July 15 | Bangladesh | bdnews24.com
Justice delayed justice denied.
SC to hear Amar Desh petition July 15
SC to hear Amar Desh petition July 15 | Bangladesh | bdnews24.com
Now Awami driven Kangaroo court don't even listen to merit of a case if Awami regime objects. When an opposition lawmakers filed an appeal for a hearing on specific provision of money laundering act, Supereme court (highest of Awami Kangaroo court) even removed the case from hearing list to entertain Awami AJ letter.
Report in Bangla:
.:. Welcome to SHEERSHANEWS.COM .:.
Report in Bangla:
.:. Welcome to SHEERSHANEWS.COM .:.
Al-zakir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 8,612
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Awami league has become really smart with how to bend the laws to implement their political agenda. They do not have gut to amend the constitution rather trying to use supreme court to replace our constitution with secularism. Awami better stay in power for eternity because when we come back to power than we will repay them with more accuracy.
I have to praise Awami league so far for it's clever ways to fool the people though would like to see how long will it last.
I have to praise Awami league so far for it's clever ways to fool the people though would like to see how long will it last.
ramu
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,372
- Reaction score
- 0
Al-zakir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 8,612
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
???
P.S: And you are an Elite member!
Why not? Do you have problem with what I said?
If Awami is using court to implement political agendas then BNP can not be blame for it if it use even more to demise Awami. It will be just fair. NO.
Another example of kangarro court and cooked up charges. I is important to know court earlier issued show cause notice to ACC on validity of its claim but Awami regime disobeying court rule went on to file another case. And awami kangaroo court judge denied bail on the case.
___________________________________________
ACC press charges against Mahmudur
Thu, Jul 15th, 2010 9:53 pm
Dhaka July 15 (bdnews24.com) The Anticorruption Commission has pressed charges against Mahmudur Rahman, acting editor of the closed Bengali daily Amar Desh, for not submitting his wealth statement within deadline.
Deputy director of the commission, Mohammad Nur Ahmed, submitted the charge sheet to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's Court of Dhaka on Thursday. The graft-busters' prosecution wing officer, Abdus Salam, confirmed bdnews24.com of the development.
Ahmed stated that Rahman had appealed to the Dhaka's First Joint District Judges' Court on April 12, challenging the legality of a notice that the anti-graft body sent on April 19. Rahman also asked an injunction upon the notice.
On June 10, ACC official Nur Ahmed, who is investigation officer, had filed the case with Gulshan police.
Dhaka metropolitan magistrate Kanika Biswas earlier rejected Rahman's bail in the same case.
Rahman has already secured bail in six out of the seven cases filed against him.
On June 2, police stormed the Amar Desh newspaper office and arrested Rahman on fraud charges brought against him by the paper's publisher Hashmat Ali Hashu, who himself was under a 'brief dramatic detention' on June 1.
On June 1, the government had stopped the publication of the newspaper and sealed off its press.
ACC press charges against Mahmudur | Bangladesh | bdnews24.com
___________________________________________
ACC press charges against Mahmudur
Thu, Jul 15th, 2010 9:53 pm
Dhaka July 15 (bdnews24.com) The Anticorruption Commission has pressed charges against Mahmudur Rahman, acting editor of the closed Bengali daily Amar Desh, for not submitting his wealth statement within deadline.
Deputy director of the commission, Mohammad Nur Ahmed, submitted the charge sheet to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's Court of Dhaka on Thursday. The graft-busters' prosecution wing officer, Abdus Salam, confirmed bdnews24.com of the development.
Ahmed stated that Rahman had appealed to the Dhaka's First Joint District Judges' Court on April 12, challenging the legality of a notice that the anti-graft body sent on April 19. Rahman also asked an injunction upon the notice.
On June 10, ACC official Nur Ahmed, who is investigation officer, had filed the case with Gulshan police.
Dhaka metropolitan magistrate Kanika Biswas earlier rejected Rahman's bail in the same case.
Rahman has already secured bail in six out of the seven cases filed against him.
On June 2, police stormed the Amar Desh newspaper office and arrested Rahman on fraud charges brought against him by the paper's publisher Hashmat Ali Hashu, who himself was under a 'brief dramatic detention' on June 1.
On June 1, the government had stopped the publication of the newspaper and sealed off its press.
ACC press charges against Mahmudur | Bangladesh | bdnews24.com
No rule of law in the country: HRC chief
Wed, Aug 11th, 2010 9:41 pm BdST
Dhaka, Aug 11 (bdnews24.com)There is no rule of law in the country, National Human Rights Commission chairman Mizanur Rahman has said.
"In addition, the rule of law is widely absent inside the judicial system," he said on Wednesday.
He was speaking at the launch of a policy paper on the judiciary at the conference room of Journalism Training & Research Institute. The event was organised by the Institute of Governance Studies, BRAC University.
Rahman said the general people think that the justice is bought with money. The law is only applicable to the poor, not the rich.
He called for widespread use of Bangla in courts. "It will benefit the poor."
He also observed that those who are politically conscious and sympathetic to the poor should be given preference in the appointment of judges.
The Institute's research associate Mohammad Sirajul Islam presented the paper. He recommended setting up of an independent authority for the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court.
An independent judicial secretariat was suggested to ensure the financial and administrative independence of the judiciary.
The BRAC University's School of Law director Shahdeen Malik said there are around 12 lakh cases pending across the country and the existing 35,000 lawyers are not enough to handle those cases, creating a huge backlog.
The Institute of Governance Studies director, Manzoor Hasan, conducted the ceremony.
No rule of law in the country: HRC chief | Bangladesh | bdnews24.com
Wed, Aug 11th, 2010 9:41 pm BdST
Dhaka, Aug 11 (bdnews24.com)There is no rule of law in the country, National Human Rights Commission chairman Mizanur Rahman has said.
"In addition, the rule of law is widely absent inside the judicial system," he said on Wednesday.
He was speaking at the launch of a policy paper on the judiciary at the conference room of Journalism Training & Research Institute. The event was organised by the Institute of Governance Studies, BRAC University.
Rahman said the general people think that the justice is bought with money. The law is only applicable to the poor, not the rich.
He called for widespread use of Bangla in courts. "It will benefit the poor."
He also observed that those who are politically conscious and sympathetic to the poor should be given preference in the appointment of judges.
The Institute's research associate Mohammad Sirajul Islam presented the paper. He recommended setting up of an independent authority for the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court.
An independent judicial secretariat was suggested to ensure the financial and administrative independence of the judiciary.
The BRAC University's School of Law director Shahdeen Malik said there are around 12 lakh cases pending across the country and the existing 35,000 lawyers are not enough to handle those cases, creating a huge backlog.
The Institute of Governance Studies director, Manzoor Hasan, conducted the ceremony.
No rule of law in the country: HRC chief | Bangladesh | bdnews24.com
Bangladesh SC court judges notch up the “kangaroo” court tile
Bangladesh Supreme Court (SC) is considering contempt case against editor and reporters of Daily Amardesh. Daily Amardesh published a report on repeated questionable actions by chamber judge of SC influenced by Attorney General . Here is the report on statements Bangladesh Supreme Court (SC) Judges made in court yesterday (18/10/2010) and ground for contempt considered by SC Judges:
1) If the report of chamber judge questionable activity true or not is NOT the consideration here. Question we (SC judges) are considering if editor was in contempt of the court by publishing the report on chamber judge questionable practice.
2) In the report editor did not use “honorable” in front of Justice Mozzammel Hossain and judges considered that to be disrespect and reason for contempt.
3) Mahmudur Rahman, defendant and acting editor of daily Amardesh came from different background (engineer, businessman and columnist) and became editor in last 2 years. According to statement by Judges, Mahmudur Rahman background does not qualify him to be editor of a newspaper and reason for him not to use “honorable”.
Amardesh Online Edition
These statements and consideration by SC judges raises some obvious questions:
These questions are raised on actions of judges who are occupying office of SC justice and NOT at the office of SC justices.
1) If telling the truth exposes how chamber judge is involved in questionable and dis-honorable practices then how publishing it can be construed as "contempt"?
2) And if telling the truth is considered contempt then what these judges are defending? Truth or abuse of power?
3) Is it another way of saying even if judges are involved in questionable practice no one should or can talk about it?
4) Is there a law saying not adding “honorable” before name of a judge means disrespect and is a contemptible offense?
5) In US and elsewhere it is common practice to address a judge as “Justice xyz”. So how and when adding “honorable” before name of a judge became a yardstick for journalistic acumen?
6) Since when any judges are entitled to determine and make judgement on qualification of newspaper editor? Are Bangladesh SC judges not abusing sweeping power of their office?
Honor is something can only be earned and cannot be imposed. Honorable is implied with the institution of SC judges. But they way Bangladesh SC justices are imposing more of a colonial norm of respect they are further denigrating their honor.
(Further analysis later...)
Bangladesh Supreme Court (SC) is considering contempt case against editor and reporters of Daily Amardesh. Daily Amardesh published a report on repeated questionable actions by chamber judge of SC influenced by Attorney General . Here is the report on statements Bangladesh Supreme Court (SC) Judges made in court yesterday (18/10/2010) and ground for contempt considered by SC Judges:
1) If the report of chamber judge questionable activity true or not is NOT the consideration here. Question we (SC judges) are considering if editor was in contempt of the court by publishing the report on chamber judge questionable practice.
2) In the report editor did not use “honorable” in front of Justice Mozzammel Hossain and judges considered that to be disrespect and reason for contempt.
3) Mahmudur Rahman, defendant and acting editor of daily Amardesh came from different background (engineer, businessman and columnist) and became editor in last 2 years. According to statement by Judges, Mahmudur Rahman background does not qualify him to be editor of a newspaper and reason for him not to use “honorable”.
Amardesh Online Edition
These statements and consideration by SC judges raises some obvious questions:
These questions are raised on actions of judges who are occupying office of SC justice and NOT at the office of SC justices.
1) If telling the truth exposes how chamber judge is involved in questionable and dis-honorable practices then how publishing it can be construed as "contempt"?
2) And if telling the truth is considered contempt then what these judges are defending? Truth or abuse of power?
3) Is it another way of saying even if judges are involved in questionable practice no one should or can talk about it?
4) Is there a law saying not adding “honorable” before name of a judge means disrespect and is a contemptible offense?
5) In US and elsewhere it is common practice to address a judge as “Justice xyz”. So how and when adding “honorable” before name of a judge became a yardstick for journalistic acumen?
6) Since when any judges are entitled to determine and make judgement on qualification of newspaper editor? Are Bangladesh SC judges not abusing sweeping power of their office?
Honor is something can only be earned and cannot be imposed. Honorable is implied with the institution of SC judges. But they way Bangladesh SC justices are imposing more of a colonial norm of respect they are further denigrating their honor.
(Further analysis later...)
Last edited:
Throwing a one liner to block news that don't swit Indians is a pattern here. But here comes Idune again,
Bangladesh SC court judges notch up the kangaroo court tile
Bangladesh Supreme Court (SC) is considering contempt case against editor and reporters of Daily Amardesh. Daily Amardesh published a report on repeated questionable actions by chamber judge of SC influenced by Attorney General . Here is the report on statements Bangladesh Supreme Court (SC) Judges made in court yesterday (18/10/2010) and ground for contempt considered by SC Judges:
1) If the report of chamber judge questionable activity true or not is NOT the consideration here. Question we (SC judges) are considering if editor was in contempt of the court by publishing the report on chamber judge questionable practice.
2) In the report editor did not use honorable in front of Justice Mozzammel Hossain and judges considered that to be disrespect and reason for contempt.
3) Mahmudur Rahman, defendant and acting editor of daily Amardesh came from different background (engineer, businessman and columnist) and became editor in last 2 years. According to statement by Judges, Mahmudur Rahman background does not qualify him to be editor of a newspaper and reason for him not to use honorable.
Amardesh Online Edition
These statements and consideration by SC judges raises some obvious questions:
These questions are raised on actions of judges who are occupying office of SC justice and NOT at the office of SC justices.
1) If telling the truth exposes how chamber judge is involved in questionable and dis-honorable practices then how publishing it can be construed as "contempt"?
2) And if telling the truth is considered contempt then what these judges are defending? Truth or abuse of power?
3) Is it another way of saying even if judges are involved in questionable practice no one should or can talk about it?
4) Is there a law saying not adding honorable before name of a judge means disrespect and is a contemptible offense?
5) In US and elsewhere it is common practice to address a judge as Justice xyz. So how and when adding honorable before name of a judge became a yardstick for journalistic acumen?
6) Since when any judges are entitled to determine and make judgement on qualification of newspaper editor? Are Bangladesh SC judges not abusing sweeping power of their office?
Honor is something can only be earned and cannot be imposed. Honorable is implied with the institution of SC judges. But they way Bangladesh SC justices are imposing more of a colonial norm of respect they are further denigrating their honor.
(Further analysis later...)
The magnitude of the shameless ness of AWAMY-Malaun-Rapists have reached to a point that even Iblis (Rah) would probably hide his face by seeing them. In one hand they have arrested JI's Dhaka city Amir without any warrant or specific charges(The Daily Sangram || Oldest bangla daily newspaper) whereas cleared known terrorists Iqbal, Shawn's names from their absolute complicities in murders(Amardesh Online Edition) by other. And people acting like 'Camels in sand storm' that has been described nicely in the article at bracket(::Welcome to Daily Naya Diganta::).
Similar threads
