What's new

Auto Policy 2016-21 Unable to Bring Any Change in Auto Industry As Yet

Max Pain

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 14, 2014
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
AutoPolicy_Unable-752x440.jpg

After a hiatus of almost two and half years, the economic co-ordination committee of the cabinet gave the go-ahead to the automotive development policy 2016-21 back in March 2016. Now almost one year has been passed but no material/ significant result or achievement can be seen after implementation of this policy on the horizon of automobile industry of Pakistan.

The 24th meeting of the Auto Industry Development Committee was held on 13th April 2017. The issues discussed and decision made during this meeting does indicate the incapability of new auto policy in delivering solutions for the challenges being faced by the automobile industry of Pakistan.

Primary objective of the policy was to bring new investment which could boost the competition among the players, resultantly consumer shall get due benefits. The Government itself was hopeful that the policy will attract the European Car maker. However definition of medium knocked-down kits (MKD) was not included into the policy so leading European Car makers including Fiat, Audi and Volkswagen scrapped their plans to enter Pakistan.

Related: Govt. Rejects Pak Suzuki’s Demands, Turns Down Audi’s Assembly-Only Plan

French car maker Renault was the first to announce its plans to invest USD$100 million in Ghandhara Nissan Plant to bring its brand into the country’s market but reliable source disclosed that Renault has stopped all activities in relation to Pakistan ventures due to some unknown reasons.

Under automobile development policy 2016-21 the following applications were submitted for approval.

Request of M/s. Regal Automobile Industries Limited for Green Field Investment.
M/s. Regal Automobiles Industries Ltd (RAIL) applied for the Greenfield Investment incentives under New Investment Policy of ADP 2016-21 for establishing auto assembly plant in Lahore for the production & assembly of light commercial vehicle (LCV’s) and Mini Vans/ Bus under Technology Transfer Agreement with DFSK Motor Co. Ltd, a subsidiary of Dongfeng Motors Corporation, China.

Further, it was informed that M/s. Tayyaba Motors (Pvt.) Limited, approached EDB claiming that their and M/s. RAIL’s principal is same i.e. DongfengSokon and DFSK, even their factory address and vehicles offered by both of them are physically same with the only difference of logo.

Related: Indus Motors Revealed Rs 4 Billion Investment Plan to Expand Production

The firm therefore claimed that M/s. Regal Automobile Industries Ltd., cannot avail the concessions of Greenfield Investment under ADP 2016-21 which M/s. Regal Automobiles denied. The committees decided that both the firms shall provide information of design patents from their principals and other related information facilitating EDB to evaluate and decide, accordingly.

Request of M/s. Dewan Farooque Motors Ltd for Brown Field Investment.
It was learnt by reliable sources that the ministry is not convinced with the contention of DFML that their plant was operational beyond the cutoff date of July 2013. So the approval for brown-field investment category cannot be given. It is only possible through amendment in the policy, since it is mentioned in the policy that it can only be reviewed after two years, while it is only in its first year of implementation so ministry could not support any change in the policy.

Request of M/s. Al Haj Faw Motors (Pvt) Ltd for Green Field Investment.
The request of M/s. Al Haj Faw Motors for the green field category was also turned down with the same reason. Furthermore some more new companies are establishing their assembly plants and few only announced their intention to enter in automobile assembly business under ADP 2016-21.

Related: Pak Suzuki May Shelve Its Rs.460 Billion Investment Plan

Procedure for approval under ADP 2016-21 needs to be strengthened. Stringent documentation for application process has to be adopted. Questions/ details of commercial nature may be asked by the new entrant. It may be noted that RAIL assembly plant is near completion and DFML has already imported CKD kits for Shahzore assembly from Dehan Laos. It seems that both companies could not start their assembly operations due to these confusions / delays.

The core essence of the new auto policy was to attract new comers to invest in the country, however apart from new models introduced by Pak Suzuki and inclusion of few safety features in the local assembled cars, the Auto Policy 2016-21 is yet to prove its effectiveness.
 
. .
AutoPolicy_Unable-752x440.jpg

After a hiatus of almost two and half years, the economic co-ordination committee of the cabinet gave the go-ahead to the automotive development policy 2016-21 back in March 2016. Now almost one year has been passed but no material/ significant result or achievement can be seen after implementation of this policy on the horizon of automobile industry of Pakistan.

The 24th meeting of the Auto Industry Development Committee was held on 13th April 2017. The issues discussed and decision made during this meeting does indicate the incapability of new auto policy in delivering solutions for the challenges being faced by the automobile industry of Pakistan.

Primary objective of the policy was to bring new investment which could boost the competition among the players, resultantly consumer shall get due benefits. The Government itself was hopeful that the policy will attract the European Car maker. However definition of medium knocked-down kits (MKD) was not included into the policy so leading European Car makers including Fiat, Audi and Volkswagen scrapped their plans to enter Pakistan.

Related: Govt. Rejects Pak Suzuki’s Demands, Turns Down Audi’s Assembly-Only Plan

French car maker Renault was the first to announce its plans to invest USD$100 million in Ghandhara Nissan Plant to bring its brand into the country’s market but reliable source disclosed that Renault has stopped all activities in relation to Pakistan ventures due to some unknown reasons.

Under automobile development policy 2016-21 the following applications were submitted for approval.

Request of M/s. Regal Automobile Industries Limited for Green Field Investment.
M/s. Regal Automobiles Industries Ltd (RAIL) applied for the Greenfield Investment incentives under New Investment Policy of ADP 2016-21 for establishing auto assembly plant in Lahore for the production & assembly of light commercial vehicle (LCV’s) and Mini Vans/ Bus under Technology Transfer Agreement with DFSK Motor Co. Ltd, a subsidiary of Dongfeng Motors Corporation, China.

Further, it was informed that M/s. Tayyaba Motors (Pvt.) Limited, approached EDB claiming that their and M/s. RAIL’s principal is same i.e. DongfengSokon and DFSK, even their factory address and vehicles offered by both of them are physically same with the only difference of logo.

Related: Indus Motors Revealed Rs 4 Billion Investment Plan to Expand Production

The firm therefore claimed that M/s. Regal Automobile Industries Ltd., cannot avail the concessions of Greenfield Investment under ADP 2016-21 which M/s. Regal Automobiles denied. The committees decided that both the firms shall provide information of design patents from their principals and other related information facilitating EDB to evaluate and decide, accordingly.

Request of M/s. Dewan Farooque Motors Ltd for Brown Field Investment.
It was learnt by reliable sources that the ministry is not convinced with the contention of DFML that their plant was operational beyond the cutoff date of July 2013. So the approval for brown-field investment category cannot be given. It is only possible through amendment in the policy, since it is mentioned in the policy that it can only be reviewed after two years, while it is only in its first year of implementation so ministry could not support any change in the policy.

Request of M/s. Al Haj Faw Motors (Pvt) Ltd for Green Field Investment.
The request of M/s. Al Haj Faw Motors for the green field category was also turned down with the same reason. Furthermore some more new companies are establishing their assembly plants and few only announced their intention to enter in automobile assembly business under ADP 2016-21.

Related: Pak Suzuki May Shelve Its Rs.460 Billion Investment Plan

Procedure for approval under ADP 2016-21 needs to be strengthened. Stringent documentation for application process has to be adopted. Questions/ details of commercial nature may be asked by the new entrant. It may be noted that RAIL assembly plant is near completion and DFML has already imported CKD kits for Shahzore assembly from Dehan Laos. It seems that both companies could not start their assembly operations due to these confusions / delays.

The core essence of the new auto policy was to attract new comers to invest in the country, however apart from new models introduced by Pak Suzuki and inclusion of few safety features in the local assembled cars, the Auto Policy 2016-21 is yet to prove its effectiveness.
I think Pakistan should focus on development of its local sector ... incentive should have given to motorcycle and rickshaw manufacturer to advance themselves in car manufacturing sector ... it will give a boost to local economy and will reduce burden on imports ...
 
.
AutoPolicy_Unable-752x440.jpg

After a hiatus of almost two and half years, the economic co-ordination committee of the cabinet gave the go-ahead to the automotive development policy 2016-21 back in March 2016. Now almost one year has been passed but no material/ significant result or achievement can be seen after implementation of this policy on the horizon of automobile industry of Pakistan.

The 24th meeting of the Auto Industry Development Committee was held on 13th April 2017. The issues discussed and decision made during this meeting does indicate the incapability of new auto policy in delivering solutions for the challenges being faced by the automobile industry of Pakistan.

Primary objective of the policy was to bring new investment which could boost the competition among the players, resultantly consumer shall get due benefits. The Government itself was hopeful that the policy will attract the European Car maker. However definition of medium knocked-down kits (MKD) was not included into the policy so leading European Car makers including Fiat, Audi and Volkswagen scrapped their plans to enter Pakistan.

Related: Govt. Rejects Pak Suzuki’s Demands, Turns Down Audi’s Assembly-Only Plan

French car maker Renault was the first to announce its plans to invest USD$100 million in Ghandhara Nissan Plant to bring its brand into the country’s market but reliable source disclosed that Renault has stopped all activities in relation to Pakistan ventures due to some unknown reasons.

Under automobile development policy 2016-21 the following applications were submitted for approval.

Request of M/s. Regal Automobile Industries Limited for Green Field Investment.
M/s. Regal Automobiles Industries Ltd (RAIL) applied for the Greenfield Investment incentives under New Investment Policy of ADP 2016-21 for establishing auto assembly plant in Lahore for the production & assembly of light commercial vehicle (LCV’s) and Mini Vans/ Bus under Technology Transfer Agreement with DFSK Motor Co. Ltd, a subsidiary of Dongfeng Motors Corporation, China.

Further, it was informed that M/s. Tayyaba Motors (Pvt.) Limited, approached EDB claiming that their and M/s. RAIL’s principal is same i.e. DongfengSokon and DFSK, even their factory address and vehicles offered by both of them are physically same with the only difference of logo.

Related: Indus Motors Revealed Rs 4 Billion Investment Plan to Expand Production

The firm therefore claimed that M/s. Regal Automobile Industries Ltd., cannot avail the concessions of Greenfield Investment under ADP 2016-21 which M/s. Regal Automobiles denied. The committees decided that both the firms shall provide information of design patents from their principals and other related information facilitating EDB to evaluate and decide, accordingly.

Request of M/s. Dewan Farooque Motors Ltd for Brown Field Investment.
It was learnt by reliable sources that the ministry is not convinced with the contention of DFML that their plant was operational beyond the cutoff date of July 2013. So the approval for brown-field investment category cannot be given. It is only possible through amendment in the policy, since it is mentioned in the policy that it can only be reviewed after two years, while it is only in its first year of implementation so ministry could not support any change in the policy.

Request of M/s. Al Haj Faw Motors (Pvt) Ltd for Green Field Investment.
The request of M/s. Al Haj Faw Motors for the green field category was also turned down with the same reason. Furthermore some more new companies are establishing their assembly plants and few only announced their intention to enter in automobile assembly business under ADP 2016-21.

Related: Pak Suzuki May Shelve Its Rs.460 Billion Investment Plan

Procedure for approval under ADP 2016-21 needs to be strengthened. Stringent documentation for application process has to be adopted. Questions/ details of commercial nature may be asked by the new entrant. It may be noted that RAIL assembly plant is near completion and DFML has already imported CKD kits for Shahzore assembly from Dehan Laos. It seems that both companies could not start their assembly operations due to these confusions / delays.

The core essence of the new auto policy was to attract new comers to invest in the country, however apart from new models introduced by Pak Suzuki and inclusion of few safety features in the local assembled cars, the Auto Policy 2016-21 is yet to prove its effectiveness.

This article is rehashing old news.

Brown-field investment for Dewan has been approved by EDB...but that is one part of the chain. Expect it to go through.

The other players have already started importing vehicles for testing - Nishat has imported Hyundai H1 van, Tucson SUV and H100 pickup already.
A new policy on hybrid vehicles is to be announced soon. Some players are waiting for that.
 
.
many new players are entering pakistan with local companies and statements already given by them

its take time to setup an industry the policy was introduce in 2016 and no plant can setup in just few months
 
.
[Clutch, post: 9568561, member: 10628"]I guess it's because of corruption....[/QUOTE]

Whatever maybe the reason, this isjust sad and disappointing

I think Pakistan should focus on development of its local sector ... incentive should have given to motorcycle and rickshaw manufacturer to advance themselves in car manufacturing sector ... it will give a boost to local economy and will reduce burden on imports ...
But that's not happening

This article is rehashing old news.

Brown-field investment for Dewan has been approved by EDB...but that is one part of the chain. Expect it to go through.

The other players have already started importing vehicles for testing - Nishat has imported Hyundai H1 van, Tucson SUV and H100 pickup already.
A new policy on hybrid vehicles is to be announced soon. Some players are waiting for that.
What about KIA, RENAULT and Nissan
 
.
so all the bongian by this gov were just there to tease the people? announcing so and so car maker is coming!
 
.
The useless promises and announcements need to kept alive for another year I guess, till the elections. :D
 
. .
When did the JF-17 project become part of the new auto policy? :D
 
. .
Without government approvals, how can any of these claims be regarded as "real"? Official approval is a necessary requirement for the projects to go ahead, and thus far, none have it.
 
.
When did the JF-17 project become part of the new auto policy? :D

Just saying that our very own Tarek Fateh of PDF who used to challenge people on sales of JFT has completely disappeared from that thread.

Thora wahan bhi bak do to acha ho jaye ga.
 
.
You, sir, are not only uncouth, but also a BLIND liar. :D

(read that other effing thread first!)

If PDF management were decent, you would be sanctioned for personal attacks, but they're not, and you won't be, so reading my signature should suffice. :D

============================

Back on topic on this thread, why is the government not approving new entrants that would make its new auto policy a better success?
 
Last edited:
. .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom