Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Everyone is selling something. Pakistan has no money for weapons.
We need to make hospitals and infrastructure and build our economy. Weapon systems are secondary priority right now.
If we face threat just fire one or two mini nukes to kill them all invading forces.
Water pipelines are more effective and cheapwe need to build canal system.
Russian junk is uselessJ31 or SU 35 are far better options then this decade old typhone with tht you got to buy its weapons for use , while both china and russian made jets are far more cheaper deal with a lot more coopreation insight
It is good options and we need at least two to three sdrn. So it cover only 1 sdrn and then we have to go for another 2 to make good use of this planes. Otherwise maintenance will be a nightmareToday i saw i news that Austrian government is decided to phase ourt EF 2000 due to cost factor and they don't have Enemy at their borders and eminent need of jets
Pakistan Airforce lacks in airsuperiority role and deep strike capability these 15 EF 2000 Can fullfil our needs until we get new fith generations jet and these jets will come at lesser price as second hand jets top of it they can fire any New air to air missile like IRIST MATADEOR etc which F 16 cannot yet
Top of it until we get new twin engine 5th generation jet our pilots can gain experience in twin engine jet of EF 2000 calliber and somewhat we can counter Rafale if India with this aqusation
Evn JF 17 is flying on a Russian engine, u need to study a lot about Russian tech, it's absolutely cool, in. The end its a man behind the machine and it least Russian planes comes with out coded chips in itRussian junk is useless
JF thunder has its own capabilities and even block 3 can be manufactured with the same base asemmbly line pakistan needs a long range fighter air crafts which can hit deep inside enemy, and SU 35 are the bestCan we not invest in opening a new assembly line of jf17 block 3 instead?
Can any learned brother enlighten on practicalities?
JF-17 is not for deep strike missions.I don't think they would make much difference in such low number and it would be cost prohibitive for PAF to get them in numbers that matter. For PAF quantity with "ok" quality is the way to go. JF17 blk3 is step in that direction.
Man behind the machine story does not hold up to scrutiny for long.Evn JF 17 is flying on a Russian engine, u need to study a lot about Russian tech, it's absolutely cool, in. The end its a man behind the machine and it least Russian planes comes with out coded chips in it
It does hold, and yes JF thunders are not long range fighters, when thunders shot IAF Su30 tht man behind machine theory proved itself in practicalJF-17 is not for deep strike missions.
Man behind the machine story does not hold up to scrutiny for long.
Both man and machine are important as sum of all parts.It does hold, and yes JF thunders are not long range fighters, when thunders shot IAF Su30 tht man behind machine theory proved itself in practical