What's new

Australia Considers Sending Warships to Counter China

Optimos Prime IA

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 5, 2015
Messages
1,046
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
Counter China
By Joshua Philipp, Epoch Times | May 18, 2015
Last Updated: May 18, 2015 3:32 pm
183130846-480x319.jpg

Australia's warship HMAS Leeuwin sails during the 2013 International Fleet Review in Sydney on October 5, 2013. Australia is considering sending navy ships to help challenge the Chinese regime's claims in the South China Sea. (Saeed Khan/AFP/Getty Images)

Australia may send military aircraft and ships to help the United States challenge the Chinese regime’s territorial claims in the South China Sea. The military push is being recommended by Peter Jennings, chair of the Australian prime minister’s government’s advisory panel for its annual Defense White Paper.

The recommendations from Jennings mirror a wartime strategy with China, which were included in a secret chapter of Australia’s 2009 Defense White Paper. Details from the chapter were revealed in the 2012 book by Australian journalist David Uren, “The Kingdom and the Quarry: China, Australia, Fear and Greed.”

The secret chapter outlined the Chinese regime’s military strategy for the Western Pacific. It detailed a scenario where the Chinese regime could launch a pre-emptive military strike against the United States, Japan, and Australia. The attack would include, the book said, cyber and missile attacks to blind U.S. communication and surveillance systems, and would be followed by missile attacks on U.S. naval vessels and military bases.





MORE:


In response to the rumored threat, the 2009 Defense White Paper recommended that Australia cooperate with the United States to counter the Chinese regime’s “anti-access strategy” to gain control over the South China Sea and East China Sea.

Uren wrote the chapter “focused on Australia’s ability to fight an air-sea battle alongside the United States against China. This assumed that there would be blockades distant from China designed to control its sea routes and stop the flow of natural resources on which its industrial engine depends.”

Australia would assist the United States, Uren wrote, by helping block trade routes with its submarines.

The new recommendations sound familiar to the leaked strategy from 2009. According to The Sydney Morning Herald, Jennings is recommending that Australia send military aircraft and ships to the South China Sea, in order to prevent the Chinese regime from controlling the region’s vital trade routes.


Australian naval ships replenish a United States Navy ship in the South Indian Ocean, during the search for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 on April 12, 2014. (LSIS James Whittle/Australia Department of Defence via Getty Images)

The United States recently announced it would begin sending military aircraft and ships within 12 nautical miles of the Chinese regime’s man-made islands in the South China Sea. Countries including Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines are worried the Chinese regime will begin enforcing defensive rings around its man-made islands, similar to its self-proclaimedair defense zone over the East China Sea.

The comments from Jennings come amidst disputed rumors in Australia that the United States will station additional Air Force assets in Australia, including B-1 bombers and surveillance aircraft.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported that, according to Jennings, the U.S. will have to “puncture the Chinese claims” by sending vessels and aircraft through waters and airspace claimed by the Chinese regime, and that “Australia would need to follow suit.”

“The next step after asserting our position is the simple physical demonstration of it by actually sailing through the sea and airspace,” Jennings said, according to The Sydney Morning Herald.

“If we’re serious about asserting it then we’ll have to do it, at some stage,” he said.

Australia Considers Sending Warships to Counter China
 
. . . .
anyone who posts utter trash from the likes of epoch times or wantchinatimes should automatically receive a 3 month ban. it would clean up the forum so much.
 
.
:mod: American's sheriff in Asia Pacific decide to assist the democratic and freedom loving countries in Asia to resist the influence of commie from China and Vietnam.
OMG... :usflag:
Meanwhile, the deputy sheriff is busy amend their constitution so in the future, they can company their big boss to liberate other part of the world.
 
.
Epoch Times is a mouthpiece of Falun Gong and Falun Gong is
a branch of ....voodoos sect which is banned in China and not welcome
in U.S :toast_sign:
 
.
do find it ironical pf the Chinese complaining of about "bias" publications, when their own government force feeds and brainwashes them with state run propaganda news. It's like the sheep crying " maaaaa" once too often.
 
.
A: Seeing every thing Austraila sells goes to China and it seems every thing we buy comes from there why the heck would China blockade its self from a major customer?

B: As some one with Aussie and NZ flags Hey whats with the sheep jokes ;)
 
.
Do the Yanks have the balls to approach within 12 nautical miles of Chinese shores in the SCS as the article mentions?
 
.
Australia is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the Chinese trade and investment. At best/worst they should be neutral... besides Australia is no power so projection is mere showmanship!
 
.
Australia is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the Chinese trade and investment. At best/worst they should be neutral... besides Australia is no power so projection is mere showmanship!

You are a beneficiary of America. Why don't you try that advice of not projecting for the chinese interest and for every anti american value? why are you guys even in America?

China is one the biggest beneficiary of American trade too. How come your advice is not for them?
 
.
Counter China
By Joshua Philipp, Epoch Times | May 18, 2015
Last Updated: May 18, 2015 3:32 pm
183130846-480x319.jpg

Australia's warship HMAS Leeuwin sails during the 2013 International Fleet Review in Sydney on October 5, 2013. Australia is considering sending navy ships to help challenge the Chinese regime's claims in the South China Sea. (Saeed Khan/AFP/Getty Images)

Australia may send military aircraft and ships to help the United States challenge the Chinese regime’s territorial claims in the South China Sea. The military push is being recommended by Peter Jennings, chair of the Australian prime minister’s government’s advisory panel for its annual Defense White Paper.

The recommendations from Jennings mirror a wartime strategy with China, which were included in a secret chapter of Australia’s 2009 Defense White Paper. Details from the chapter were revealed in the 2012 book by Australian journalist David Uren, “The Kingdom and the Quarry: China, Australia, Fear and Greed.”

The secret chapter outlined the Chinese regime’s military strategy for the Western Pacific. It detailed a scenario where the Chinese regime could launch a pre-emptive military strike against the United States, Japan, and Australia. The attack would include, the book said, cyber and missile attacks to blind U.S. communication and surveillance systems, and would be followed by missile attacks on U.S. naval vessels and military bases.





MORE:


In response to the rumored threat, the 2009 Defense White Paper recommended that Australia cooperate with the United States to counter the Chinese regime’s “anti-access strategy” to gain control over the South China Sea and East China Sea.

Uren wrote the chapter “focused on Australia’s ability to fight an air-sea battle alongside the United States against China. This assumed that there would be blockades distant from China designed to control its sea routes and stop the flow of natural resources on which its industrial engine depends.”

Australia would assist the United States, Uren wrote, by helping block trade routes with its submarines.

The new recommendations sound familiar to the leaked strategy from 2009. According to The Sydney Morning Herald, Jennings is recommending that Australia send military aircraft and ships to the South China Sea, in order to prevent the Chinese regime from controlling the region’s vital trade routes.


Australian naval ships replenish a United States Navy ship in the South Indian Ocean, during the search for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 on April 12, 2014. (LSIS James Whittle/Australia Department of Defence via Getty Images)

The United States recently announced it would begin sending military aircraft and ships within 12 nautical miles of the Chinese regime’s man-made islands in the South China Sea. Countries including Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines are worried the Chinese regime will begin enforcing defensive rings around its man-made islands, similar to its self-proclaimedair defense zone over the East China Sea.

The comments from Jennings come amidst disputed rumors in Australia that the United States will station additional Air Force assets in Australia, including B-1 bombers and surveillance aircraft.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported that, according to Jennings, the U.S. will have to “puncture the Chinese claims” by sending vessels and aircraft through waters and airspace claimed by the Chinese regime, and that “Australia would need to follow suit.”

“The next step after asserting our position is the simple physical demonstration of it by actually sailing through the sea and airspace,” Jennings said, according to The Sydney Morning Herald.

“If we’re serious about asserting it then we’ll have to do it, at some stage,” he said.

Australia Considers Sending Warships to Counter China
I don't understand why Australia wants to butt into these big boys fight. Australia has no stake in the SE Asia.
 
.
A: Seeing every thing Austraila sells goes to China and it seems every thing we buy comes from there why the heck would China blockade its self from a major customer?

B: As some one with Aussie and NZ flags Hey whats with the sheep jokes ;)

China and Australia is way too far to have any territorial conflict.

And for your information, mutton is delicious. :enjoy:

I don't understand why Australia wants to butt into these big boys fight. Australia has no stake in the SE Asia.

Australia may have no conflict with China. It does have conflict with Indonesia, hence the need for these.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom