What's new

AUSA 2015: Army defends high cost for up-gunned Stryker

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
1639958_-_main.jpg

Stryker flat-bottom hull. (IHS)
US Congress defence committee leaders agreed to authorise USD411 million to add heavier weapons to 81 of the US Army's Stryker wheeled personnel carriers in fiscal year 2016, and army acquisition officials defended that high per-system cost as necessary for a small and rapid procurement.

The army is working to up-gun 81 Strykers with 30 mm cannons on remote weapon systems and others with Javelin anti-tank missiles, a long-considered upgrade that was pushed through an operational need statement from the 2nd Cavalry Regiment based at Vilseck in Germany. Service leaders approved the plan in April and now testing and integration work remains.

The cost per system appears particularly high (about USD5 million per vehicle), and according to Heidi Shyu, the army's acquisition executive, this is partly schedule driven because it is through an urgent need statement that is seeking the upgrade as soon as possible. It is also for only 81 systems, so the limited quantity drives up per-unit costs. The price includes a design and integration element as well, she added.

These lethality upgrades are not for the heavier armoured Stryker Double-V Hull (DVH) vehicles, and rather are for the original flat-bottom configuration, although a Stryker engineering change proposal (ECP) effort may eventually include a 30 mm weapon for the DVH, Shyu said. "If we want more Strykers to have this capability beyond the 81 [requested in Europe], we will start a programme of record to do that," she said, noting that the cost could be lower with a procurement of thousands of units.

Want to read more? For analysis on this article and access to all our insight content, please enquire about our subscription options ihs.com/contact




To read the full article, Client Login
(278 of 307 words)

AUSA 2015: Army defends high cost for up-gunned Stryker - IHS Jane's 360
 
. . .
idiot government should just buy off the shelf Roskomak if it's going to cost $5 million per vehicle.


KTO Rosomak - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


kto-rosomak.jpg

Your goverment depends on military complex... ahem more correctly economy plus its corruption is legal thanks to lobbying. Vote for Bernie Sanders if you don't want to see same shit happen again.
 
.
Your goverment depends on military complex... ahem more correctly economy plus its corruption is legal thanks to lobbying. Vote for Bernie Sanders if you don't want to see same shit happen again.
It seems more and more like the defender of capitalism will be defeated by capitalism itself. Irony at its best.
 
.
Your goverment depends on military complex... ahem more correctly economy plus its corruption is legal thanks to lobbying. Vote for Bernie Sanders if you don't want to see same shit happen again.
Bernie "everything is free" Sanders :rofl:
 
. . .
idiot government should just buy off the shelf Roskomak if it's going to cost $5 million per vehicle.


KTO Rosomak - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


kto-rosomak.jpg
Plus the cost of another set of logistics (its a Patria)

Your goverment depends on military complex... ahem more correctly economy plus its corruption is legal thanks to lobbying. Vote for Bernie Sanders if you don't want to see same shit happen again.
Its the other ways around: defence business depends on government so sustain profits.
Defense Industry: Keep Paying Us or the Economy Dies | WIRED

U.S. Defense Industry Outperforms S&P by 100 Percent | The Fiscal Times
Five Reasons The Defense Industry Is Still A Better Investment Than Other Sectors

The American Economic Recovery and the Defense Industry | Brookings Institution
 
.
Back
Top Bottom