[ATTENTION!] Official article admits DF-21(X) has ability of attacking moving target

[Speeder 2]

Sonny...You have been severely outclassed..

Outclassed by whom? By you? In what? In "stealthy pumps"?

You ain't gots the brains to see that what I posted is only an EXAMPLE, not an exposition of what the DF-21 or the SM-3 is capable of.

"Do not unto others what you would not have them do unto you" (Confucius)

If you want to discredit Mr. Wang's remarks, again, in your "brainy" words: SM-3's testing data and locations please. No funny examples, son. You can't have it both ways.

When one of you resort to racist epithets as a comeback, no one, including YOU, has the spine to condemn what you would be so trigger happy to do against anyone else. So not only are you clueless about the subject but a coward as well.

And your "viagra" and "penis enlargement pumps" initial attacks were not racist at all ?

Yeah, I am a coward if you start to show off these 2 items.

For goodness even YOU do not need viagra and penis pumps,*ahem*, do not need them all the time, yes?


Now where are we? DF-21(X) VS ...?

 

[gambit]

Outclassed by whom? By you? In what?

Yes...You have been outclassed and yes...By me.

If you want to discredit Mr. Wang's remarks, again, in your "brainy" words: SM-3's testing data and locations please. No funny examples, son. You can't have it both ways.

Kid...Even if I do know any test data regarding the SM-3 -- zipped.

Anyway...This is not about the SM-3 or even about the DF-21. This is about a report by Mr. Wang that every Chinese fanboys claimed or believe to be definitive that the DF-21 can hit a moving target. Once we read the report, we find NOTHING to support that enthusiasm. Nothing at all. So what I did was to present to the readers an example of a general but reasonably technical explanation of how that is possible. Everyone can see the vast difference. This does not mean Mr. Wang is stupid. It simply mean the report that he gave is in no way sufficiently educational and credible to support the claim by the Chinese fanboys here that the DF-21 can hit a moving target. You are smart enough to know the difference between the two. You do not like it that someone can challenge a Chinese. You know nothing about the subject to put up a counter-challenge. So the only thing you and your pals can do is to put up pathetic insults and cheer on a racist epithet.

And your "viagra" and "penis enlargement pumps" initial attacks were not racist at all ?

Now it is clear that you are stupid. Look up the proper definition of 'racism' and related subjects.

Yeah, I am a coward

Yes indeed you are.

 

[Speeder 2]

Yes...You have been outclassed and yes...By me.

Oh of course, how big is your pump then?

Kid...

com'on, repeatedly calling others "kid" doesn't help boost your logic department which is btw the ears, unless you want justify your own age and hence those pump toys.

Even if I do know any test data regarding the SM-3 -- zipped.

You what? you zipped?

Dear readers: gambit is zipped! Now who is outclassed by whom?

hmmm...Viagra Effect, if I may guess?

So why Mr. Wang should unzip then?

Anyway...This is not about the SM-3 or even about the DF-21. This is about a report by Mr. Wang that every Chinese fanboys claimed or believe to be definitive that the DF-21 can hit a moving target. Once we read the report, we find NOTHING to support that enthusiasm. ...

No. Go read the thread title yourself, it is about DF-21.

It is you who have a grudge against what Mr. Wang claimed with your twisted logic that he should disclose testing data and locations of DF-21 to prove it, by comically raising an example of SM-3 in the same vein as an "anology", of which you gave neither testing data nor location info to prove it yourself. Now we talk about stupidity.

Now it is clear that you are stupid.

Now this is a trademark personal attack, military professional?

But don't worry, I won't report you.

Look up the proper definition of 'racism' and related subjects.

Don't bother, as I am looking at him and his "pump" right now... yeah, it's purple.

 

[ptldM3]

A little off topic but i have a question, do those pumps really work or do perverts buy them for recreational use?

 

[gambit]

A little off topic but i have a question, do those pumps really work or do perverts buy them for recreational use?

Errr...

Mr. Wang's article is like one of these pumps and as you can see it did not work in this instant.

 

[Speeder 2]

A little off topic but i have a question, do those pumps really work or do perverts buy them for recreational use?

Can't really tell , sorry...

But... it looks like that someone is busy at sharing his pumping expertise with Mr. Wang on which works and which not, doesn't it?

 

[milan]

okay...dont wanna talk about ASBM matter....just sth about the credibility and originality of the essay...coming soon...

 

[milan]

1. the original essay:

"精度实现了ccp从几百米再到几十米的进步" apparently, Mr. Wang, the Vice chief director of China aerospace science and technology Group and also allegedly the author of the essay, has made an obvious mistake. He wanna say CEP and wrote CCP instead. okay, writing mistake. but if you are really what you are (the Vice chief director of China aerospace science and technology Group), would you make such a silly mistake?

and also, the name of another honored missile expert mentioned in the essay is wrong. 黄纬禄,not 黄伟禄.

the website claims that the source of the article is China aerospace science and technology Group. well, they never bother to exam that they write or what?

 

[milan]

as new guy cant insert URL link. but GUNDAN can confirm that the original essay reads CCP, not CEP. guess GUNDAN corrected it for convenience.

and please let me continue....

2. credibility of the source. "来源:中国航天科工集团 上传:zhk " the rough translation is: "source: China aerospace science and technology Group Upload:zhk" well, who is zhk? website admin? i checked other articles of the website, all the articles are uploaded by "zhk" , "zz" and other guys with funny names like "这种" ("this kind" in Chinese). I dont know how you guys define "official", but articles like that certainly dont seem official to me.

 

[new wave]

as new guy cant insert URL link. but GUNDAN can confirm that the original essay reads CCP, not CEP. guess GUNDAN corrected it for convenience.

and please let me continue....

2. credibility of the source. "来源:中国航天科工集团 上传:zhk " the rough translation is: "source: China aerospace science and technology Group Upload:zhk" well, who is zhk? website admin? i checked other articles of the website, all the articles are uploaded by "zhk" , "zz" and other guys with funny names like "这种" ("this kind" in Chinese). I dont know how you guys define "official", but articles like that certainly dont seem official to me.

Please cut out your opinion craps, "Link" no need a URL link, just give the exact wording of the original source in English now.

 

[milan]

3. credibility of the website.

the website that originally published the essay on line is a Chinese website which pays tributes to China's old nuclear and space projects （两弹一星）, Namely nuclear bomb, hydrogen bomb and China's first satellite. The website claims that it is sponsored by China's 两弹一星 history research institute and China's defense info-tech research institute. As i know, there are lots of "research institute this and research institute that " in China. Some of these organizations ask (retired) experts to be their honored chairman or members in order to show their authenticity, basically, they are retirement clubs. I guess essays published from them cannot be called "official" though they are of some value for reference.

 

[new wave]

If not, it will be like i i tell everybody i know a lot of craps regarding your LOMO, ok.

 

[milan]

Please cut out your opinion craps, "Link" no need a URL link, just give the exact wording of the original source in English now.

well, let me try to insert a link...

w w w .ldyx.org/a/liangdanyixing/lunwenzhuanlan/2009/1228/1616. h t m l

if you cant read Chinese, then cant help.

 

[new wave]

well, let me try to insert a link...

w w w .ldyx.org/a/liangdanyixing/lunwenzhuanlan/2009/1228/1616. h t m l

if you cant read Chinese, then cant help.

Lay LOMO choi height, i said from the original source !!

 

[milan]

If not, it will be like i i tell everybody i know a lot of craps regarding your LOMO, ok.

see the link? that's the original source. you go check it yourself.