paritosh
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2008
- Messages
- 3,363
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
alright, i'll look for something to match the Hindustan Times.
dude...you should.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
alright, i'll look for something to match the Hindustan Times.
India does not have drones operating in FATA. The US does. It doesn't mean that the drone strikes are not being exploited by India though.
The instability is one thing the likes of which Mehsud can exploit, a they allow them to kill us, we kill them mindset.
Attention mods: Troll must be banned.
To the Troll: If you knew what Quran says you would have not suggested it!!!! Consider it a word of advise!!!!!
If I am incharge of RAW, I would rather focus on ensuring peace in Punjab & Sindh - why waste money & energy on destroying Pak while Talebs are doing it well.
Long term, such peace initiatives in Punjab & Sindh would pay-off better after the final partition.
By peace initiaves you mean causing problems right?
I just hope that peaceful Punjab & Sindh (after partition) would only help India.
New Recruit
Something seemed a little odd to me. Report suggests, that there was only one attacker who was pinned down by FCs and he blew himself up. Report also suggests, that gun shots were heard. Now, if there was only one terrorist then it stands to reason, that no one else was firing at the FCs. Which means that the FCs were the only ones firing.
Question is, who were they firing at and why ? Can anybody throw some light on it.
New Recruit
Thanks for clarifying.Generally when a blast or a loud explosion occurs within close proximity of armed soldiers, it is instinctive training for the soldiers (who are temporarily numbed & senseless by the impact of the explosion in such close proximity) to start firing generally at all sides in order to thwart any further aggression. Since I am located a few hundred yards from the site where this happened, I can say this with suretly that the firing pattern was more of an instinctive shoot then an actual exchange of fire between two armed groups.
Thanks for clarifying.
I am not an expert in military procedures, but still, how judicious is the practice. Firing solely on instinct, without knowing who your target is, particularly, in a civilian area (it was a market place, wasn't it ?), is akin to what is known as indiscriminate firing. Can battlefield tactics be applied in urban friendly civilian scenario ?
The Frontier Corps is a para-military force trained mainly in Guard and patrolling duties. They are not completely and professionally trained like Army special forces soldiers who can keep their senses in check with all hell exploding around them. Even in wars and during soldiers charging at each other, sporadic firing is a way of 'trying' to keep the enemy at bay! Having said that, the explosion took place 'unexpectedly' and without warning on a green belt located between two housing sectors and there was no market place around. Their is a double road adjacent to the camp which at the time had little traffic. Therefore, battlefield tactics can very well be applied in urban warfare in such incidents and locations. Having said that, normally when such 'unexpected' explosions occur in market places, random firing is not done for obvious reasons! In a battle however the nerves are hardened due to expected barrage of bullets and bombs!