Wilhelm II
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2019
- Messages
- 1,478
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Why you guys think a land with 99 percent Armenian people must be part of Azerbaijan?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It wasn't always as such. Nagorno-Karabakh was an artificial exclave in Azerbaijan, literally drawn around with a pen on a map by Soviet planners, to create an Armenian-majority location within an Azeri nation. Karabakh in its entirety was always Azeri majority. Moreover, anti-Azeri cleansing took place in both NK and other parts of Azerbaijan annexed to Yerevan (the strip of land bordering Iran for example). The Russians and Soviets actually created this mess. Azeris are taking back part of their land. That this land happens to be predominantly Armenian inhabited doesn't make it historically a viable nation or a defined exclave of Armenia. Shall we take a pen and draw on a map and make Leicester, UK an exclave of Gujarat, India just because there are more gujratis there than white English?Why you guys think a land with 99 percent Armenian people must be part of Azerbaijan?
They are different that is part of Britain but there are a government in karabakhIt wasn't always as such. Nagorno-Karabakh was an artificial exclave in Azerbaijan, literally drawn around with a pen on a map by Soviet planners, to create an Armenian-majority location within an Azeri nation. Karabakh in its entirety was always Azeri majority. Moreover, anti-Azeri cleansing took place in both NK and other parts of Azerbaijan annexed to Yerevan (the strip of land bordering Iran for example). The Russians and Soviets actually created this mess. Azeris are taking back part of their land. That this land happens to be predominantly Armenian inhabited doesn't make it historically a viable nation or a defined exclave of Armenia. Shall we take a pen and draw on a map and make Leicester, UK an exclave of Gujarat, India just because there are more gujratis there than white English?
As I said, Armenia is disconnected from N-K by Azeri land. The Kashmir analogy is a poor one simply for geographical reasons, never mind anything else.They are different that is part of Britain but there are a government in karabakh
What Azerbaijan want to do with angry Armenians after conquering karabakh? The have not peacefully choices they must do hard with them if want there for ever but violence make more violence I don't think it will be a stable land for them
Kashmir people majority are Muslims and must be part Pakistan but as you can see this problem never solve under Indian occupation
So I think they will make a corrupt autonomous region like Chechen because a normal Armenian autonomous part of Azerbaijan is impossibleAs I said, Armenia is disconnected from N-K by Azeri land. The Kashmir analogy is a poor one simply for geographical reasons, never mind anything else.
That N-K has provided itself with a functioning "government" does not exclude its definition in legal terms as occupied territories.
If Azerbaijan takes part or all of N-K, I'm not sure what the outcome would be for the Armenians there. One hopes they aren't unfairly disadvantaged whoever ends up in control.
our president just talked about it... he said when Makron phoned him about this, he said its simple lie, and if he bring any fakt about it, he will stop whole operation, he said 6 days passed but still nothing, Makron phoned him again that his inteligense got the info, he said again, show me single fakt and i stop whole operation. as you see its all lie...Why don’t turks send their own soldiers to die for their wars than to send some slave? Are turks too pu$$y to fight Armenians when they out number them 90 million to 3 million
Take a look on the map againTurkey dont share border with Azerbaijan. How do they shipped to there? Plus the fighter is impossible to fight on border of turkey armenia.