Assam violence death toll rises to 21, shoot-at-sight order issued

[Bhairava]

You should be aware, as one of the most active Sangh Parivar supporters on this forum, and a viciously bigoted one at that, that revisionist is applied to the peculiar lot of people who are trying to re-write history from the Hindu point of view - currentlyrepresented by Talageri and Elst.

No wonder the so-called "liberals" are actually the most dogmatic and the intolerant of all - pushing their viewpoint on everyone and trying to browbeat anyone who doesnt agree with them as "intolerant" and "bigoted". Not anymore. The veneer is falling off.

If you are indeed liberal then you ought to be accomodating to my views, if not then you are no liberal.

 

[Joe Shearer]

No wonder the so-called "liberals" are actually the most dogmatic and the intolerant of all - pushing their viewpoint on everyone and trying to browbeat anyone who doesnt agree with them as "intolerant" and "bigoted". Not anymore. We have seen through the veneer.

If you are indeed liberal then you ought to be accomodating to my views, if not then you are no liberal.

Under the veneer there is normally solid wood, what do you see?

And your remark is grossly unfair. What I have said again and again is that this OOI stuff is yet unproven, and unaccepted. Nothing more.

How can an individual enter into a pact with another individual to accept an academic point of view before the academic world has itself come to some tentative conclusions?

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Hope bodos will hit back hard , illegal fanatic migrants free assam \m/

the bodos are fighting for exactly that....Azad Assam

so sure, good luck to them!

 

[Roybot]

the bodos are fighting for exactly that....Azad Assam

so sure, good luck to them!

You seem to be stuck in the 90's.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

keep lolling
Bd's here are thousand times worst than afgans in paksitan

now got it???

you have no idea wtf ur talkin about

 

[illusion8]

For your information Mughals were naver able to enslave sikhs....Yes they definatly Ruled Rajputs......Btw have you heard about the Grat Hari Singh Nalwa

On a second note just few months ago i heard the Only Legal Heir of The Gread Mughal Empire was driving Rikshaw in streets of West Bengal..to fulfill his daily needs.

articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-04-27/hyderabad/28139632_1_mughals-descendant-bahadur-shah-zafar

I thought this was last one of the farts alive.

 

[samv]

^^^

Don't speak like stupid singalese language having similarity with Bengali . For all dravidian's language proto-tamil is the mother of all languages like wise Sanskrit in north India.

I'm sorry, weren't you the one saying that the Sinhalese are from Bengal? Have you changed your tune now?

Singalese not come under dravidian language branch then hw come you claiming that singalese are native to SL .If that is case Sinhalese language is spontaneously developed that means endemic?.

You're right - the Sinhalese language is classified as an Indo-Aryan language like Hindi, Punjabi, Gujarati, Marathi, Oriya.

But then, so is Dhivehi which is spoken in the Maldives.

So tell me, how come there are Dravidian language speaking Brahui in Pakistan?

so you go to a new place and develop a new language, so that land becomes your not the ones who lived there before your arival.
come on man. Tamils lived there before your race came there. and because Tamils have their nativity in TN does not mean sqat and your argument of sending SLs Tamil who inhibited the land before you to TN stands void.

So you are saying like Neuro, that there were Sinhalese people who came from India? This means that there must have been flourishing Sinhalese kingdoms in ancient India and the Sinhalese language must have been spoken in India. Do you have any evidence of this? I would like to have a look at it. Like a typical Tamil nationalist you keep repeating the same old stuff - according to you guys the Sinhalese come from Gujarat or Bengal or Orissa or Kalinga or they are Malayalis or they are Tamils who converted to Buddhism. Which one of these 'theories' do you subscribe to?

And where have I ever said that Tamils who inhabit Sri Lanka should be sent to Tamil Nadu?

Tamils have absolutely no evidence of a flourishing civilization in Sri Lanka.

The Sinhalese, on the other hand, do.

Evidence of a flourishing Tamil civilization is found in the Tamil homeland of Tamil Nadu, however.

Tamils in Sri Lanka are the remnants of Tamil invasions into Sri Lanka, which happened quite frequently. That is why most of them are found in northern Sri Lanka. Cholas, Pandyas and Cheras are not native to Sri Lanka - they are native to South India.

 

[Bhairava]

Under the veneer there is normally solid wood, what do you see?

And your remark is grossly unfair. What I have said again and again is that this OOI stuff is yet unproven, and unaccepted. Nothing more.

How can an individual enter into a pact with another individual to accept an academic point of view before the academic world has itself come to some tentative conclusions?

Who or what gave you the impression that I believe in OOI ?

For the record I don't believe in it - I believe in the theory of migration spread over thousands of years and those small migrant communities completely and wholly assimilating into the local setup like the Hepthalites.

The problem is people have one stereotype and keep peddling that without knowing that individual opinions about specific issues vary even amongst those who agree on a common idealogy on a broad basis.

Anyway let's not get offtopic.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Ethnic groups have been superceded by nation states. All Sri Lankan citizens are citizens of the state whether they are Tamil, Sinhalese, Moor, Malay or whatever. (Similarly all Indian citizens are citizens of that country whether they are Gujarati, Marathi, Bengali, Malayali etc). That does not mean that Tamils are native to Sri Lanka. The homeland of the Tamil people, as an ethnic group, is found in South India in what is known as "Tamil Nadu" -- not in Sri Lanka. Similarly the homeland of the Gujarati people is Gujarat, the Marathi people is Maharashatra; it is Kerala for the Malayali people and Karnataka for the Kannadiga people. Similarly the homeland of the Sinhalese people is Sri Lanka (which is the size of an Indian state). Tamils are not native to Punjab, and they are not native to Sri Lanka. Those Tamils who are in Sri Lanka are Sri Lankan citizens however, and they are an absolutely tiny, tiny portion of the global Tamil population the VAST majority of whom reside in Tamil Nadu ("Tamil Country"), in India.

Different perspectives, i won't entirely disagree on this.

It has already been dealt with.

Good!

Gujarat, Orissa, Kashmir, the massacre of Sikhs.

Have a look at how millions upon millions of Dalits are treated in India.

You don't think that is a crime against humanity?

If the above were encouraged by the Indian Govt then yes!

Yes, when it makes sense.

See, India had some 60,000 Afghan refugees, but very few were granted citizenship, why will an impoverished nation burden itself even more? India even went for a war on this issue, the 1971 war.

If I am not mistaken the vast majority of those who reside in the North Eastern portion of India are Bengali speakers.

Yes and they concentrated in West Bengal, where these immigrants are not welcome.

Problem comes with the immigrants migrating to Assam.

 

[jinxeD_girl]

For your information Mughals were naver able to enslave sikhs....Yes they definatly Ruled Rajputs......Btw have you heard about the Grat Hari Singh Nalwa

On a second note just few months ago i heard the Only Legal Heir of The Gread Mughal Empire was driving Rikshaw in streets of West Bengal..to fulfill his daily needs.

articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-04-27/hyderabad/28139632_1_mughals-descendant-bahadur-shah-zafar

There r few others too. According to the book the city of djinns, one of the Mughal Princess works as a librarian in New Delhi. He brothers left for Pakistan, but she decided to stay back in India.

I thought this was last one of the farts alive.

So sad, looks more Indian than Mughal (Turkic).

 

[Hindustani]

I thought this was last one of the farts alive.

He meant legal heir.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Who or what gave you the impression that I believe in OOI ?

What do you mean? What about remarks like this, then?

By revisionists and marxists whose only goal in life is to super-impose a pro-invader image on Indian history

 

[Hindustani]

So sad, looks more Indian than Mughal (Turkic).

Well there were intermarriages between the Rajputs and Mughals.

 

[Bhairava]

the bodos are fighting for exactly that....Azad Assam

so sure, good luck to them!

I think you just posted post#725 without reading the previous 724 posts. Azad Assam yeah..from the illegal Bangladeshis or former East Pakistanis.

 

[LaBong]

I guess neuro is talking about the legend of vijay singha, although I'm not sure of its true