What's new

Assadynasty launching Operation Damascus Steel against Saudi Arabia backed militants imminent

So far Assad aka Putin aka Khamenai thugs slaughtered 300 civilians, did not advance even 1 meter.
 
.
.
Why should they risk men advancing?

Lol they are bunch of pussy with no war capability. If we acted like these pussies we should have taken half of Syria by pressing missile buttons from our side of the border.
 
.
Lol they are bunch of pussy with no war capability. If we acted like these pussies we should have taken half of Syria by pressing missile buttons from our side of the border.

Urban warfare is much more different than your past and current experiences. In one case only, you destroyed an entire district of Diyarbakir to clear PKK from it. So we have seen you doing it. It's basically the same for any other army. Now imagine the same PKK, with thousands of more fighters, with tanks, ATGMs, heavy mortars, Grad launchers, IEDs etc entrenched in a dense urban are in Damascus countryside. It's easy to sit behind a monitor and win wars.

When you have thousands of terrorists embedded deeply among civilian areas and homes in cities, it's impossible to take it back without destroying the city, with lots of casualties if the terrorists are willing to fight to last breath.

Look at Raqqa, Mosul, Fallujaah (U.S spec ops operations in beginning of Iraq invasion), Ramadi etc.
 
Last edited:
.
Urban warfare is much more different than your past and current experiences. In one case only, you destroyed an entire district of Diyarbakir to clear PKK from it. So we have seen you doing it. It's basically the same for any other army. Now imagine the same PKK, with thousands of more fighters, with tanks, ATGMs, heavy mortars, Grad launchers, IEDs etc entrenched in a dense urban are in Damascus countryside. It's easy to sit behind a monitor and win wars.

When you have thousands of terrorists embedded deeply among civilian areas and homes in cities, it's impossible to take it back without destroying the city, with lots of casualties if the terrorists are willing to fight to last breath.

Look at Raqqa, Mosul, Fallujaah (U.S spec ops operations in beginning of Iraq invasion), Ramadi etc.

You can destroy everywhere unless you don't kill civilians. You can build a city from stratch but can't bring back lost lives. We didn't destroy them while people inside and didn't slaughter thousands of innocent civilian.

Secondly, we have slaughtered 3000+ Daesh members inside of homes, behind civilian shields, dressed like civilian, suicide attacks at Euphrates Shield Op. yet 0 civilian casulties. This is how a professional army with ethics behave.

Watch this video and learn how to eleminate enemy at urban warfare.

 
. .
You can destroy everywhere unless you don't kill civilians. You can build a city from stratch but can't bring back lost lives. We didn't destroy them while people inside and didn't slaughter thousands of innocent civilian.

Secondly, we have slaughtered 3000+ Daesh members inside of homes, behind civilian shields, dressed like civilian, suicide attacks at Euphrates Shield Op. yet 0 civilian casulties. This is how a professional army with ethics behave.

Watch this video and learn how to eleminate enemy at urban warfare.


Dear, I think you have no idea what a dense urban environment is. What you see in Afrin and what you faced in Euphrates Shield doesn't even come close to a heavy urban battle. It's good you have drones to monitor a car in a village, but it's literally nothing compared to Damascus suburbs.

I am not saying SAA has not killed civilians, they have and they could do much better. But do consider the differences. Also SAA doesn't have much of precise ammunition in its inventory. After a heavy 7 year war, their storages have been emptied of such weapons if there was any.
 
. .
Dear, I think you have no idea what a dense urban environment is. What you see in Afrin and what you faced in Euphrates Shield doesn't even come close to a heavy urban battle. It's good you have drones to monitor a car in a village, but it's literally nothing compared to Damascus suburbs.

I am not saying SAA has not killed civilians, they have and they could do much better. But do consider the differences. Also SAA doesn't have much of precise ammunition in its inventory. After a heavy 7 year war, their storages have been emptied of such weapons if there was any.

I am speaking regarding your Diyarbakır example about ruining the city. Buildings may be destroyed, this is war, there may even be civilian casulties but let's agree on one thing; Neither Assad regime care of civilian loss nor Russia, YPG, USA. So don't even try to compare Turkish army with other ones. This is an insult.

About weapon storages, Assad at least has Russian air support. But he just prefers to drop barrels from the helicopters on civilians without care.
 
. . . .
.
Dear, I think you have no idea what a dense urban environment is. What you see in Afrin and what you faced in Euphrates Shield doesn't even come close to a heavy urban battle. It's good you have drones to monitor a car in a village, but it's literally nothing compared to Damascus suburbs.

I am not saying SAA has not killed civilians, they have and they could do much better. But do consider the differences. Also SAA doesn't have much of precise ammunition in its inventory. After a heavy 7 year war, their storages have been emptied of such weapons if there was any.
Lack of guided weapons does not justify indiscriminate bombings which is a war crime and terror. Just like lack of wife does not justify u go out to street and rape.

Assadist main aim is genocide and ethnic cleansing all the rest is just excuse.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom