Assad gassed to death 40 civilians in Douma (clear evidence)

[Tokhme khar]

 

[Vapnope]

Its cute when Americans and Israelis try to pedal higher moral ground.
One had literally nuked its adversary and has invaded multiple countries on the pretext of WMDs other is busy bombing populated cities like Gaza and jailing teenagers on the allegations of terrorism.

Seems like anyone who opposes their hegemony is a terrorist !

 

[SALMAN F]

The indian zionist whore said they will not tolerate the use of chemical weapons but they kept quite when saddam used them against Iranians and Kurds

 

[Tokhme khar]

Exactly, because these zionist pigs gave those weapons to saddam. Later on saddam turned against them after he realized he was used like a donkey. Then they killed him.......lol

Sad part is that muslims never learn, how NOT to get used in geopolitical games.

The indian zionist whore said they will not tolerate the use of chemical weapons but they kept quite when saddam used them against Iranians and Kurds

 

[SALMAN F]

@500 did you know that Mattis works for Alasad? he said there was no evidence that the attacks in 2017 and 2013 was done by Syrian government...

http://www.newsweek.com/now-mattis-...ence-assad-using-poison-gas-his-people-801542

Dang man, you are still here spreading lies and crap??

Welcome back syrian lion last post of you was in august 2016 it's like two years or more

Exactly, because these zionist pigs gave those weapons to saddam. Later on saddam turned against them after he realized he was used like a donkey. Then they killed him.......lol

Sad part is that muslims never learn, how NOT to get used in geopolitical games.

Indeed these animals when saddam was killing iranians, Shias and Kurds they help him but when he invaded Kuwait they start to talk about Halabja has attacks

They called him murder only after he turned against them

 

[Tokhme khar]

Breaking news!

US has attacked T-4 (Homs AFB) in missile strike:

https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201804091063350117-syrian-airbase-rocket-attack/

 

[50cent]

Guys
This is an excellent thread, see the alliance between terrorists like HannibalBarca the ISIS mercenary, Takfiri oblious and Israelis,

That's what we called pigs and apes alliance

 

[Zhukov]

"Better to fight alongside them then to fight alone afterwards"
Lets take down this Evil Empire of death and destruction in Syria together or they will consume us all.
Blunt the Warmongers in Pentagon shatter their confidence in this destruction streak of place of choosing. So that American Public sentiments grow against them and they grow weaker in USA and Anti-War people get a stronger narrative.
Same for Israel.
Join hands and stand against this mad bulldog war machine.
Support Russia/Syria/Iran in this war against USA/Israel.
Don't be a Gullible Idiot of Main stream Media.

Breaking news!

US has attacked T-4 (Homs AFB) in missile strike:

https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201804091063350117-syrian-airbase-rocket-attack/

The Air attack was carried from Lebanese Airspace by Israeli Aircraft at the same time ISIS Attacked Qaryatin city again. Surprise but no Surprise. Sadly for ZioS**** the attack is repelled and Missile attack is also intercepted. No Structural damage to any assets on T4. Minimal human casualties reported.
Seems like Israeli Air Dominance over Syria is diminishing fast.
And Nobody talks rat a** about Israel constantly violating Lebanese Airspace to launch missiles into Syria

 

[500]

@500 did you know that Mattis works for Alasad? he said there was no evidence that the attacks in 2017 and 2013 was done by Syrian government...

http://www.newsweek.com/now-mattis-...ence-assad-using-poison-gas-his-people-801542

Dang man, you are still here spreading lies and crap??

This stupid article is written by Assad fanboy.

 

[Gomig-21]

Unexploded ODAB-500 bombs:

That thing is over 10ft long (roughly 3+ meters) and look at how small the opening is in that concrete roof AS WELL AS how vertical it's positioned, which leads to the next pic you posted below...

Unexploded ODAB-500 bombs:

Notice the strings? That's a parachute bomb, hence why it was perfectly vertical and one of the reasons why it went through the concrete roof in that manner. The other reason is even though it's a parachute bomb, it's size and weight is 40X that of those other chlorine canisters and even with all that, the impact through the roof is much smaller than that in the other pics.

That's why it doesn't make sense that those flimsy chemical canisters are practically un-bruised after going through that roof and leaving behind a much larger gaping hole through a foot of reinforced concrete. Something is fishy.

 

[Gomig-21]

If you look at Assad's doctrine, you might find the answer.

Assad uses the same tactic that Russia would use in a war. There has recently been a US handbook on how to deal with the Russian doctrine, which I read on War Is Boring someday past.

The main strategy is chaos. Barrel bombs and so much destruction isn't to kill people, but to shock them. It is the strategy of fear, to strike disorder by ensuring that some fighters are killed, some are helping civilians, and others are mourning for their dead families and friends. This breaks the, and when the people have had enough, they start to reject the Rebels, in hopes for the bombing to stop.

I think the majority of those in the know are familiar with the concept behind the use of chemical weapons and the effects on the populace. Unfortunately this was something practiced by several Arab countries that puts a dark spot on their history. Saddam understood that strategy quite well along with those who supported him. Even the Germans used that strategy to break the stalemate of trench warfare. It was more of a psychological effect rather than a destructive one. I'm with you on that.

Worst of all is the use of Chlorine gas. It isn't like Sarin. It sinks to the bottom, into the cellars and underground places, forcing the civilians out of their shelter. And there have been hundreds of chemical attacks, and each and every one of them save Khan Sheikhoun have been met with zero resistance.

Doesn't sound suspicious to me.

The problem is that it's completely unnecessary for him to risk any level of retaliation at this point of the war where he has basically won and consolidated his position with only remnants left to defeat. It makes no sense. Even Trump is yacking about pulling out. I know everyone here is screaming "what consequences" but even Assad isn't stupid enough to realize that there has been an increased concern over any usage of CW in Syria and even though the last retaliation didn't have as much of an impact as the national community would've liked, there is undoubtedly a large chance that the next retaliation would be much worst and at the same time, he's undermining those who are supporting him. If there isn't any other reason not to use CW, it would be that. Think of what the Russians would be saying right now, assuming this was an attack perpetrated by Assad's orders. Are we saying the Russians supported this? Or they knew nothing about it or don't care?

What about all the Iranian support? Is he that inconsiderate that he suddenly exposes all Iranian assets in Syria which would be targets of retaliation (which seems to have happened already) and what is the Iranian stand? Are we saying that they would've supported such a stupid action by Assad? Or did he do it without their knowledge? There's so many considerations that make this suspicious.

Only Ru and SY planes can go into Damascus and suburbs, due to cover from S-400 systems.

I believe there is a slew of American and Israeli aircraft flying at altitude over Damascus which will never be threatened by Russian operated S-400s. If we could find out what aircraft dropped these things, it would settle the things.

 

[500]

That thing is over 10ft long (roughly 3+ meters) and look at how small the opening is in that concrete roof AS WELL AS how vertical it's positioned, which leads to the next pic you posted below...



Notice the strings? That's a parachute bomb, hence why it was perfectly vertical and one of the reasons why it went through the concrete roof in that manner. The other reason is even though it's a parachute bomb, it's size and weight is 40X that of those other chlorine canisters and even with all that, the impact through the roof is much smaller than that in the other pics.

That's why it doesn't make sense that those flimsy chemical canisters are practically un-bruised after going through that roof and leaving behind a much larger gaping hole through a foot of reinforced concrete. Something is fishy.

Khan al Assal, August 2017

Al-Lataminah, Hama, March 25th 2017

Kafarzita, Hama, October 1st 2016

 

[HannibalBarca]

@Gomig-21
Before Chlorine attack : JAS wanted a better deal/no deal to evacuate.
After Chlorine attack: JAS accepted the basic deal for evacuation...

As for the Chlorine canister... A lot of pics show "complete" canister after drop... So this theory of "Fake bc it's not in pcs" Have no importance.

Anyway...

Check Below...
Check the Foam.
Check and check again.

Spoiler: Fake news...

 

[Mhmoud]

I think the majority of those in the know are familiar with the concept behind the use of chemical weapons and the effects on the populace. Unfortunately this was something practiced by several Arab countries that puts a dark spot on their history. Saddam understood that strategy quite well along with those who supported him. Even the Germans used that strategy to break the stalemate of trench warfare. It was more of a psychological effect rather than a destructive one. I'm with you on that.



The problem is that it's completely unnecessary for him to risk any level of retaliation at this point of the war where he has basically won and consolidated his position with only remnants left to defeat. It makes no sense. Even Trump is yacking about pulling out. I know everyone here is screaming "what consequences" but even Assad isn't stupid enough to realize that there has been an increased concern over any usage of CW in Syria and even though the last retaliation didn't have as much of an impact as the national community would've liked, there is undoubtedly a large chance that the next retaliation would be much worst and at the same time, he's undermining those who are supporting him. If there isn't any other reason not to use CW, it would be that. Think of what the Russians would be saying right now, assuming this was an attack perpetrated by Assad's orders. Are we saying the Russians supported this? Or they knew nothing about it or don't care?

What about all the Iranian support? Is he that inconsiderate that he suddenly exposes all Iranian assets in Syria which would be targets of retaliation (which seems to have happened already) and what is the Iranian stand? Are we saying that they would've supported such a stupid action by Assad? Or did he do it without their knowledge? There's so many considerations that make this suspicious.



I believe there is a slew of American and Israeli aircraft flying at altitude over Damascus which will never be threatened by Russian operated S-400s. If we could find out what aircraft dropped these things, it would settle the things.

I don't really think that there will be any external effect of whatever he does that will put his life or that of the regime in danger. The Eastern Ghouta attack in 2013 killed over 1000, and there was no threat of invasion. They just told Assad to hand in his chemical weapons and he did so. There is no external interest in Syria like there have been in Iraq or in Libya, hence the lack of any possibility to invade. The same goes with Yemen. If you look at what happened last year, the cruise missile strikes were due to the public pressure, as there was video footage that quickly spread. However, what I had noticed was that in both instances, when viewed from BBC news, the newsreel stated Russia's denial over the attack happening in the first place, rather than the fact that an attack took place. In both cases, the PM said that Russia and Iran should exert pressure on the Assad regime. Note the absence of any threat to take action. All sorries, no actual action. So the answer, in my view, is that there are no consequences to begin with, and the worst thing to happen in the first place is that Assad will lose a few planes and an ammo storage container. Very little considering his order of 22 MiG-29s last year.And whatever UN resolution will be vetoed by Russia or China.

Assad knows that there will be no action and that Russia has already paid a hefty price for the war. If they let Assad fall, then it would have paid for nothing. Iran would lose so many deals on so many different sectors. China would lose its cut on the construction. Assad has made sure that if he pays the price, so will all his supporters. So his supporters make sure that he never pays the price.

Also, the fact that the Israelis struck T4 from Lebanese airspace suggests that Russia has tightened up the airspace after the attack, in possible retaliation from other states.

If you have any counter-arguments or questions, you are free to ask on. Debates like these aim to the truth.

 

[Gomig-21]

Check Below...
Check the Foam.
Check and check again.

I'm going to pretend you never even went there.