What's new

As Muslims Cross Over to the BJP, Violence Erupts

Stop spinning. It was China who attacked during the Cuban missile crisis to make a point.

Of late is China who has been rejecting the offer of making the LCA into IB. That is the truth.

China refuses to negotiate disputed region which India claims but only wants to discuss disputed areas which China claim :disagree: That too is the truth.

So you think your own Army is lying when they wrote the Henderson-Brooks report?

Like I said, we made the offer back in 1960.

If India wants to reconsider it, they can come forward any time. But they never do.
 
.
So you think your own Army is lying when they wrote the Henderson-Brooks report?

Like I said, we made the offer back in 1960.

If India wants to reconsider it, they can come forward any time. But they never do.

Henderson-Brooks report is an internal assessment of the IA, not a neutral study on the whole subject.

If you want to continue to believe or pretend to believe that China has made the offer and India has refused it, continue to believe that. As i said, Political immaturity cannot be wished away.

Such childish argument is best left for other kids in pdf.
 
.
Henderson-Brooks report is an internal assessment of the IA, not a neutral study on the whole subject.

If you want to continue to believe or pretend to believe that China has made the offer and India has refused it, continue to believe that. As i said, Political immaturity cannot be wished away.

Such childish argument is best left for other kids in pdf.

I'm the one providing sources from India's own military reports, you are the one putting your fingers in your ears and pretending that these sources don't exist.

You're right, it's pointless to debate with you. Your facts come out of thin air, you haven't provided even a single source.
 
.
Like I said, we made the offer back in 1960.

If India wants to reconsider it, they can come forward any time. But they never do.

As far as I know, the offer's no longer on the table and I, very much doubt that you have any authority to speak for the govt of China. However, if by some miracle, you do end up in a position to speak for the govt of China, please do let us and I'm sure the Indian govt would be glad to take up with issue with you.
 
.
As far as I know, the offer's no longer on the table and I, very much doubt that you have any authority to speak for the govt of China. However, if by some miracle, you do end up in a position to speak for the govt of China, please do let us and I'm sure the Indian govt would be glad to take up with issue with you.

That's such a lame excuse, we already made the offer, the Indian government has had several decades to come out and say they want to consider it.

And they never do. Clearly, just like Nehru, they aren't the slightest bit interested.
 
.
That's such a lame excuse, we already made the offer, the Indian government has had several decades to come out and say they want to consider it.

And they never do. Clearly, just like Nehru, they aren't the slightest bit interested.

We can't unilaterally accept offers that are not available anymore, can we now? Like I said, if by some miracle you'd do find yourself in a position to speak for the China, do look us up and I'm sure we can work something out.
 
.
I'm the one providing sources from India's own military reports, you are the one putting your fingers in your ears and pretending that these sources don't exist.

You're right, it's pointless to debate with you. Your facts come out of thin air, you haven't provided even a single source.

There is nothing to debate. Indian govt. position on this is pretty clear. China was the aggressor. When the Indian govt. changes its position, I will too.

I can quote various sources and links but its pointless. Its has been done a 100 times in PDF and not gotten anywhere. Which is why I don't want to waste my time trying to counter your propaganda. There are other kids here who will do it and indulge you.

What do you want to debate ? That if India was the aggressor or if China was the aggressor ? How does it matter ? :disagree:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom