What's new

As India shines on list of wealthiest nations, Pakistan stands out for all wrong reasons

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is purchasing power. Different from nominal. India is a 10 Trillion $ economy by purchasing power. We would be first to brag if it was a useful measure.
Even nominal GDP , China's per capita is 10,000 dollars this year, what about US? 110,000?

Services.
Ok , whatever you say, India will be the first big population country to achieve this goal only through service. congrats.
 
.
Even nominal GDP , China's per capita is 10,000 dollars this year, what about US? 110,000?


Ok , whatever you say, India will be the first big population country to achieve this goal only through service. congrats.
Do you understand the difference between wealth and GDP. I quoted wealth. Just FYI they are different.

Even nominal GDP , China's per capita is 10,000 dollars this year, what about US? 110,000?


Ok , whatever you say, India will be the first big population country to achieve this goal only through service. congrats.
I edit the last post could you edit your reply according to that. thanks.
 
. .
Services.
I have to agree with @beijingwalker partially because China is leading in many sectors not just in comparison to India but also the US. The services sector alone can't drive our economy and expect us to be on par with China. We need to focus more on automation, technology, investing in R&D etc.

Most IT companies in India are based on offering services, after-sales support etc but there are very few development centers where the actual product is being built. I do agree we've excelled in many sectors when compared to the best countries in those fields but it is China whom we should look up to and not the puny pakistan
 
. .
Objectively false.
We 3 don't have similar cultures, politics or starting line.
We don't eat dosas, bath in rivers as a form of worship, or are shaped by the cast system.
After partition, India got most of the pre partition resources (they were bigger so I don't have too much issue there). And, the British ruled over parts of India for almost 400 years where they only entered modern day Pakistan 100 years before partition.

So no, we are not the same and we didn't start from the same starting point.
Pakistan basically started from nothing as India got most of the resources.
British ruled 400 years?
 
. . .
India's open defecation rate was 66% in 2000 and 40% in 2015 while Pakistan's open defecation rate was 41% in 2000 and 12% in 2015 (I have never seen someone openly defecate in Pakistan, ever).

Also not to mention how skewed 'Swach Bharat' stats are regarding open defecation, the problem is much more serious.

https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/is-india-really-winning-its-war-on-open-defecation/
https://thewire.in/health/732-million-india-tops-list-number-people-without-access-toilets-report
Your reports are quoting old data. You can find latest figures in my links. In the meanwhile can you quote a reliable source for the Pakistan data you quoted. I had trouble finding it Thanks.
 
.
India's open defecation rate was 66% in 2000 and 40% in 2015 while Pakistan's open defecation rate was 41% in 2000 and 12% in 2015 (I have never seen someone openly defecate in Pakistan, ever).

Also not to mention how skewed 'Swach Bharat' stats are regarding open defecation, the problem is much more serious.

https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/is-india-really-winning-its-war-on-open-defecation/
https://thewire.in/health/732-million-india-tops-list-number-people-without-access-toilets-report




That percentage is based on national rates. Someone who earns less than $2-3 in Pakistan is considered impoverished while in India it's somewhere around $1.

This is a better source as it compares the countries by fixed rates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_percentage_of_population_living_in_poverty

We beat you in all three rates.
It not a better source and i will tell you why (It is a raw compilation of data measured across different methodologies). Poverty is measured in purchasing power not nominal. Simply said a dollar buys much more in India than Pakistan. Therefore India'a poverty line has to be lower in dollar terms.
 
.
According to that same source, Pakistanis on average have a much larger, faster growing and wealthier middle class.

Pakistanis are wealthier per capita than Indians.
Again please post link too. Credit Susie outs tons of data every year. I will need the link to rebuttle it.

That percentage is based on national rates. Someone who earns less than $2-3 in Pakistan is considered impoverished while in India it's somewhere around $1.

This is a better source as it compares the countries by fixed rates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_percentage_of_population_living_in_poverty

We beat you in all three rates.

It not a better source and i will tell you why (Wiki is a raw compilation of data measured across different methodologies and it is very obvious when you see the page). Poverty is measured in purchasing power not nominal. Simply said a dollar buys much more in India than Pakistan. Therefore India'a poverty line has to be lower in dollar terms.

India's open defecation rate was 66% in 2000 and 40% in 2015 while Pakistan's open defecation rate was 41% in 2000 and 12% in 2015 (I have never seen someone openly defecate in Pakistan, ever).

Also not to mention how skewed 'Swach Bharat' stats are regarding open defecation, the problem is much more serious.

https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/is-india-really-winning-its-war-on-open-defecation/
https://thewire.in/health/732-million-india-tops-list-number-people-without-access-toilets-report
Your reports are quoting old data. You can find latest figures in my links. In the meanwhile can you quote a reliable source for the Pakistan data you quoted. I had trouble finding it Thanks.
 
.
I hate to do this to you. But https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/swac...80-doubling-coverage-from-start.550497/page-4. India is now 80 pc open defecation free and on track to be 99 percent free by septempber 2019.

While on the other hand https://tribune.com.pk/story/163248...pen-defecation-leaves-punjab-reeling-reeking/. Paksitan is only making slow progress and has already falle behind India
India's open defecation rate was 66% in 2000 and 40% in 2015 while Pakistan's open defecation rate was 41% in 2000 and 12% in 2015 (I have never seen someone openly defecate in Pakistan, ever).

Also not to mention how skewed 'Swach Bharat' stats are regarding open defecation, the problem is much more serious.

https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/is-india-really-winning-its-war-on-open-defecation/
https://thewire.in/health/732-million-india-tops-list-number-people-without-access-toilets-report

An investigative team of journalists from The Indian Express visited the celebrated districts of Mungeli and Dhamtari in December 2016. They found that the Modi government’s claims of the area having achieved 100 percent ODF status for this area are demonstrably false.

The playground of Government Higher Secondary School in Amdi, Dhamtari district is used as an open toilet by the local residents. Imagine the playground of a school where hundreds of people relieve themselves. “The children complain of the smell, and imagine the flies that come into their food,” school principal S. R. Tejaswi told Indian Express.

In Mohdi village, meanwhile, approximately 100 out of 300 total households don’t have any toilet. The toilets that have been built by the government are often unusable — according to Indian Express, the majority of them do not have water connections or tanks and are far from the sewage pipes. Instead, the toilets lead to open drains.

For this reason many villagers have found alternative use for these government-built toilets: storing crops. This is far from being ODF, as being claimed by the Indian government.

A daily farm worker and a local resident, Yuvraj Sahu, said that government officials visited his one-room house and told him it was impossible to build a private toilet. Later, however, some officials asked him to pose in front of a toilet at his neighbor’s house; the photo later appeared in local newspapers. Sahu investigated with local authorities and found that the government had recorded spending Rs. 12,000 (approximately $185) on building a toilet in his house. In reality, he relieves himself in a nearby pond.

“There are many other cases like mine, but who will listen?” Sahu told Indian Express.

This is just one example. If detailed investigations were carried out elsewhere, hundreds of such toilet scams would likely be exposed all over India. Clearly, local officials are siphoning off the funds sent by the government for the construction of toilets. These bureaucrats then cook up their own records to show that every house has a toilet. As a result, on paper toilets are being built, whereas in reality people still defecate in the open. The bureaucrats are thus “fulfilling” the targets set by the government through falsifying records and pocketing the government funds meant for this purpose. The irony is that Chhattisgarh province is also controlled by Modi’s party, the BJP.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2046.html. Moreover Pakistan does not have a reliable census for a long time now. Even its population estimates vary by 40 Million.
That percentage is based on national rates. Someone who earns less than $2-3 in Pakistan is considered impoverished while in India it's somewhere around $1.

This is a better source as it compares the countries by fixed rates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_percentage_of_population_living_in_poverty

We beat you in all three rates.

Data shows that economic gains in Pakistan are shared better than India and Bangladesh because of lower inequality. Income poverty rate (those below $1.25 per capita per day) in India is 33% and Bangladesh 43% versus 13% in Pakistan, according to WB data on povcalNet.

A whole subject in economics . Refer Credit Suisse's GlobalWealth Databook for standard methodology.
According to that same source, Pakistanis on average have a much larger, faster growing and wealthier middle class.

Pakistanis are wealthier per capita than Indians.

It not a better source and i will tell you why (It is a raw compilation of data measured across different methodologies). Poverty is measured in purchasing power not nominal. Simply said a dollar buys much more in India than Pakistan. Therefore India'a poverty line has to be lower in dollar terms.
The rates are adjusted for purchase parity.
 
.
India's open defecation rate was 66% in 2000 and 40% in 2015 while Pakistan's open defecation rate was 41% in 2000 and 12% in 2015 (I have never seen someone openly defecate in Pakistan, ever).

Also not to mention how skewed 'Swach Bharat' stats are regarding open defecation, the problem is much more serious.

https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/is-india-really-winning-its-war-on-open-defecation/
https://thewire.in/health/732-million-india-tops-list-number-people-without-access-toilets-report




That percentage is based on national rates. Someone who earns less than $2-3 in Pakistan is considered impoverished while in India it's somewhere around $1.

This is a better source as it compares the countries by fixed rates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_percentage_of_population_living_in_poverty

We beat you in all three rates.




According to that same source, Pakistanis on average have a much larger, faster growing and wealthier middle class.

Pakistanis are wealthier per capita than Indians.


The rates are adjusted for purchase parity.
I gave data and links to follow. While you are giving one liners to back your rebuttle. Please reply properly with proper data and sources next time if you expect a response.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom