What's new

As China rankles Philippines, India goes on Asean charm offensive

Status
Not open for further replies.
. .
Thanks for the article, observer. It shows me even more that the CPC, even at it's absolute worst, was still superior to the Wall Street regime backed KMT at the best of times. The genocide committed by the KMT in their 37 year reign is one of the biggest crimes against humanity and yet they're "democratic".

In trying to attack CPC you just made it look better. I wouldn't have known that without your link.
 
.
some great professors in the Us and worldwide also came up with the theory that 911 was an inside job. we can find a crackpot professor even within famed universities let alone ' Chinese prof" at garbage ones like university of Utah. how can you do number crunching when the data reported is severely fudged?

If a govt allowed a genocide of its people to protect its image- how can you rely on any census numbers that very same govt put out. Naturally, it would fudge it to show they did not have that many within its populous. this is joke. fox guarding the hen house! if you understand that analogy.
 
.
some great professors in the Us and worldwide also came up with the theory that 911 was an inside job. we can find a crackpot professor even within famed universities let alone ' Chinese prof" at garbage ones like university of Utah. how can you do number crunching when the data reported is severely fudged?

If a govt allowed a genocide of its people to protect its image- how can you rely on any census numbers that very same govt put out. Naturally, it would fudge it to show they did not have that many within its populous. this is joke. fox guarding the hen house! if you understand that analogy.

But the numbers that show 45 million are also claimed by the authors of the book to come from government archives.

Thanks for saying that's false.
 
. .
Former Chinese dissident and political prisoner, Minqi Li, a Marxist Professor of Economics at the University of Utah, has produced data showing that even the peak death rates during the Great Leap Forward were in fact quite typical in pre-Communist China. Li (2008) argues that based on the average death rate over the three years of the Great Leap Forward, there were several million fewer lives lost during this period than would have been the case under normal mortality conditions before 1949. [59]

Utsa Patnaik,Professor of Economics at the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, argues that some of the very high mortality estimates attributed to the Great Leap Forward, are in part a statistical construct, motivated by an underlying political agenda. Patnaik points out the following: "....because China in the single preceding decade of building socialism, had reduced its death rate at a much faster rate (from 29 to 12 comparing 1949 and 1958) than India had, this sharp rise to 25.4 in 1960 in China still meant that this "famine" death rate was virtually the same as the prevalent death rate in India which was 24.6 per thousand in 1960, only 0.8 lower. This latter rate being considered quite "normal" for India, has not attracted the slightest criticism. Further, in both the preceding and the suceeding year India's crude death rate was 8 to 10 per thousand higher than in China."[60]

I will do numbercrunching from census data myself later.

There is also an underlying political agenda of a Marxist professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University has a pro leftist-communist bent. Anyways this is offtopic
In trying to attack CPC you just made it look better. I wouldn't have known that without your link.

When did I attack the CPC ?
 
. .
But the numbers that show 45 million are also claimed by the authors of the book to come from government archives.

Thanks for saying that's false.

There are some that can't be reasoned with simply because they walk the world with blinders on
488777.jpg
 
. . . . .
come on don't go there. Its just Indians like JayAtl who screws it up for everyone else.

Indians like JayAtl are so common here that I don't even note down their names when they say this stuff.

You're right though, best to get back to the topic.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom