Arundhati Roy: India's economic success a 'lie'

[Gandhi G in da house]

I explained the same in detail in an other thread. He refuses to read and understand. His English is a bit weak. Refer to the thread related to 3rd Stealth from India and you will see how kiddish his understanding about PPP is.

Lets just leave it then .

 

[axisofevil]

The biggest joke is that she is able to speak such things in India because or the tolerance and democratic nature of Indians. I would request her to go and speak such things in Pakistan or even Bangladesh and also talk to Taslima Nasreen about how our neighbours tolerate such bullshit. Also she should visit China and take lessons of democracy from them. I woiuld request Roy to name atleast one perfect state??

Why should we care of other nations....we should compare ourselves to a much higher standard that's what will make India great. She is the voice for those who cannot speak. The ones who are exploited daily. India's economy has helped mainly the rich and the powerful and trickled down to the rest.

 

[axisofevil]

Don't worry, I have already provided the proof that WB figures are calculated on PPP bases and in not real terms of $1.25 or $2 per day or its rupees Equivalent.

I admire the persistence of our Indian guests on this forum. Despite clear cut explanation they still keep twisting my posts. Close to 80% figures were based on $1.25 or its rupees equivalent and 90% was based on $2 a day calculation.
Fact is, Ms.Roy is absolutely correct, 77% or close to 800 to 900 million people earn Rs20 or less in India.

I don;t agree with much you say but the defintion of levels of poverty in India and according to the World bank vary. We Indians must understand just because we broke barrier of salary to be considered for poverty, it does not erase the fact we have malnourished and uneducated ppl. We need to spend more on education, not just crap education but good quality education for ALL CHILDREN AND PEOPLE>

 

[OldKool]

Some people in Pakistan would say the same thing about the trio I mentioned.

Thats your opinion, I've seen Roy give constructive criticism.

Najan Sethi is a well wisher of pakistan but Arundhati is on a crusade againt Indian democracy by supporting naxalites and Kashmiri separatist!!!!!!

 

[nForce]

I explained the same in detail in an other thread. He refuses to read and understand. His English is a bit weak. Refer to the thread related to 3rd Stealth from India and you will see how kiddish his understanding about PPP is.

weird guy........

 

[crankthatskunk]

I explained the same in detail in an other thread. He refuses to read and understand. His English is a bit weak. Refer to the thread related to 3rd Stealth from India and you will see how kiddish his understanding about PPP is.

Why keep going about it, what qualifications you have in economics really? you have been stumped, unable to read and understand your own quotations. Keep your remarks to yourselves and get on with defending and proving that Ms. Roy is wrong or what I have presented is incorrect. Rest is nothing but an Indian trade mark hot air.

 

[crankthatskunk]

What a hypocrite! What about Najam Sethi sahab? Can he be your Arundhati Roy please?

Classic title for the video

India should give Najam Sethi and Dr Pervez Hoodbhoy Padma Vibhusan!

Najam Sethi is a known Indian agent ask any Pakistani. His level and his credibility as a Journalists had been exposed by me in the thread about Abbotabad Drama. People like him are cannon fodder for me, if he ever had the courage to have discussion with me. Presenting planted programs with a willing kid is a different thing, but being under an elephant is another scenario all together.

Most of Pakistani Journalists are idiots of highest order, I have absolutely no respect and time for them. I do write them e-mails, but off course they don't have courage to respond, otherwise they know their damn lies would be exposed.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

Najam Sethi is a known Indian agent ask any Pakistani. His level and his credibility as a Journalists had been exposed by me in the thread about Abbotabad Drama. People like him are cannon fodder for me, if he ever had the courage to have discussion with me. Presenting planted programs with a willing kid is a different thing, but being under an elephant is another scenario all together.

Most of Pakistani Journalists are idiots of highest order, I have absolutely no respect and time for them. I do write them e-mails, but off course they don't have courage to respond, otherwise they know their damn lies would be exposed.

And this guy is lecturing us about economics here .

 

[Zabaniyah]

Why keep going about it, what qualifications you have in economics really? you have been stumped, unable to read and understand your own quotations. Keep your remarks to yourselves and get on with defending and proving that Ms. Roy is wrong or what I have presented is incorrect. Rest is nothing but an Indian trade mark hot air.

crankthatskunk, tell you what. Grab an economics book, and study the chapter titled: Distribution of Wealth. Very S-L-O-W-L-Y.

You might be a bit more enlightened.

 

[kak1978]

[video]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13624077[/video]

A real good watch.

Well, This is a good watch for you, What about the other countless Video's from other foreign countries that say Indian Economy is booming. You find one video of an author who is trying to sell her book. Most of what she is talking about happens in Utopia. All the developed countries reached where they are after making many sacrifices. India will be no different.

 

[Roybot]

Najam Sethi is a known Indian agent ask any Pakistani. His level and his credibility as a Journalists had been exposed by me in the thread about Abbotabad Drama. People like him are cannon fodder for me, if he ever had the courage to have discussion with me. Presenting planted programs with a willing kid is a different thing, but being under an elephant is another scenario all together.

Am sorry, but why is a known Indian agent allowed to freely express his views on TV? Do share us the details of him being a known Indian agent. Call it coincidence, call it fate, Arundhati Roy is a known Pakistani agent too, ask any Indian.

 

[Galaxy]

The thread is still on ??

One should understand, Its individual view not country. 99.9999% people of India don't agree with her View. But Since, India is democratic country. Hence, She has right to give her view as per law. Indeed, every country has such person including Pakistan, Bangladesh, U.S., China. Everywhere.

It's Not a Issue. It's Individual View Only.

 

[asad71]

r even Bangladesh and also talk to Taslima Nasreen about how our neighbours tolerate such bullshit. A

====

1. In BD Tasleema is known as a high-class hooker. She had several husbands also. Believe she is a nymphomaniac. W Beng, Andhra and some other states have banned her. Contrary to what she tries to boast to get ears, she was never banned in BD. But she has been posing so to show off. Her writings are all pornography and sold as such on the footpath as established bookstores will not carry them.

2. Tasleema has been a hell of a misjudgment for RAW. She has let it down.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

====

1. In BD Tasleema is known as a high-class hooker. She had several husbands also. Believe she is a nymphomaniac. W Beng, Andhra and some other states have banned her. Contrary to what she tries to boast to get ears, she was never banned in BD. But she has been posing so to show off. Her writings are all pornography and sold as such on the footpath as established bookstores will not carry them.

2. Tasleema has been a hell of a misjudgment for RAW. She has let it down.

No wonder you have no Lajja

 

[crankthatskunk]

crankthatskunk, tell you what. Grab an economics book, and study the chapter titled: Distribution of Wealth. Very S-L-O-W-L-Y.

You might be a bit more enlightened.

He he , like I said have you got this BD flag for cover or you are one of those old school? What I see is kids stuff, so, I don't worry too much, just having fun. What have I seen in your responses, is good for a laugh, thats it. If any one of you was really capable than I would have thought about some serious discussion. What is the point going deep with people who quote figures based on PPP and then try to prove their own quotations wrong, when they realised they are snookered.