What's new

ArunachalPradesh part of Southern Tibet China doesn't recognise illegal McMahon Line:China to Doval

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
China doesn't recognise 'illegal' McMahon Line: Beijing responds to NSA Ajit Doval
  • PTI, Beijing
    |
  • Updated: May 25, 2015 21:51 IST
6dcecafc-0858-4967-9026-c09aa2ae78c3wallpaper1.jpg

NSA Ajit Doval with China special representative on the India-China Boundary Question Yang Jiechi. (Virendra Singh Gosain/HT Photo)
  • 138
  • 47
  • Share2
Sticking to its stand that McMahon Line on India-China boundary is "illegal", China said on Monday it is ready to work with India to resolve the vexed border issue at an early date through "friendly consultations" to create more favourable conditions for bilateral ties.

"The Chinese side holds a consistent and clear position on the eastern section of the China-India boundary," foreign ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said, reaffirming Beijing's claims on Arunachal Pradesh, which it says is a part of 'Southern Tibet'.

"The Chinese government does not recognise 'the McMahon Line', which is illegal," she said, reacting to national security advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval's remarks made at the KF Rustamji lecture in New Delhi recently.

"The Chinese side is ready to work with the Indian side to resolve the boundary question through friendly consultation at an early date and create more favourable conditions for the development of the bilateral relations," she said in a written response to a PTI query.

In his address on May 22, Doval said settlement of the border issue is "critical" for India-China ties and called for a "larger plan" for "tackling" the issue to resolve all contentious matters.

Doval, also the special representative of Sino-India boundary talks, said while ties with China are looking up, "we are particularly concerned about the Eastern sector where the claims have been made on Tawang (in Arunachal Pradesh) which is totally in contravention of accepted principles".

He also expressed surprise that while McMahon Line was agreed till Burma (Myanmar) by China, it was not accepted beyond it.

The line that was agreed to by Britain and Tibet as part of the 1914 Simla Accord is named after Sir Henry McMahon, foreign secretary of the British-run government of India and the chief negotiator of settling disputes with China.

"We have got a very long border, we have got 3,488km long border, a very difficult and mountainous terrain snow-clad... now for the bilateral relations with China, border is the critical and vital issue," Doval said.

In a guarded response, Hua skirted Doval's assertion that China recognised the McMahon Line in the case of Burma but not when it came to the Indian border.

She said "it is not easy to resolve the China-India boundary question, as it is an issue left over from history".

18 rounds of Special Representative talks between India-China so far to resolve the dispute "made important progress, laying a solid foundation for the continuous and steady growth of China-India relations", she said.

"During Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to China, the two sides reaffirmed their commitment to a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable solution to the boundary question by pressing ahead with the process of the special representatives' meeting," Hua said.


China doesn't recognise 'illegal' McMahon Line: Beijing responds to NSA Ajit Doval
 
.
China doesn't recognise 'illegal' McMahon Line: Beijing responds to NSA Ajit Doval
  • PTI, Beijing
    |
  • Updated: May 25, 2015 21:51 IST
6dcecafc-0858-4967-9026-c09aa2ae78c3wallpaper1.jpg

NSA Ajit Doval with China special representative on the India-China Boundary Question Yang Jiechi. (Virendra Singh Gosain/HT Photo)
  • 138
  • 47
  • Share2
Sticking to its stand that McMahon Line on India-China boundary is "illegal", China said on Monday it is ready to work with India to resolve the vexed border issue at an early date through "friendly consultations" to create more favourable conditions for bilateral ties.

"The Chinese side holds a consistent and clear position on the eastern section of the China-India boundary," foreign ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said, reaffirming Beijing's claims on Arunachal Pradesh, which it says is a part of 'Southern Tibet'.

"The Chinese government does not recognise 'the McMahon Line', which is illegal," she said, reacting to national security advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval's remarks made at the KF Rustamji lecture in New Delhi recently.

"The Chinese side is ready to work with the Indian side to resolve the boundary question through friendly consultation at an early date and create more favourable conditions for the development of the bilateral relations," she said in a written response to a PTI query.

In his address on May 22, Doval said settlement of the border issue is "critical" for India-China ties and called for a "larger plan" for "tackling" the issue to resolve all contentious matters.

Doval, also the special representative of Sino-India boundary talks, said while ties with China are looking up, "we are particularly concerned about the Eastern sector where the claims have been made on Tawang (in Arunachal Pradesh) which is totally in contravention of accepted principles".

He also expressed surprise that while McMahon Line was agreed till Burma (Myanmar) by China, it was not accepted beyond it.

The line that was agreed to by Britain and Tibet as part of the 1914 Simla Accord is named after Sir Henry McMahon, foreign secretary of the British-run government of India and the chief negotiator of settling disputes with China.

"We have got a very long border, we have got 3,488km long border, a very difficult and mountainous terrain snow-clad... now for the bilateral relations with China, border is the critical and vital issue," Doval said.

In a guarded response, Hua skirted Doval's assertion that China recognised the McMahon Line in the case of Burma but not when it came to the Indian border.

She said "it is not easy to resolve the China-India boundary question, as it is an issue left over from history".

18 rounds of Special Representative talks between India-China so far to resolve the dispute "made important progress, laying a solid foundation for the continuous and steady growth of China-India relations", she said.

"During Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to China, the two sides reaffirmed their commitment to a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable solution to the boundary question by pressing ahead with the process of the special representatives' meeting," Hua said.


China doesn't recognise 'illegal' McMahon Line: Beijing responds to NSA Ajit Doval
Liberate Northern Arunachal Pradesh (Tibet Then) So that Border dispute can be resolved for ever.
 
.
Why their tounge gets paralized and they cant speak up like how they usually react on media...
resolving border dispute is good for region but how india gonna tackle Kashmir which is between 3 of us.without solving Kashmir india is going to stuck and remain on ground. no one going to have war over border dispute since all of em have nuclear...
 
.
The McMahon Line was named after "Henry McMahon".

Why are all of India's borders named after white British people?

What right do the British have to draw lines in Asian lands and Asian territories? They are from halfway across the world.
 
.
The McMahon Line was named after "Henry McMahon".

Why are all of India's border lines named after white British people?

What right do the British have to draw lines in Asian lands and Asian territories? They are from halfway across the world.

They also made Pakistan and Bangladesh. They get that right because they ruled us.
 
. . .
The McMahon Line was named after "Henry McMahon".

Why are all of India's borders named after white British people?

What right do the British have to draw lines in Asian lands and Asian territories? They are from halfway across the world.

because British ruled china, India, Bangladesh, nepal, Pakistan, Bhutan. they know the boundaries better.
 
.
The McMahon Line was named after "Henry McMahon".

Why are all of India's borders named after white British people?

What right do the British have to draw lines in Asian lands and Asian territories? They are from halfway across the world.
It's a matter of time when China becomes too powerful by overtaking US economically that even the British will side with China and declared McMahon line draw by them is not valid. :D
 
.
Why their tounge gets paralized and they cant speak up like how they usually react on media...
resolving border dispute is good for region but how india gonna tackle Kashmir which is between 3 of us.without solving Kashmir india is going to stuck and remain on ground. no one going to have war over border dispute since all of em have nuclear...
Pakis better keep out and reserve their cheerleading for other threads. Using your masters logic ^^^^ even Durand Line is illegal and half of Pakistan belong to Afghanistan:laugh:
 
. . .
The McMahon Line was named after "Henry McMahon".

Why are all of India's borders named after white British people?

What right do the British have to draw lines in Asian lands and Asian territories? They are from halfway across the world.
The McMahon Line is fine in case of Burma but not in case of India ! CHinese logic!
 
.
you are comparing orange and apple. British ruled whole India while China has only Hong Kong under British rule.

Try harder.
china defeated in opium war and Chinese king forced to lease out Hong Kong to British for a lease period of 100 years.. it was more like surrender.unlike india, in 1800s china was unproductive land. unlike china, india was an agricultural country british were most interested in indian wealth, but they don't have any interest in china, they only want opium to sell in china. that is why british never tried to conquer mainland of china
 
.
Pakis better keep out and reserve their cheerleading for other threads. Using your masters logic ^^^^ even Durand Line is illegal and half of Pakistan belong to Afghanistan:laugh:
we will deal with our issues... its alright muslims belongs to muslims it doesnt matter even if we or they belong to muslims but there is 2 nation theory between us.. and we know how to protect ourselves...
i would like to see indian media how polietly they gonna speak just like waiters... :)
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom