Artillery strikes on Pakistan will only bring good PR. For impact, India needs more Balakots

[Ultima Thule]

Neutral Source ??

How Do that "Neutral Source" Will Know how many Shells are fired From Indian Artillery guns

until They get it from Military source ??

So you Are saying DAWN Will better know how on PA military affairs than ISPR ???

It neutral analysis by neutral expert from a country other than Pakistan and India, just like most of the western military experts did the neutral analysis of 65/71 wars between 2 countries

 

[Secularindian]

It neutral analysis by neutral expert from a country other than Pakistan and India, just like most of the western military experts did the neutral analysis of 65/71 wars between 2 countries

They Too Need Sources From Both Pakistan And Indian military sources

About Troop movements ,Battle Maps,Military briefing ,Equipment etc

How Will a third party Will get Knowledge about Indian Military

For example Pakistan Official body count in kargil war is 453

But By
Tavares, Rodrigo (2006). Understanding Regional Peace and Security. Göteborg University. p. 297. ISBN 978-9187380679. the US State Department quoted the Pakistani military casualties at 700, but according to the then PM Nawaz Sharif (quoted in Gulf News, February 2002), the entire Northern Light Infantry of Pakistan was wiped out during the conflict claiming 2,700 lives.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

LOL there nothing bigger fake than BBC which said WMD in Iraq And Syrian chemical weapons

Nevertheless how Would BBC knows such details About kargil war ???

By: SD Goswami, Defence Spokesperson (MOD)

"The Indian artillery fired over 2,50,000 shells, bombs and rockets during the Kargil conflict. Approximately 5,000 artillery sheels, mortar bombs and rockets were fired daily from 300 guns, mortars and MBRLs while 9,000 shells were fired the day Tiger Hill was regained. During the peak period of assaults, on an average, each artillery battery fired over one round per minute for 17 days continuously. Such high rates of fire over long periods had not been witnessed anywhere in the world since the ..


Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Another
By Maj Gen Jagjit Singh

http://www.indiandefencereview.com/spotlights/battle-winning-role-of-the-gunners-in-kargil-war/

As most indian sources are FAKE NEWS, do you ANY independent, credible, genuine, reliable and irrefutable sources that corroborate the above allegations and conjectures?

 

[Laozi]

They may have not, but indians do have a burning passion and hatred towards ALL Muslims and Islam. That is why they insult Islam and Muslims even when they are working in the Muslim Middle Eastern nations. They blame the Arabs for bringing Islam into india and oppressing hinduism and hindus. The reason why india hasn't gone to war with the Middle Eastern nations is that you don't have the capability or power to do so. Nothing more. If india had the power of America, Russia or China, they wouldn't hesitate to go to war with ALL Muslims nations. The sikhs religion is based on wanting to annihilate Islam and kill all Muslims.

1 India has more Muslims than you have in Pakistan.

2, India has never initiated an attack on any country.

3. Sikhism is based on Hinduism with equality for all. Guru Gobind ji ordered Sikhs to protect Hindus from the atrocities of tyrant rulers not to annihilate Islam or kill Muslims.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

They Too Need Sources From Both Pakistan And Indian military sources

About Troop movements ,Battle Maps,Military briefing ,Equipment etc

How Will a third party Will get Knowledge about Indian Military

For example Pakistan Official body count in kargil war is 453

But By
Tavares, Rodrigo (2006). Understanding Regional Peace and Security. Göteborg University. p. 297. ISBN 978-9187380679. the US State Department quoted the Pakistani military casualties at 700, but according to the then PM Nawaz Sharif (quoted in Gulf News, February 2002), the entire Northern Light Infantry of Pakistan was wiped out during the conflict claiming 2,700 lives.

Were are the cross references that support those assertions listed above?

 

[Sine Nomine]

In a mist of self created economic crisis...i dont think peoplr had a gut to stand for it and poor are already hungry..
Now you know the importance of economy ..
Build upon manufacturing not services, trade and remittances

You won't match enemy dime for a dime in this field and economic mismanagement goes back atleast a half century.
If you find an excuse to run from fight every time,better end this show down for good.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

1 India has more Muslims than you have in Pakistan.

2, India has never initiated an attack on any country.

3. Sikhism is based on Hinduism with equality for all. Guru Gobind ji ordered Sikhs to protect Hindus from the atrocities of tyrant rulers not to annihilate Islam or kill Muslims.

Can you prove those assertions listed above with credible and genuine evidence?

 

[Ultima Thule]

They Too Need Sources From Both Pakistan And Indian military sources

About Troop movements ,Battle Maps,Military briefing ,Equipment etc

How Will a third party Will get Knowledge about Indian Military

For example Pakistan Official body count in kargil war is 453

But By
Tavares, Rodrigo (2006). Understanding Regional Peace and Security. Göteborg University. p. 297. ISBN 978-9187380679. the US State Department quoted the Pakistani military casualties at 700, but according to the then PM Nawaz Sharif (quoted in Gulf News, February 2002), the entire Northern Light Infantry of Pakistan was wiped out during the conflict claiming 2,700 lives.

ok ok, i am not entering this endless and useless debate here, you're right, Now happy, case closed

 

[Jackdaws]

They may have not, but indians do have a burning passion and hatred towards ALL Muslims and Islam. That is why they insult Islam and Muslims even when they are working in the Muslim Middle Eastern nations. They blame the Arabs for bringing Islam into india and oppressing hinduism and hindus. The reason why india hasn't gone to war with the Middle Eastern nations is that you don't have the capability or power to do so. Nothing more. If india had the power of America, Russia or China, they wouldn't hesitate to go to war with ALL Muslims nations. The sikhs religion is based on wanting to annihilate Islam and kill all Muslims.

Lol. And what is your source for this analysis? If India was so against Islam or Muslim countries - how come entire OIC is unable to pass resolutions against India whenever Pakistan wants? We've supported the Palestinian cause when you were busy filling Israeli coffers with money to buy weapons.

No one has appointed Pakistan the flag bearer of Islam. More Muslims die in violence in Pakistan than in India.

 

[Secularindian]

Were are the cross references that support those assertions listed above?

"India had fully retaken the Kargil heights by 26 July. It lost more than 500 men in the war, while estimates for Pakistani losses range from 400 to about 4,000."

www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49101016

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Lol. And what is your source for this analysis? If India was so against Islam or Muslim countries - how come entire OIC is unable to pass resolutions against India whenever Pakistan wants? We've supported the Palestinian cause when you were busy filling Israeli coffers with money to buy weapons.

No one has appointed Pakistan the flag bearer of Islam. More Muslims die in violence in Pakistan than in India.

OIC is as irrelevant as SAARC. india has the power to destroy indian Muslims but they don't have the power to take on Muslim nations militarily or to even attack us. india doesn't have the power, ability or the IQ that America, Russia and China has. indians would like to because of the crimes indian hindus and sikhs perceive that the Muslims from the Middle East and Central Asia did to them for centuries.


Are you seriously suggesting that indians don't hate Islam and Muslims?.........

"India had fully retaken the Kargil heights by 26 July. It lost more than 500 men in the war, while estimates for Pakistani losses range from 400 to about 4,000."

www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49101016

The above is an opinion piece rather than factual information. There are NO cross references to confirm or prove the assertions by the author. It is very ambiguous.

 

[Jackdaws]

OIC is as irrelevant as SAARC. india has the power to destroy indian Muslims but they don't have the power to take on Muslim nations militarily or to even attack us. india doesn't have the power, ability or the IQ that America, Russia and China has. indians would like to because of the crimes indian hindus and sikhs perceive that the Muslims from the Middle East and Central Asia did to them for centuries.


Are you seriously suggesting that indians don't hate Islam and Muslims?.........







The above is an opinion piece rather than factual information. There are NO cross references to confirm or prove the assertions by the author. It is very ambiguous.

Lol. If anything, most Muslim nations support India. No, we don't have anything against Islam or Muslims. You kill more Muslims in Pakistan in violence than India does even though the number of Muslims in both countries are the same. How many Muslims have died in lynching in India? Maybe 20? Pakistanis kill more Muslims in each bomb blast in their sectarian violence. So don't cry for Islam or Muslims. Walk the talk.

 

[Secularindian]

The above is an opinion piece rather than factual information. There are NO cross references to confirm or prove the assertions by the author. It is very ambiguous.

LOL Your is source My is opinion Piece ???

But Its BBC

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

LOL Your is source My is opinion Piece ???

But Its BBC

But there is no cross referencing to support his claims.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

"India had fully retaken the Kargil heights by 26 July. It lost more than 500 men in the war, while estimates for Pakistani losses range from 400 to about 4,000."

www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49101016

You're quoting M Ilyas Khan. He is notorious for his anti-Pakistani military views. All he ever cites in his reports are "his sources" or "his own anecdotal evidence". Has he cited any professional body of work to justify his claims?

M Ilyas Khan has sanghees jumping. Hilarious.