What's new

Arnab Goswami vs Dr.Zakir Naik | Must Watch | Times Now

You are actually distorting his video to justify this illegal ban on peace tv by Hindu nationalist..picking one old video out of context while ignoring dozen others who speak against ISIS a, terrorism and killing of any innocent civilians..

If someone has 99 peaceful or neutral videos but also 1 or 2 vile hate speech videos supporting terrorism....it somehow does not constitute hate speech because of the other 99?

You add some poison to milk and honey....will it still be milk and honey fit for consumption?

If he is such a good guy why does this one video exist?

Hate speechers are free to contradict themselves....but it does not remove that they indulged in hate speech.

Even today he can come out and clarify he did not mean the entire US in his hate speech video....and that he meant terrorism in a certain context blah blah blah....BUT HAS HE? Simply diverting to ISIS and rejection of killing innocents while ignoring what he himself said which can easily be interpreted as regarding the terrorizing of the entire US prima facie does not wash his hands.

even i would be happy to live in America if i got job there..
what i was referring was the policies destructive policies of USA which they played in South America, Asia, ME and Africa..

You really think we would be having favourable views of the US mostly while thinking they are the biggest terrorist....having faced what real terrorism is on our soil originating in most cases from a certain country?
 
.
If someone has 99 peaceful or neutral videos but also 1 or 2 vile hate speech videos supporting terrorism....it somehow does not constitute hate speech because of the other 99?

You add some poison to milk and honey....will it still be milk and honey fit for consumption?

If he is such a good guy why does this one video exist?

Hate speechers are free to contradict themselves....but it does not remove that they indulged in hate speech.

Even today he can come out and clarify he did not mean the entire US in his hate speech video....and that he meant terrorism in a certain context blah blah blah....BUT HAS HE? Simply diverting to ISIS and rejection of killing innocents while ignoring what he himself said which can easily be interpreted as regarding the terrorizing of the entire US prima facie does not wash his hands.
Listen video again and tell me where he justified the killing of any innocent civilians or justified the terrorist attack 9/11.. He is saying that whatever you hear about osama and terrorism you hear through western media and you cannot verify any of these terrorist acts which they associate with osama but act of killing any civilian is against Islam irrespective of who does it blair, bush. osama, ISIS ..concept of physical jihad in islam is to fight against those who are aggressor so thats where he said every Muslim should terrorise the terrorists
 
.
Listen video again and tell me where he justified the killing of any innocent civilians or justified the terrorist attack 9/11.. He is saying that whatever you hear about osama and terrorism you hear through western media and you cannot verify any of these terrorist acts which they associate with osama but act of killing any civilian is against Islam irrespective of who does it blair, bush. osama, ISIS ..concept of physical jihad in islam is to fight against those who are aggressor so thats where he said every Muslim should terrorise the terrorists

"IF he is terrorising the terrorist, America the biggest terrorist, I am with him"

"Every Muslim should be a terrorist, the thing is if he terrorizing a terrorist, he is following islam".

That is hate speech no matter what context you try to spin it with. He clearly gives the impression that you can simply label an entire country (he did not specify otherwise, neither did he later clarify) as a terrorist ...and that it is then justified to commit terrorism on such a terrorist (again an entire country).

You really think the Bangaldeshi hackers and other Islam-based terrorists stop to think about what might be other contexts of what America might mean or what terrorism might mean esp in the context of OBL?

He will be taken to task. As a non-Indian it is non of your business anyway. It is how the govt and supreme court of India now proceed that matters to Zakir Naik and the Indian population.
 
.
Arnab Goswami is such an idiot but his interviews are very entertaining.

Lol! All clips he showed of Dr Naik are extremely conciliatory and great arguments to brings Muslims and Hindus together. And the idiot anchor is shouting at the top of voice to ban Zakir Naik!!
 
.
LOL...putting together the best of ZN debates with heated arguments by Arnab is hilarious. AG is a journalist, its his style to pump up the heat during debates. It gives him TRPs.

ZN is a televangelist. Its his job to sound rational. He can not sound loud and ruthless to his would be converts.

As far as content of ZN debates go, he has been proved an idiot time and again in various youtube videos. Just type Zakir Naik Idiot in youtube and you will get to see his idiocy filled debates. He is just a Islamic supremacist who demeans other religions under the garb of interfaith harmony.
 
.
Zakir Naik might have some horrible views but he is smart enough to wrap those views in a presentable manner....Goswami is absolute shit...he would make even perfectly sane points seem stupid with all that shouting....he seems to be trying to copy Bill O'Reilly but even Bill knows his limits.
 
. .
I agree Zakir Naik should be banned based on hated speech along taking the context into the account. What about Indian medias? that anchor? communal party? Federal government of India?

Judging by the lines, They all promote hatred in all angles. From the government to the medias, hatred is only thing heavily promoted. Shouldn't they all be banned by that angle alone?

Ban Modi. Ban Arnab. Ban Indian soldiers in Kashmir. Ban Indian communal parties. Ban Indian medias. Ban rape capital [India]. In fact, ban everything India stands for which is hatred boiled to terrorism, genocide, oppression, rape, minority mistreatment, inequality [high caste/low caste] and injustice.
 
.
I still don't understand how his speeches are "hate speech"...being a atheist there are very few people in the world I disagree with more than ZN....and yes he does indirectly support terrorism(or maybe going by his twisted definition of terrorism he seems to support insurgency)....but still I don't get why he is being blamed fro "hate speech".
 
.
Arnab is Arnab . He is a special case . Never raised the issue of Zakir himself and now blaming it on Politicians . There have been many complaints in the past .

But again what he is saying is based on some evidence . Zakir might be smart and intelligent but he is no where near wise . He has spoken many things that are nothing more than argument ad POPULUM
 
.
Since I loathe both the rascals, any comment by me is likely to attract the unfavourable attention of the moderators. Pass.

When you cannot find any fault of your adversary drag him down to your level, nice going!

I dont watch Arnab Goswami and his primetime.

But you definitely know how much he hates Zakir, right? When Zakir is hated so strongly by a scum like arnab goswami he (Zakir) must be doing something right.
 
.
When you cannot find any fault of your adversary drag him down to your level, nice going!



But you definitely know how much he hates Zakir, right? When Zakir is hated so strongly by a scum like arnab goswami he (Zakir) must be doing something right.
I am not going to defend Arnab and I am certainly not going to defend Zakir.
NIA and the other investigation agencies will decide if Zakir is guilty or not. As for Arnab I dont really agrees with his style of journalism.
 
.
Both of them are among most hated Indian.

Arnab - For his weird moderation skills.

Jakir - For his soft Terrorism skills and his retard conspiracy theories.
 
. .
even most of the indian will agree with that that USA is the biggest terrorist.. the way they played in South America, ASIA, ME and Africa is nothing but to create unrest and insecurity in that Regions...

Let us assume they are, why shall Indian muslims go and terrorize/kill westerners?

We do not need people who provoke our population and divert them from meaningful and progressive work they are doing.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom