WRONG!!! Arjun has clearly beat the T-90 in every comparative trail conducted- this is a FACT. There were issues with the Arjun yes but they have now been rectified and the Arjun Mk2 is arguably one of the finest tanks in the world. The fact is though that as a MBT the Arjun is huge and very heavy just like the Abrams or Challenger. But because a huge number of T-90 and T-72 are in service or were ordered the infrastructure and support is all geared around 40 ton tanks not 55-60+ ton tanks so it will take time for the proper infrastructure to be put in place so the Arjun can be ordered in larger numbers. Additionally at ~$10 million USD a peice the Arjun is signifcantly more expensive than the T-90 but naturally more capable- time will only tell whether the IA is happy to take the leap to order greater numbers of Arjuns and develop the infrastructure and support packages that go with this beast but to call the Arjun a failed project is incredibly inaccurate.
y u care to explain to ppl who have nothing to show in term of developing military hardware...... they hardly understand difference between builidng on ToT and Developing something from scratch ......Thats y anytime a glitch comes they term it as a Failure
One wise man said
"If you are not making mistakes, you are not doing it right at all or you r simply not doing it "
A life spent making mistakes is not only more honorable, but more useful than a life spent doing nothing.------------George Bernard Shaw