What's new

Army chief warns against govt-to-govt deals with US

sudhir007

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
4,728
Reaction score
1
Army chief warns against govt-to-govt deals with US - India - The Times of India

NEW DELHI: For the first time since India began big-ticket defence purchases from the US through government-to-government route, a senior member of the security establishment has red-flagged them, calling attention to the serious pitfalls of it.

In an unusual reflection of Army's frustration with its past FMS (foreign military sales) purchases from the US, Army chief General V K Singh has written to defence minister A K Antony, cautioning the government about the troubles with FMS.

Over the past few years, the Indian defence establishment has been using the FMS programme of the US government to carry out major defence acquisitions.

In these non-tender purchases, the US government procures the equipment on behalf of the Indian government from its military companies, and takes a commission for the services rendered through Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA).

The purchase of AN/TPQ-37 firefinder weapon-locating radars for the Army in 2002 was the first major deal that India did with the US under FMS in several decades. Ever since, India has been buying several major defence systems regularly, and the total contract value of US systems bought under the FMS deal runs into several billion dollars.

The Army chief's letter of caution comes at a time when the two sides are in the final stages of finalizing two major FMS purchases — one for the Army and the other for the IAF. The Army is proposing to buy 145 ultra light howitzers worth about $647 million, mostly for deployment along the China border, while the IAF is planning to buy 10 C-17 transport aircraft at a cost of over $2.2 billion.

Singed by the troubles with past FMS contracts, the Army top brass is now discussing the possibility of hiring corporate lawyers well versed in international negotiations and contracts to come on board for scrutinizing the upcoming contract for howitzers, authoritative sources said. These lawyers would ensure that the past troubles are kept away, source said.

Gen Singh is believed to have pointed out to Antony Army's trouble with maintenance of a dozen weapon-locating radars bought from the US firm Raytheon. At times, up to two-thirds of the radars have been in want of maintenance, Army sources said.

Gen Singh's letter to Antony is an unusual step, and was "forced by the troubles we have with maintenance of the radar systems", an Army source said.

India has been using the non-tender, FMS route to buy big-ticket defence items from the US since 2002, when the radars became the first items to be bought under the scheme in recent memory. Over the past eight years, the military has carried out a host of acquisitions through the route. Among them were the $2.21 billion purchase of eight Boeing P-8I maritime reconnaissance aircraft, $962 million deal for six C-130J Hercules transport aircraft for IAF and $88 million for USS Trenton and accompanying helicopters for the Navy.

The IAF is currently in the final stages of negotiations for purchase of $2.2 billion worth 10 C-17 aircraft and the Army is finalizing the purchase of howitzers.
 
. .
I don't know much about it except what the OP reports, but if I were an Indian I would take the words of the Indian Army COS to heart.

Between dealing with my country's defence contractors and greedy governments bureaucrats, the idea of hiring some good attorneys to watch your back seems like a good idea.
 
Last edited:
.
ToI , not interested.

I stand by my words :lol:

Army denies cautioning Antony on deals with US - Express India

Army denies cautioning Antony on deals with US

New Delhi The Indian Army's Additional Directorate General (Public Information) at the General Staff Branch of the Integrated Headquarters of the Ministry of Defence said on Tuesday that a news report suggesting that the Chief of Army Staff, General V K Singh, had warned Defence Minister A K Antony on going ahead with Government to Government deals with the US was wrong and based on "hearsay".
Additional Director General (Public Information) Major General Sanjeev Madhok said in a release: "The article mentions a letter written by the Chief of Army Staff to the Hon'ble Raksha Mantri Shri A K Antony on Foreign Military Sales (FMS). The news item is based on hearsay."

The article reported that General Singh had red-flagged the FMS purchases from the US, and written to Antony, cautioning him about problems that he counter with the FMS.

Over the past several years, the Indian defence establishment has been using the FMS programme of the US Government for major defence acquisitions.

In these non-tender purchases, the US Government procures the equipment on behalf of the Indian Government from its military companies, and takes a commission for the services rendered through the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA).Army denies cautioning Antony on deals with US

New Delhi The Indian Army's Additional Directorate General (Public Information) at the General Staff Branch of the Integrated Headquarters of the Ministry of Defence said on Tuesday that a news report suggesting that the Chief of Army Staff, General V K Singh, had warned Defence Minister A K Antony on going ahead with Government to Government deals with the US was wrong and based on "hearsay".
Additional Director General (Public Information) Major General Sanjeev Madhok said in a release: "The article mentions a letter written by the Chief of Army Staff to the Hon'ble Raksha Mantri Shri A K Antony on Foreign Military Sales (FMS). The news item is based on hearsay."

The article reported that General Singh had red-flagged the FMS purchases from the US, and written to Antony, cautioning him about problems that he counter with the FMS.

Over the past several years, the Indian defence establishment has been using the FMS programme of the US Government for major defence acquisitions.

In these non-tender purchases, the US Government procures the equipment on behalf of the Indian Government from its military companies, and takes a commission for the services rendered through the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA).

Now , ToI is just making up stuff.

They are nothing but tabloid newspaper.

Stop posting their articles already.
 
.
ToI , not interested.

Actually TOI is a much more reputed source than LiveFest , idrw or Expressindia , since they are little more than just Blogs
While TOI is the second most read newspaper in india after Hindustan Times
 
.
Actually TOI is a much more reputed source than LiveFest , idrw or Expressindia , since they are little more than just Blogs
While TOI is the second most read newspaper in india after Hindustan Times

Clearly you Don't read ToI.

If you did , you would know those blogs are better sources of information than that newspaper
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom