We as in the Armenian people.....and you have no idea who I am.
it's only the internet and we're on a forum. Wouldnt expect to know you.
For proper borders of Turkey and Armenia see Wilson Arbitration in connection with the Sevres treaty…it really doesn’t matter, we don’t expect Turkey to give our lands back without a fight. We (Armenians) make no claim on current Turkish occupied lands.
are you sure you aren't Kurdish?
Kurds claim areas of Turkiye, so do Armenians -- both these groups claim ownership over provinces like Van. That is ridiculous. First of all, Turkish Republic is a sovereign country; who is armenia to call it occupied lands?
I am also confused about your loyalties; do they belong to armenian or to Iran? It's a personal question, I may be out of line by asking. But I am very curious to know.
Is Turkey still butthurt from loosing the diplomatic battle in the Armenian-Turkish protocol deal that Russia, France, and US backed Armenia’s side?
losing?????
they didnt!!!!!!! And in all honesty, and allow me to be very frank with you -- the Armenian lobby in Washington seems to have its undies caught up in a bunch. They are politicizing the issue just for cheap publicity; the truth is, it is the job of HISTORIANS to do research on the matter. You wont get sympathy by going to Congress and trying to get them to label it ''genocide'' to appease Armenians.
I thought the Turks claim that it was the Armenians who Genocided Turks?
I think that during the fall of the Ottoman Empire -- EVERYONE was getting killed; Turks, Armenians, Kurds included.
By the way, given that Armenians were defecting to soviets and betraying the Ottomans --it seems natural that they would have been under a ''watchful eye'' no?
Azerbaijan was given to Ataturk by Stalin to please him….there was no Azeri nation before that.
okay, but the Azeri-Turks were still there, they didn't just magically appear
it's irrelevant though, soviet union is about as passe as telegrams and the Ford Model T
Check history books, not Turkish history books. Turkey name changed after the collapse of Ottoman Empire and their defeat in WWI where Islam was replaced brutally with secularism.
Islam was replaced, but not suppressed. Ataturk didnt want religion to play a key role in national affairs. I think he had contempt for Arabs, not for Islam itself. But he feared the effects of Islamists becoming TOO MUCH powerful in state affairs. And I personally think he did the right thing, since I too believe that religion and state shouldnt be necessarily inter-twined, except for some legal/family/financial matters which cannot be neglected.