TeesraIndiotHunter
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2014
- Messages
- 722
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
"Armor Disadvantage" Do you mean Alkhalid is better than T90?
No, I didn't mean that. However it is true though. Even basic Al Khalid is better than T90...and today, Pakistan has Al Khalid-1, not just basic Al Khalid. Before you go about disputing my claim, visit the thread where senior members discussed Pakistani tanks and their comparison to other modern tanks. In that thread, senior Russian members themselves accept that Al Khalid is slightly superior to T90...
Moreover, over-all, Pakistan land forces have an advantage over india when it comes to artillery, armor sector etc. Once Bofors come in, and Arjuns are deployed in large numbers, then the gap will narrow...but as of now, Pakistani strike forces will "enjoy" fighting a ground war with india..but then again, there are other variables in which indians have advantage. So it is all paper talk. What happens in "real" war is something no one can predict.
We don't buy T-90 from Russia, we buy the license and build it here. BTW, it's good you bought Al-khalid
from China otherwise you wouldn't have an army worth mentioning.
You bought T-90s from Russia. "License production" doesn't mean that the product is yours.
Al Khalid is indigenous Pakistani tank. Your crying won't do much for you. It only exposes the true character of a worthless nation.
All crying and bitching while very little to show.
Al Khalid-1 is as Pakistani and Arjun is indian. If Al Khalid is Chinese than Arjun is Srilankan.
And sadly, india STILL doesn't have an army worth mentioning
Until a few years, your junkard ill-trained army and their junkard tanks were falling in the wells!!!
Should I post that news to embarrass you further?