What's new

Argentina Considering To Purchase 12 JF17C Worth 664Million Dollars

. . . .
with UN concerns over 54 countries who need a relief in crisis brewing since few years and with COVID and current Ukrainian crisis with a debt around USD800 billion. Argentina is one of three including Venezuela and Ukraine who share one third of this USD800 billion debt.

what are the chances of this purchase?
 
.
When Chinese said they have built a stealth fighter, I was naturally curious. When I saw it there was Mig 1.44 finger prints all over it. This is not new for China I thought. They bought Lavi fighter jet design and made J10. I wouldn't be surprised if they did the same with J20. However, this new stealth plane is freaking huge. No wonder they needed to have those canards on the front for additional lift. If USAF with all their experience are having trouble operating stealth fighters in terms of cost then you bet Chinese would be having problems too not only in terms of cost but also technology. There is no way J20 would be effective without powerful engines. Even with powerful engines J20 cannot go super sonic for long periods of time. Going supersonic for long periods will result in structural damage and loss of stealth capabilities. This is a problem in F-35 too.Former USAF pilots called F-35 a fat whale when it was in the design and production phase. These guys grew up in the era of dog fights. So they didn't really catch up on the technological progress. F-35 sure is a huge *** plane. But the plane is packed with sensors and all sorts of goodies for a pilot to never engage in a dog fight. Even then F-35 is way too expensive to operate even for USAF. It costs $30,000 - $35,000 per hour to operate F-35. And USAF wants to induct 2,500 F-35's by 2040.
The other factors like J20 only having frontal stealth and whether their avionics, sensor fusion, AESA radar are up to the standards of 5th generation fighters? We don't have much idea on those. Operating J20 in many different climatic conditions must also be a pain the *** I reckon. In February 2022, it was revealed that the aircraft’s aspiration to host Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) had run into trouble owing to its underpowered engines. Questions have also been raised on China’s ability to produce purpose-built engines on a war footing


I don't usually discuss potential flaws of Chinese fighters on PDF but I will make this one exception. See below image, do you see the fuselage above the wing root of the J11 reinforced with metal panels. Do you know why this is done?

View attachment 884791
This is because the gas injection system frequently goes out of sync with the chambering mechanism of the canon. This causes the round to misfire and strike the fuselage. A design flaw of the original Su-27 inherited by all copies of the original. If the J-11 were truly Chinese this issue would have been addressed instead of "patched" with a clumsy wo
More talk, less knowledge.
 
.
This thread has been derailed by some Indian Trolls @Admins, where are you?

Untitled-1 copy.jpg
 
. . .
Does uk care when it sells military equipment to india ?
Besides its China thats selling it not Pakistan
But UK will deem Pakistan collaborating this sales with such openness by hosting Argentina air chief.

Will UK retaliate by totally banning any Martin Barker ejection seats for PAF J-17 future fleet?
 
.
But UK will deem Pakistan collaborating this sales with such openness by hosting Argentina air chief.

Will UK retaliate by totally banning any Martin Barker ejection seats for PAF J-17 future fleet?
And lose one of their biggest customer?
 
. .
But UK will deem Pakistan collaborating this sales with such openness by hosting Argentina air chief.

Will UK retaliate by totally banning any Martin Barker ejection seats for PAF J-17 future fleet?
They will provide lip service with a verbal displeasure, but that will be the end of it....Martin baker won't be loosing any business n even if they do.....we would go for the Chinese option in an all Chinese plane. Afterall we are using it in the J 10
 
.
But UK will deem Pakistan collaborating this sales with such openness by hosting Argentina air chief.

Will UK retaliate by totally banning any Martin Barker ejection seats for PAF J-17 future fleet?

There is a reason why the UK/US have changed the government in Pakistan.
there is a reason why UK has and still is providing refuge to people who have stolen money from Pakistan and invested in the UK.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom