What's new

Are Kashmiris going to be sold down the river ?

Skeptic786

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
A significant new element in the joint statement is the two sides' decision to "put in place an Pakistan-India anti-terrorism institutional mechanism to identify and implement counter-terrorism initiatives and investigations." On the face of it, this looks like a concession on Pakistan's part to India.

http://www.brecorder.com/index.php?id=477157&currPageNo=1&query=&search=&term=&supDate=




does this mean Pakistan will help india to eliminate Kashmiri freedom fighters?
 
.
No but it will try to ask them to choose their targets better. Collateral damage is something we cannot afford while "FREEING" Kashmir. Can't even mistakably kill them and free them now can we?

Either one should manage to target the Indian army ONLY or one should not have the finger on the trigger.
 
.
No but it will try to ask them to choose their targets better. Collateral damage is something we cannot afford while "FREEING" Kashmir. Can't even mistakably kill them and free them now can we?

Either one should manage to target the Indian army ONLY or one should not have the finger on the trigger.

yes ofcourse we cannot afford or tolerate the killing of civilians.

But my question was more towards the fact that is mushy going to share information with the indians so they can simply round up...yesterday's freedom fighters ( the like that was allegded against BB and more specificially aitzaz---who was said to have given lists of sikhs to the indian government...based upon which they were able to crush the khalistan movement ( i stress this is allegation that is raised against BB and aitzaz ).
 
.
I'd love to see someone say that Pakistan is supporting militancy in Kashmir and 'selling out' Kashmir at the same time. Anti-Pakistani hypocrites, lets see your true colours!
 
.
I'd love to see someone say that Pakistan is supporting militancy in Kashmir and 'selling out' Kashmir at the same time. Anti-Pakistani hypocrites, lets see your true colours!

india has more than once asked for the handing over of syed salahudin...head of hizbul mujahdeen, who moved to AJK but belongs to IOK. Mushy's is on record for calling people engaged with indian troops as freedom fighters......so is he now going to re-label them as terrorist. after india has called the whole issue of kashmir cross border terrorism for the last 50 years.

hypocrites are people like you who try to be more mushy than mushy himself. mushy is going wild in giving concessions to india....without even extracting a tiny bit from their side.
 
.
'Nobody can hand me over to India'

The Rediff Interview | Hizb-ul Mujahideen leader Syed Salahuddin

http://www.rediff.com/news/2006/aug/08inter.htm

August 08, 2006
The Kashmir issue can never be resolved through talks, believes Syed Salahuddin, leader of the Hizb-ul Mujahideen terrorist group, and chairman of the Jihad Council, an umbrella outfit comprising over a dozen Kashmiri terrorist groups.

Salahuddin -- whose real name is Syed Mohammad Yusuf Shah -- is on a list of people India wants extradited from Pakistan in order to sustain the Indo-Pak peace process.

Born in Soibug village in Budgam district, 15 km from Srinagar, in December 1946, Salahuddin's maternal grandfather Gulla Saheb was a wellknown spiritual figure who took interest in his education and upbringing. His father Ghulam Rasool Shah was a farmer.

Salahuddin composed poetry in English, became an impressive debater and got a first class in Inter Science (now Class 12), but failed to get admission in a medical college.

He graduated in arts from the SP College and received a master's degree in political science from the University of Kashmir in 1971. A year later, he was appointed Amir-e-Tehsil in Budgam and later the Chief Nazime-Aala of the Tehreek-i-Talabe, the Jammat-e-Islami's students wing.

In 1986, he was appointed district Amir Jammat-e-Islami, Srinagar, and got a ticket for the assembly election in March 1987 as a candidate of the Muslim United Front, which later transformed into the All-Parties Hurriyat Conference. Just before the votes were counted, he was arrested along with other MUF campaigners. He was released from prison after nine months. Thereafter, he drifted into militancy and in April 1991, was appointed supreme commander of the Hizb-ul Mujahideen.

In an exclusive interview with Mohammad Shehzad in Pakistan occupied Kashmir, Salahuddin dares Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf to extradite him to India.

The Musharraf regime has taken some unbelievable U-turns like ditching the Taliban and throwing Dr A Q Khan into the dustbin. How would you react if it took a U-turn on you?

Pakistan's security, defence and sovereignty is strongly linked with all the freedom fighters of Kashmir.

India's demand that 'Salahuddin' or any other mujahid is handed over to them is absurd because 'Salahuddin' is living on his land, Azad Kashmir, which is a liberated part of Jammu and Kashmir.

Therefore, every Kashmiri has the right to live either in Occupied (what Pakistanis call Jammu and Kashmir) Kashmir or Azad (Pakistan-occupied) Kashmir.

Every Kashmiri can cross the khooni lakeer (the Line of Control). Therefore, it is impossible for the Musharraf regime to take a U-turn on me.

But we thought that a U-turn was not possible on Afghanistan, on A Q Khan. Mullah Zaeef, the former ambassador of the Taliban, was arrested and handed over to the US. If the Musharraf regime was to hand you over to India or the US, what would you do?

Mullah Zaeef was a different case. He was an Afghan national. He was on Pakistan's territory. I am a Kashmiri. Till this moment, the international community acknowledges Azad Kashmir as part of Kashmir. It recognises the legal, diplomatic, political and moral standing of Kashmiris. The Taliban did not enjoy such privilege.

On the Kashmir issue, the Musharraf regime cannot take a u-turn.

Of late you have been accusing the Musharraf regime of taking a U-turn on Kashmir...

That is a different thing. Kashmir is an indigenous movement. Pakistan is a party to it. It is Pakistan's responsibility to provide every kind of support to this movement -- although till to date Pakistan has been giving it diplomatic, moral and political support.

We want Pakistan to initiate military intervention in Kashmir just like India. It is a different issue that Pakistan does not do so. Pakistan is justified to do so. Kashmiris are disgruntled with Pakistan for not initiating military intervention.

You should not be over-optimistic. The Musharraf regime is capable of doing anything...

I have full faith that nobody can take a U-turn on Kashmir. Nobody can hand me over to India.

What gives you this faith?

I have this faith because my living in Azad Kashmir is like living in occupied Kashmir. I am justified in living in Azad Kashmir. No law in the world can make anyone extradite me.

What has your 'jihad' in Kashmir achieved so far?

The Kashmiris have been fighting 750,000 Indian troops for the last 16 years. Despite having state-of-the-art weapons including the atom bomb, the Indians have failed to cause a slightest dent in our movement. Now the Indian generals are telling the Indian leaders that there is no military solution to Kashmir.

India is spending Rs 52 crores per day in Kashmir. Keep in mind that more than 45 crore people live below the poverty line in India.

India's economy is becoming stronger and its reputation is improving. The US is signing a nuclear deal with India. India has become the hub of IT technology. On the other hand, Pakistan's reputation is at its lowest ebb.

I agree that Pakistan's reputation is falling down; that the Indian economy is improving; that the US is signing a nuclear deal with India. But does all this mean that we should give up our stance on Kashmir? We -- the Kashmiris -- have only one option. To do or die!

So you think the Kashmir issue will be resolved only through jihad? All international disputes were resolved through a political process.

India, including the international community that has (British Prime Minister Tony) Blair, (US President George) Bush, (French President Jacques) Chirac and (German Chancellor Angela) Merkel, have wasted the opportunity of political dialogue by not responding to General Musharraf's Confidence Building Measures.

The international community did not support Musharraf. It supported India. The role of the international community is condemnable.

So what will happen now?

We are above 'what will happen!' We will continue to fight the Indians and make sacrifices. Our conviction is we will liberate Kashmir through jihad like Afghanistan.

There are no American dollars behind the Kashmir 'jihad'...

American dollars arrived when jihad gained roots in Afghanistan. Before that, the mujahideen sold their goats to buy weapons. Kashmir will never be resolved through talks.

So what are the options?

Pakistan should provide Kashmiris 'substantial support'.

What do you mean by 'substantial support?'

The entire world knows what 'substantial support' is. It does not require an explanation. It should be in addition to diplomatic, political and moral support -- to make this movement meaningful.

How long will this 'substantial support' resolve the Kashmir issue?

One year, five years, ten years, hundred years... Decades don't matter in freedom movements. They go on for centuries. We are very close to freedom. India has realised that if Kashmir is not resolved soon, the militancy will spiral out of Kashmir and spread to other parts of the country.

Who is financing your movement?

The Kashmiris! There are more than 5 million Kashmiris living around the world. They are supporting our cause.
 
.
1. hypocrites are people like you who try to be more mushy than mushy himself. mushy is going wild in giving concessions to india....without even extracting a tiny bit from their side.

1. Terrorims is the deliberate targetting of civilians, how is Pak. coperation in this matter distasteful or in any way a concession? Musharraf supports those fight for their freedom, but only if it is conducted according to the rules of war.
 
.
1. Terrorims is the deliberate targetting of civilians, how is Pak. coperation in this matter distasteful or in any way a concession? Musharraf supports those fight for their freedom, but only if it is conducted according to the rules of war.

yes i am aware of what terrorism is...and see my post above (number 3) what i said about killing of civilians....not acceptable at all.

the problems arises as to what india has been describing kashmiri freedom fighters as....in the international arena....as well as at home.
if mushy was to concede to their definaton of terrorist then i cannot think of a bigger U turn done by mushy or indeed in the history of pakistan in the last 59 years.
 
.
Aziz calls for flexibility to seek Kashmir solution

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz has said recent meeting between President Pervez Musharraf and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Havana will help in leading the dialogue to conflict resolution from the confidence building measures.

Addressing a seminar in Islamabad Shaukat Aziz said that Pakistan is consistently pursuing composite dialogue process with India to resolve all the disputes including the core issue of Jammu and Kashmir.

The Prime Minister said Pakistan stands for an amicable resolution of the Kashmir issue acceptable to all three parties - Pakistan, India and the Kashmiris. He called for flexibility to seek solution of the Kashmir dispute.

http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp#10022

what flexibility has india offered so far???
 
.
1 the problems arises as to what india has been describing kashmiri freedom fighters as....in the international arena....as well as at home.
if mushy was to concede to their definaton of terrorist then i cannot think of a bigger U turn done by mushy or indeed in the history of pakistan in the last 59 years.


1. He hasnt, and he wont. It would be political suicide for him to do so. He's just saying that planting bombs targettng civilians is just not on and that Pak. will cooperate with India against such behaviour. He hasnt said that there will be coperation for IED's against Indian troops.
 
.
1. He hasnt, and he wont. It would be political suicide for him to do so. He's just saying that planting bombs targettng civilians is just not on and that Pak. will cooperate with India against such behaviour. He hasnt said that there will be coperation for IED's against Indian troops.

am happy as long as this remains the situation.:army:
 
.
Musharraf and help prevent killings of Indians?

He does not care about Indians and Indian Kashmiris either.

He will continue his support to elements that aims to harm us only. I wish Indian leaders are only making small talk when they agree to such dialogues. I hope they too know this means nothing.
 
.
hypocrites are people like you who try to be more mushy than mushy himself. mushy is going wild in giving concessions to india....without even extracting a tiny bit from their side.
No need for ranting my friend; doubt the situation any different if anyone else was in power. From Qazi, to Altaf and right down to Sharif - and even Musharraf - Pakistani politics will remain in shambles; and its not going to change unless the entire system changes. I just find it stupid when folks like you have the nerve to call certain folks sellouts and what not when you probably never did something of any true meaning for your religion or country in your life.
 
. .


asim bro,

i posted this thread and i believe you were the first person to respond to it???

did i say mush was sell out on this issue???? only
invited people to debate....yet this guy abused me without any provacation wotsoever. He has the right to worship mushy....but that doesnot give him or anyone else the right to declare other who want to question/discuss mushy actions as anti-state, anti-pakistan hypocrites.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom