You all the time happy with your status quo power, if India has right to get freedom from Briish, then Kashmir do have the same....these all were non-state actors...of course Pakistan would keep supporting the moral struggle of Kashmiri musl
Human Rights (Kashmir): 27 Jun 2012: Westminster Hall debates - TheyWorkForYou
The report said random DNA testing of the graves would take years since only about 16 labs in India had the capacity to do it.
It could also “attract undesired media attention, cause prolonged trauma to the people and can also act as a trigger point/event for causing serious law and order disturbances,” it said.
The report said no one had taken the government up in its previous offer to undertake DNA tests on specific graves identified by the relatives of those missing.
But Parvez of the families association said it filed a case in
December on behalf of 132 families asking for just that. It filed another 507 cases last month, he
Amnesty International calls for trial of Indian troops
Feb 2012
ISLAMABAD: The Amnesty International, the London-based world human rights organisation, has said that Indian army personnel facing charges of serious violations of human rights must stand trial.
According to Kashmir Media Service, the Amnesty International, citing India’s Supreme Court February 4 order, stated that the Indian army could not invoke the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) to avoid the prosecution of eight officers charged with the March 2000 killing of five Kashmiri villagers at Pathribal.
“We welcome the Supreme Court’s statement that there should be no need to obtain prior approval for prosecuting security personnel charged with having committed grave human rights violations such as rape and murder,” said Sam Zarifi, Amnesty International’s Director on Asia-Pacific in a statement posted on the AI website.
“While the Court’s remark opens the chance for the prosecution of the eight army personnel Amnesty International reiterates its demand for the repeal of the AFSPA, which has been in force in Jammu and Kashmir since 1990,” Sam Zarifi said.
“For far too long, Indian security forces have used the AFSPA as a cover for serious human rights violations. The Supreme Court’s statement should finally allow some light to be shed on some of the army’s most gruesome violations – providing some hope for justice for the victims and a step forward imposing the rule of law,” the AI Director maintained.
The Supreme Court’s statement in the case has pitted the army against India’s premier investigating agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
The Indian armed forces had claimed that the five were Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) guerrillas involved in the shooting of 35 members of the Sikh community at Chhattisingpura in the valley prior to the visit of the then United States’ President Bill Clinton to India in the same month. The CBI’s investigation showed that the five people killed were in fact villagers from Brariangan, Halan and Islamabad town.
“The AFSPA has provisions giving protection to personnel engaged in armed operations in designated areas from any legal proceedings unless it is approved by the Union government,” he said, adding that “this rarely happens in practice, as a result of which these laws have provided impunity for perpetrators of grave human rights violations.”
so sad about our muslim kashmiris, but powers silent on kashmiris...
