Saudis in the audis are hi-tech .. Egyptian airforce = no AWACS-No BVR
Saudi military = Again advanced than Egyptians .. But the Egyptians make up in numbers n training۔
egypt has e2 awacs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Saudis in the audis are hi-tech .. Egyptian airforce = no AWACS-No BVR
Saudi military = Again advanced than Egyptians .. But the Egyptians make up in numbers n training۔
Well, I somewhat agree with your second line, hence I categorized Egypt above KSA. Egypt has a big classic battle-hardened army. I don't know why some people underrate Egyptian army.Saudis in the audis are hi-tech .. Egyptian airforce = no AWACS-No BVR
Saudi military = Again advanced than Egyptians .. But the Egyptians make up in numbers n training۔
Saudis in the audis are hi-tech .. Egyptian airforce = no AWACS-No BVR
Saudi military = Again advanced than Egyptians .. But the Egyptians make up in numbers n training۔
I'm not ranking most powerful armies. Just most capable personnel.
Egypt has large Navy.
I was thinking of placing Algeria in #5. I didn't include ISIS or factions in Syrian war from both sides. For Houthis, the Yemeni army has poor training. And much of army is already in sync with Houthis. Most of their gains are in north and not really in south east.
Their navy's like Iran. Large but useless. Actually, none of Arabic navies are worth mentioning. They heavily rely on western equipment especially in air warfare.
egypt has no meteor missile ... he even finished yet, Algeria has the R-77 a long time. su-30 and higher than the F-16. is nothing uploaded. me just explain what use is your army? the main enemy in the region and israel.meme passing rafa you close the Palestinian.8 E-2C Hawkeye 2000 AWAC, 2 EC-130H CompassCall EW/ELINT , 4 Beechcraft ELINT, 1 Super King Air EW, and also has EW Helicopters Sea King/Mi-8. Mica IR on M2K, AIM-7 variants with beyond visual range capability (although only semi active), procurement of Mig-29M and Rafale (if deal doesn't collapse) will provide R-77 and MicaR/Meteor.
this is your godmother and weak, israel killed nine citizen you and you still talking?
egypt has no meteor missile ... he even finished yet, Algeria has the R-77 a long time. su-30 and higher than the F-16. is nothing uploaded. me just explain what use is your army? the main enemy in the region and israel.meme passing rafa you close the Palestinian.
egypt has no meteor missile ...
. he even finished yet, Algeria has the R-77 a long time. su-30 and higher than the F-16. is nothing uploaded. me just explain what use is your army? the main enemy in the region and israel.meme passing rafa you close the Palestinian.
Didn't say it did. I said if the deal for the Rafale doesn't collapse the EAF will be armed with MBDA missiles.
Your English is unintelligible.
so no need to discuss with you .all the world know what know goI don't need to argue with you on that. Quality and quantity speaks itself.
I use the translators.
yes but nothing is signed yet. are even no negotiation for the burst
so no need to discuss with you .all the world know what know go
You are emotional like always@rmi5
Calm down with your rhetoric. This thread isn't comparing state militaries. It's about quality of soldiers, skills and experience. If we compare militaries no doubt Egypt would top list in Arab world. However that's not purpose of thread.
If you put 3,000 members of those 'midget terrorist groups' against 3,000 Israeli soldiers, everyone knows what end result is. When no Air power is being used they will triumph and that has always been case in past and present. Israeli soldiers are over exaggerated, they never win any gun fight. Their strategy is to not engage in gun fight. It is to draw fire , retreat and call air support. Along with disproportionate shelling against neighborhoods. Obviously that indicates that they are not capable of leading the battlefield. And their battle field commanders aren't up for task. And also their soldiers lack motivation to operate and utilize their skills. Because they are heavily dependent on air power.
If they wanted to minimize civilian casualties and put their training to test it will result in failure for their armed brigades. On other hand those 'midget groups' have no armor, air support or intelligence support'. They purely utilize their skills attained and do it effectively against all odds.
So yes they deserve top spot. Only people who deny reality believe otherwise.
You are welcome to speak Arabic. We speak Arabic too.
You are emotional like always
Terrorists always overrate themselves. In reality, when they are placed in front of armies in a real war(I am not talking about hit and run), they always piss in their pants and fail miserably.
A great example is the big daddy of these midget terrorists which is IRGC of Iran. IRGC supporters always have chest thumpings like they are better than US army. but, in reality, in Iran-Iraq war, every major battle which IRGC was leading independently(about 6.5 last years of war), failed miserably with huge casualties, while all big achievements(Like stopping Iraqi forces, driving them out of Khoramshahr, and vicinity of Abadan, and northwest of khouzestan, and major role in capturing Al-Faw) were done by classic Iranian army.
hhh thank you@rmi5
Calm down with your rhetoric. This thread isn't comparing state militaries. It's about quality of soldiers, skills and experience. If we compare militaries no doubt Egypt would top list in Arab world. However that's not purpose of thread.
If you put 3,000 members of those 'midget terrorist groups' against 3,000 Israeli soldiers, everyone knows what end result is. When no Air power is being used they will triumph and that has always been case in past and present. Israeli soldiers are over exaggerated, they never win any gun fight. Their strategy is to not engage in gun fight. It is to draw fire , retreat and call air support. Along with disproportionate shelling against neighborhoods. Obviously that indicates that they are not capable of leading the battlefield. And their battle field commanders aren't up for task. And also their soldiers lack motivation to operate and utilize their skills. Because they are heavily dependent on air power.
If they wanted to minimize civilian casualties and put their training to test it will result in failure for their armed brigades. On other hand those 'midget groups' have no armor, air support or intelligence support'. They purely utilize their skills attained and do it effectively against all odds.
So yes they deserve top spot. Only people who deny reality believe otherwise.
You are welcome to speak Arabic. We speak Arabic too.
hhh thank you
one can not compare because it is not them same challenges
the Algerian GIS and the best against the TERRORISM.
otherwise I would say hezbollah, is no army capable as Hizbullah
iran is not Arabic, otherwise I would have said the IRGC
New Recruit