Appearance of " AKKOR" Turkish Active Protection System for armoured vehicles

[xenon54 out]

You are just angry and trying to troll..
It doesn't work here.. go cry somewhere else with your friend..

Im still waiting for your source.

 

[Quasar]

For real fans of Pakistan Defence Forum who wants to know more about ASELSAN (Turkish Defence Giant in Global top 100 list) Actice protection system. http://www.aselsan.com.tr/en-us/press-room/Brochures/Electronic-Warfare-Systems/AKKOR_ENG.pdf

 

[The SC]

Im still waiting for your source.

I don't feed trolls.. told you before.. it is very easy to find..

 

[cabatli_53]

It is obvious that you are talking about yourself here.. "subsystems" says it all.. your article does not show anything newer than what is already known.. Russians were the first into APS, transferred tech to South Korea who re-transferred tech to Turkey after developing it.. Turkey develops it further.. what is bad about this.. you are such an ignorant and arrogant newbie.. that your brain is selling you out.. go swallow your arrogant tongue and cry somewhere else..

My friend, Turkey never asked S. Korea to transfer any APS technology to Turkey. The source you shared is about Altay, not about any APS technology.

 

[xenon54 out]

I don't feed trolls.. told you before.. it is very easy to find..

You dont have a source, you just made things up in your mind and now call people who ask for a source trolls, maybe mods should take care of you.

 

[The SC]

My friend, Turkey never asked S. Korea to transfer any APS technology to Turkey. The source you shared is about Altay, not about any APS technology.

My friend.. the source talks about Altay and K2 sharing the same subsystems on top of the canon.. and transfer of technology.. most developing countries are sharing tech between them.. what is bad about it..Just Turkey who does not get ToT?

 

[cabatli_53]

My friend.. the source talks about Altay and K2 sharing the same subsystems on top of the canon.. and transfer of technology.. most developing countries are sharing tech between them.. what is bad about it..Just Turkey who does not get ToT?

Nothing bad about sharing technology between allies. Believe me If there was any, I would have been the first one who tell it on this thread but There is not such a technology cooperation. It is purely about Tank technology consultancy service and selected subsystem exchange on early prototypes.

 

[The SC]

Nothing bad about sharing technology between allies. Believe me If there was any, I would have been the first one who tell it on this thread but There is not such a technology cooperation. It is purely about Tank technology consultancy service and selected subsystem exchange on early prototypes.

I understand what you mean.. the problem resides in the fact that subsystems can mean anything..and it just happens that both Akkor and KPAS look almost the same and act almost the same.. there is no shame about it.. Do you want to tell me that Turkey just invented it?

And since you usually provide sources.. I will share the source about the Russia ToT to South Korea that one of your compatriots is asking for without doing his own search..here you go:

Eastern developments
Russia was the first nation to develop and field an APS - the Drozd system that was employed on a number of T-55AD MBTs from 1983, as well as on some T-80U-M1 MBTs. Drozd is a hard-kill system that relied on unguided 105 mm fragmentation interceptors. Subsequently the Drozd-2 was developed, with this still being marketed but never having entered production for the Russian Army.
A successor, the Arena APS, and its related export version known as Arena-E, was developed in the early 1990s. Using different hard-kill EFP plates, the Arena system is not believed to have entered service with Russian forces, but is understood to have seen some degree of technology transfer or integration work onto the South Korean K2 MBT.

https://ihsmarkit.com/research-analysis/developments-in-active-protection-system-
aps-technologies.html

 

[HannibalBarca]

I understand what you mean.. the problem resides in the fact that subsystems can mean anything..and it just happens that both Akkor and KPAS look almost the same and act almost the same.. there is no shame about it.. Do you want to tell me that Turkey just invented it?

And since you usually provide sources.. I will share the source about the Russia ToT to South Korea that one of your compatriots is asking for without doing his own search..here you go:

Eastern developments
Russia was the first nation to develop and field an APS - the Drozd system that was employed on a number of T-55AD MBTs from 1983, as well as on some T-80U-M1 MBTs. Drozd is a hard-kill system that relied on unguided 105 mm fragmentation interceptors. Subsequently the Drozd-2 was developed, with this still being marketed but never having entered production for the Russian Army.
A successor, the Arena APS, and its related export version known as Arena-E, was developed in the early 1990s. Using different hard-kill EFP plates, the Arena system is not believed to have entered service with Russian forces, but is understood to have seen some degree of technology transfer or integration work onto the South Korean K2 MBT.

https://ihsmarkit.com/research-analysis/developments-in-active-protection-system-
aps-technologies.html

Well if you put your "analysis" on what "look alike"... then Akkor look like Israeli APS sys... not the Korean one...

Trophy

Akkor

 

[Quasar]

And since you usually provide sources.. I will share the source about the Russia ToT to South Korea that one of your compatriots is asking for without doing his own search..here you go:
https://ihsmarkit.com/research-analysis/developments-in-active-protection-system-
aps-technologies.html

bravo!! obviously you have some serious comprehension problems! people are asking source for your claim that Turkish ASELSAN AKKOR is the result of S.Korean ToT!!! it is very simple please qoute any Turkish member here who cared or asked about a source for Russia ToT to South Korea. Otherwise, this makes you a liar! and lies are not honorable. now it became clear that you are just someone to ignore.

 

[The SC]

bravo!! obviously you have some serious comprehension problems! people are asking source for your claim that Turkish ASELSAN AKKOR is the result of S.Korean ToT!!! it is very simple please qoute any Turkish member here who cared or asked about a source for Russia ToT to South Korea. Otherwise, this makes you a liar! and lies are not honorable. now it became clear that you are just someone to ignore.

Good please ignore me,, the is a button on PDF to ignore people like you.. that is what I am going to use right now.. mr honourable liar..

 

[xenon54 out]

I understand what you mean.. the problem resides in the fact that subsystems can mean anything..and it just happens that both Akkor and KPAS look almost the same and act almost the same.. there is no shame about it.. Do you want to tell me that Turkey just invented it?

In which parallel universe do those two look ''almost'' same?

And since you usually provide sources.. I will share the source about the Russia ToT to South Korea that one of your compatriots is asking for without doing his own search..here you go:

Im not asking for Russian ToT to SK, im asking for the source of your claim that AKKOR is South Korean ToT, is that so hard to understand?