APCs,Anti tank tracked & wheeled systems

[Super Falcon]

well i dont see half of these are going to destroy tanks stryer and ot

 

[SyedF]

TOW on Humvee

maybe this a way cheaper method!

Its not a Humvee, its a land rover defender

 

[Manticore]

Combat Vehicle 90 (9040A)

Puma

Anders - combat vehicle version

 

[Manticore]

now that ive looked it up a bit , these vehicles are quite practical !

 

[LeGenD]

Bradley Fighting Vehicle

M1128 Stryker Mobile Gun System

 

[emotionless_teenage]

pretty much everybody messed up with the term 'tank destroyer'.pretty much all picture are IFVs with missile on top of it

a tank destroyer is a specific vehicle which is designed to meet specific role,that is to defeat enemy's heavy armor.i usually has big gun(>90mm),lightly armoured and fast(since mobility>protection in their book).a good example is french ERC-90 sagaie

however the trend for tank destroyer vehicle is pretty much died out anyway.modern warfare demands for vehicle which shares similar basic structure(part commonality and thus reducing cost) but can be upgraded for other tasks.not to mention that the use of ATGM which has better range,accuracy and lethality than cannon shell

 

[emotionless_teenage]

Its not a Humvee, its a land rover defender

and that ain't TOW missile

 

[A.Muqeet khan]

what is it then ?

 

[Capt.Popeye]

what is it then ?

Bakhtar Shikan missile.

 

[Thoma Yosip]

From what I understand, the Stryker MGS is meant as an infantry fire support system, not a tank destroyer. It would be more effective in reducing defended strong points than taking on tanks.

 

[Manticore]

so basically our apc dont come under tank destroyers criteria..

Al-Talha

Al-Sakb

Al-Hadeed

 

[Manticore]

U-416

---------- Post added at 09:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:26 PM ----------

March 2005 Worldwide world news army military Defence industries industry exhibition equipment UK-Army Recognition

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Its not obsolete but the new smart bombs , pose a great danger to all such vehicles from air in absence of SAM in pakistan army

There is lesser chance of head to head battle then a battle involving airforce vs Tanks

We live in an era where one airforce tries to wipe out other , and then goes after tanks from air, and then follow it up with their own tanks ... for decisive advantage ....

It never hurts to not have these missiles / anti tanks just in case you do get a scenario with tank vs tanks on ground

 

[Manticore]

MRAP: Burraq

 

[IND151]

tank destroyers have not become obsolete; at least in subcontinent.

however their importance is reduced.