Any answers from defence experts from all countries?

[Nexus]

There are TTs here with less then a thousand posts and some members with Thousands of posts who are pathalogical Idiots

that's right btw u add my name in list ?

 

[thesolar65]

1. A pre-emptive attack is beyond the capability of most nations
2. It should not make the first move - at all.
3. It can resort to protracted defense - or guerrilla warfare. Overt battles will end in Western victory. Otherwise if there are enough mountains/forests - it can help.
It must hunt for allies - may be a declare a peace conference unilaterally to amicably settle the issue(knowing fully well that they can give nothing) This has a big impact on PR.

But in the end all these will fall short.
The main objective of the West is to topple the Govt. In this case - the present Govt may engineer a coup and establish a 'fake' democracy and 'co-operate'. But this has low chance of success.

IMO - the best is to go out for a PR blitz. Unilaterally submitting to UN inspectors(to buy time)

Is there any country apart from USA and Russia that have real pre-emptive strike capability?

 

[Alpha1]

that's right btw u add my name in list ?

what list???

 

[Nexus]

what list???

group of TTs here with less then a thousand posts and some members with Thousands of posts who are pathalogical Idiots

 

[Alpha1]

group of TTs here with less then a thousand posts and some members with Thousands of posts who are pathalogical Idiots

haha you are not a TT yet

 

[onionkiller]

my dear brother regional and international politics didn't work as you wrote . its dirtiest game on planet earth . sometime i hate borders and names .

best post by you sir g. i like it

 

[SRP]

Is there any country apart from USA and Russia that have real pre-emptive strike capability?

Yes you can name few ones like France, UK, Israel.

Few months ago France bombarded Mali.

 

[thesolar65]

Yes you can name few ones like France, UK, Israel.

Few months ago France bombarded Mali.

But I meant going in to others territory and bomb them!!

 

[SRP]

But I meant going in to others territory and bomb them!!

Mali is not France's territory. They bombed it.

Israel bombed and over ran other Arab countries. Even today they are using same tactics.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Israel They are famous for it. Japan and Germany also ring a bell.

Is there any country apart from USA and Russia that have real pre-emptive strike capability?

 

[T-123456]

You should first look at the reasons why this certain country will be attacked.
The countries you talked about were ''guilty''of something to the international community.
Most were attacked under a UN resolution and not by just one country.

 

[thesolar65]

You should first look at the reasons why this certain country will be attacked.
The countries you talked about were ''guilty''of something to the international community.
Most were attacked under a UN resolution and not by just one country.

My post had nothing to do who is right or wrong. It was purely from military prospective? In this situation what the generals of the attacked country would do?

 

[T-123456]

In that case,they can either try to inflict as much damage as possible to the enemy with precision strikes/operations and force a truce which can lead to negotiations(surrender without loss of face eventually).
Fight till death,no surrender.
Or immidiate surrender to save soldiers lifes.

 

[The SC]

1. A pre-emptive attack is beyond the capability of most nations
2. It should not make the first move - at all.
3. It can resort to protracted defense - or guerrilla warfare. Overt battles will end in Western victory. Otherwise if there are enough mountains/forests - it can help.
It must hunt for allies - may be a declare a peace conference unilaterally to amicably settle the issue(knowing fully well that they can give nothing) This has a big impact on PR.

But in the end all these will fall short.
The main objective of the West is to topple the Govt. In this case - the present Govt may engineer a coup and establish a 'fake' democracy and 'co-operate'. But this has low chance of success.

IMO - the best is to go out for a PR blitz. Unilaterally submitting to UN inspectors(to buy time)

Do like Israel:

1.strike some American warships preemtiively
2.make the first move by all means
3.opt for overt battles (victory will be yours, i.e,: who dares wins), flat terrain and deserts are good too, with a big chance of success.
PR is a must anyhow, and with media control it is a winner on its own ...by way of deception.

Anyone can do all these things even against the US, but first you have to be proactive and have sent a delegation of highly trained men and women in deception technics to the Mark's country... to marry their senators and congressmen daughters and sons, so YOUR grand sons and granddaughters will allow you to do anything to the Mark's country...even destroying it in different ways is possible... since we are talking about 'family ties' here...
Go figure...

 

[anonymus]

There are TTs here with less then a thousand posts and some members with Thousands of posts who are pathalogical Idiots

There are some TT's here who are pathological idiots.

Don't go by labeling.