Which Turks?
Right wing attackers extremely rarely do it out of religious conviction. Most of the time it's about race,political motives and money. But Muslim terror attacks are a different story...
Yeah but you know what they say
one nation,two countries
Which Turks?
Right wing attackers extremely rarely do it out of religious conviction. Most of the time it's about race,political motives and money. But Muslim terror attacks are a different story...
Yeah but you know what they say
Which Turks?
Right wing attackers extremely rarely do it out of religious conviction. Most of the time it's about race,political motives and money. But Muslim terror attacks are a different story...
Yeah but you know what they say
Err...I looked at the link,question is did YOU look at the link? Because majority of European terror is by anarchist-communist groups,mafia,political organizations and neo-nazis. On the other hand,there's Islamic terror that puts religion as the main reason.False. Many are on the basis of religion. Most "Muslim" terror attacks are because of western foreign policy.
Take a look at some top examples; mostly-non Muslims.
Terrorism in Europe - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The first one wasn't and the second was? Both were terrorists.
No I'm not saying that,the whole thing started when Dalit said something about white terrorists attacking mosques and implied that white terrorist attacks on Muslims are far more frequent than Muslim attacks in European countries etc etc. That's how the thread got derailed like that.
Hahahaha. No.
somebody has to state the obvious, so I'll go first:
no no. he has other duties, and in any case has a very narrow vision with only the concern for a few. Khalifa stuff requires a global vision, the vision to lead an Ummah with determination. Only Khan has that. from his Indus Empire he will take care of everything from Palestine to France.
