Aadami ka kya bharosa................
hein ............
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aadami ka kya bharosa................
really....................most of the time(99.9%) divorces are initiated by men only.women seek divorce only in rarest cases when domestic abuse become unbearable.hein ............
Aadami ka kya bharosa................
Shah Bano case gives hope to Muslim women - India News - IBNLive
The Hindu : The Shah Bano legacy
Divorce in any case is not beneficial to any woman unless she is independent financially or if she suffers domestic abuse from husband then divorce is the last resort.problem is one of maintenance from husband.Thats why there is need for uniform divorce law.
didnt you watch Nishabd....Even her husband was like her, what's your point.In old age couple don't like loneliness. Didn't you watch Baghwan.
controversial subject religion is hence everyone tries to skip and just do lipservice. What one need is strong willed got/judiciary which can impose such uniform civil code.That is where the problem lies. When I read the judgement except for making the divorce difficult for men, the court has only provided a lip service in stating that women are equal to men but due to the financial dependency of the South Asian women(it goes for all religions' women), they will not be treated as equals by the chauvinistic south asian men.
To all the unbelievers-
payment of maintenance in Islamic system is covered by "Mahr"-
which btw is an obligation before the "Nikkah" (Marriage)- most of the muslim people of SA mainly Pakistan- Bangladesh- India does not follow this obligation- i say its "cultural" belonging to specific region not religion- it has nothing to do with Religion-
In other Muslim countries- such as Saudi Arabia- other Gulf Countries- Malaysia etc- Deciding "Mahr" before marriage is taken as an obligation-
So i agree with Splurgenxs here- fcuk the Islamist mullahs of SA-
Thats where the problem lies.If woman is a housewife she cant go out and earn for herself.What i think Maintenance is must till she gets remarried.In shah bano's case she was 60 yrs old woman who cant even remarry or seek employment.in such a case she deserves maintenance for life.
Maintenance chahe state de ya hubsband kisi ko to dena hai.Its no way you can leave a divorced female on her fate in a society where majority are housewives and not financially independent.It was a debate in USA that the women who work in house should be paid by the government, since they look after the citizen of the state., in my opinion a muslim state should pay to the house wives...thats a freaking full time job and it takes a hell out of a woman's life to raise children, but then we should also consider aspects like it may lead to materialize relations which should only be cherished with love and care.
The principle is that once the Idat ends the legal relationship that carries duties and rights end with it... however, the legal relationship between the divorced woman and state is still there, therefore, the court should direct govt to allocate a stipend in such cases.
on the other hand second marriage in Islam is advised with prostitute who wants to quit, elderly ladies, handicapped, and those with children especially girls so that the burden is off the shoulders of such ladies... this our society doesnot allow, so I think its local government's responsibility to look after in such cases.
she was 60 yrs when she went to court asking for maintenance and court ruled in her favour.But then iss case ke baad All India Muslim Personal Law Board walon jo hungama machaya to govt. ko separate law pass karna pada.Did shah bano go to the court at the age of above 60 or was it that the Indian court gave a decision 30 years after the first hearing.
The Congress Government, panicky in an election year, caved in under the pressure of the orthodoxy. It enacted the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. The most controversial provision of the Act was that it gave a Muslim woman the right to maintenance for the period of iddat (about three months) after the divorce, and shifted the onus of maintaining her to her relatives or the Wakf Board. The Act was seen as discriminatory as it denied divorced Muslim women the right to basic maintenance which women of other faiths had recourse to under secular law.
didnt you watch Nishabd....
Rare doesnt mean that it dont happen.Even in 1970s who could have expected shah bano going to court for maintenance.But it did happen.Such things are rare in real life.
didnt you watch Nishabd....
controversial subject religion is hence everyone tries to skip and just do lipservice. What one need is strong willed got/judiciary which can impose such uniform civil code.
Maintenance chahe state de ya hubsband kisi ko to dena hai.Its no way you can leave a divorced female on her fate in a society where majority are housewives and not financially independent.