Agree. It always works this way. Only some serving or retired officer can explain to me why their ex-chiefs and other retired generals, who at one time or another were clearly guilty of illegal and unconstitutional acts, are actively defended by the army? Surely a guy like Musharraf who used the army to commit Kargil blunder, and then committed multiple undeniable acts of high treason defined under article 6 for his own personal benefit, why that guy is defended by the army?? Why does ISPR issue petulant statements, expressing disappointment on court ruling of an open and shut case, who are they to say anything?
And any trial or accountability that does happen, only happens a decade or two after the fact, enough time for the old guard to step out and the new to replace the old. Case in point, the 1990 election rigging case was finally ruled on in 2012, Musharraf's verdict was given in 2019 etc. If that pattern is remotely accurate or suggestive, then we'll see what happened in 2011 come out some time around 2030, what happened around 2014-15 come out after the mid 2030s, and if anything is to be said about today and the previous elections, it might be around 2040.
.
