Ancient Nuclear War in Pakistan [VIDEO]

[curioususer]

Then we go to mohenjo daro and find only 44 skeletons.

I respect your opinion brother, but i'd like to disagree with you with this part. Mahabharata was not fought only by 44 people. Thousands of people took part. It's just that we managed to find 44 skeletons.

War mentioned in Mahabharata happened in Kurukshetra, Haryana. Not in Mohenjo-Daro, so even if 44 skeletons are found in Mohenjo-Daro it doesn't anything.

 

[Dushmann]

Why they call it Pakistan? It should be India or at least 'Ancient India'.

And Mahabharat is not exactly an holy book although it has some religious significance.

 

[Sugarcane]

Why they call it Pakistan? It should be India or at least 'Ancient India'.

And Mahabharat is not exactly an holy book although it has some religious significance.

Because India has nothing to do with IVC except some bordering areas with Pakistan. Even name of your country "India" is illegal

 

[Dushmann]

Because India has nothing to do with IVC except some bordering areas with Pakistan. Even name of your country "India" is illegal

Just because some Indian land was given to Pakistan does not mean Pakistan gets to claim history too. Arabs have nothing to do with Indus valley civilization. Pashtuns I can understand if they claim, because Pakhtas were ancient peripheral Indian tribe.

 

[PARAS]

There is a reference from Ramayan as well.
Ancient Weapons of Mass Destruction & The Mahabharata

Watch from 2:00 min

Ancient Nuclear warfare debunked . Watch the entire video !

 

[Sugarcane]

Just because some Indian land was given to Pakistan does not mean Pakistan gets to claim history too. Arabs have nothing to do with Indus valley civilization. Pashtuns I can understand if they claim, because Pakhtas were ancient peripheral Indian tribe.

Which Indian Land and given to whom? And Pashtun is Indian tribe??

 

[MilSpec]

This claiming of history arguments have always perplexed me.... Boundaries drawn 70 odd years ago wanting to lay claim to 3500 years of history....

 

[PARAS]

Because India has nothing to do with IVC except some bordering areas with Pakistan. Even name of your country "India" is illegal

Look at this map of Indus Valley civilization . Modern India has a major chunk of IVC .

And why is name of India illegal ? If you are severely agonized by this name , you can always rename your country as western India .

 

[Dushmann]

Which Indian Land and given to whom? And Pashtun is Indian tribe??

North-west India given to self proclaimed Arabs/Turks.
Like people of North-west India were converted just few hundred years ago (although this argument can not be be used to claim Indian history as they themselves have declared they are NOT Indian.), Buddhist people of Afghanistan were also converted by barbaric Turkic nomads. It's just that it happened too long ago so they have lost old identities and became cut off from mainland Indian culture for nearly thousand years. I know now their culture has changed significantly and I am not calling them Indians. Just saying that it's OK if they want to identify with IVC because their ancestors were a peripheral Indian tribe. But Pakistanis can not claim it because their ancestor is claimed by themselves to be Mohammed Bin Quasim- an Arab teenage barbarian.

 

[Sugarcane]

Look at this map of Indus Valley civilization . Modern India has a major chunk of IVC .

And why is name of India illegal ? If you are severely agonized by this name , you can always rename your country as western India .

That's not major chunk - IVC originated in today's Pakistan and have foot print in Bharat.

North-west India given to self proclaimed Arabs/Turks.
Like people of North-west India were converted just few hundred years ago (although this argument can not be be used to claim Indian history as they themselves have declared they are NOT Indian.), Buddhist people of Afghanistan were also converted by barbaric Turkic nomads. It's just that it happened too long ago so they have lost old identities and became cut off from mainland Indian culture for nearly thousand years. I know now their culture has changed significantly and I am not calling them Indians. Just saying that it's OK if they want to identify with IVC because their ancestors were a peripheral Indian tribe. But Pakistanis can not claim it because their ancestor is claimed by themselves to be Mohammed Bin Quasim- an Arab teenage barbarian.

Your history knowledge is screwed up like majority Internet Hindus

 

[FaujHistorian]

North-west India given to self proclaimed Arabs/Turks.
Like people of North-west India were converted just few hundred years ago (although this argument can not be be used to claim Indian history as they themselves have declared they are NOT Indian.), Buddhist people of Afghanistan were also converted by barbaric Turkic nomads. It's just that it happened too long ago so they have lost old identities and became cut off from mainland Indian culture for nearly thousand years. I know now their culture has changed significantly and I am not calling them Indians. Just saying that it's OK if they want to identify with IVC because their ancestors were a peripheral Indian tribe. But Pakistanis can not claim it because their ancestor is claimed by themselves to be Mohammed Bin Quasim- an Arab teenage barbarian.

C'mon dear.

Do not behave as if you just got out of 3rd grade history class from a sarkari shcool.


Nobody gave anything except in Punjab (where exchange took place)..



Just because you are a Hindu doesn't mean you own the whole subcontinent.

Just worry about your little apartment. That should be it.


If you insist on "giving away" land,

then be prepared to accept that before 1947 everyone had the same right on this land regardless of their religion or ethnicity.

I urge you not be a pompous @ss just because you graduated from 3rd grade.

Learn a bit more, and go beyond 3rd grade, go beyond it.


peace

 

[PARAS]

That's not major chunk - IVC originated in today's Pakistan and have foot print in Bharat.

Dude , according to the map almost one-third of IVC lies in India and still you say that's not a major part. Out of the 12 major sites of IVC , 4 are in Bharat . There is no cure of your delusions mate.

 

[FaujHistorian]

Dude , according to the map almost one-third of IVC lies in India and still you say that's not a major part. Out of the 12 major sites of IVC , 4 are in Bharat . There is no cure of your delusions mate.

Not sure why we are even having this discussion.

There are two major civilization areas in the subcontinent.

IVC- Indus valley civilization
GVC- Ganga valley civilization

They have distinct traits, cultures, languages, and histories (and even religions).



If you share traditions hopes and dreams of Indus valley (Sindh, Balchistan, Punjab, KPK, Kashmir), then you are part of IVC,

If on the other hand you happen to be part of traditions, cultures, hopes, dreams of central India, then you are part of the GVC (Ganga valley civilization).

Be proud of who YOU are,

no need to get into this endless IVC-vs.-GVD quarrels.


Thank you

 

[Sugarcane]

Dude , according to the map almost one-third of IVC lies in India and still you say that's not a major part. Out of the 12 major sites of IVC , 4 are in Bharat . There is no cure of your delusions mate.

Those 4 sites are not the main cities of IVC but still that so called 1/3 area is tiny part of bharat - but you will not give your habit of stealing history.

 

[PARAS]

Those 4 sites are not the main cities of IVC but still that so called 1/3 area is tiny part of bharat - but you will not give your habit of stealing history.

Man there is no end to your delusions and excuses . These 12 are the most important sites of IVC thats why they are on the map . Many sites haven't been shown like Lothal , Gujarat which was the main seaport of IVC people . And part of IVC India has is a tiny part of total Indian territory but a very big area of Indus Valley civilization .

No one is stealing anything. I am just saying that IVC is joint heritage of India and Pakistan .

This is a list of all the IVC sites . And guess what , most of them are in India

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indus_Valley_Civilization_sites