Sina-1
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
- Messages
- 1,019
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
I didn’t say those replies were class act, now did IReally?! Go back and read posts #52 and #55 (page 4) and see how much "class" there was on display ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn’t say those replies were class act, now did IReally?! Go back and read posts #52 and #55 (page 4) and see how much "class" there was on display ...
Patriot defense system is offered with a single radar system to a potential customer (standard package), but it can be made to take cues from multiple radar systems if necessary. YOU can equip a Patriot defense system with multiple MPQ-53 radar systems or multiple MPQ-65 radar systems. In fact, Patriot defense systems can be made to take cues from different types of radar systems if necessary.
Establishing a credible defense, is a matter of professional understanding of these matters. This understanding cannot be bought with money from any company.
All I would say is that this is a wakeup call for KSA. Their incompetence and lack of strategic depth is becoming apparent to all.
I just reminded them that American hardware delivers "in capable hands."
"In capable hands" being the key term.
To be fair to the Saudis, I think they never imagined that Iran will be bod enough to attack them in their own mainland, and their largest oil refinery at that. That's not an excuse for then though. Since a country should always be ready for any eventuality. Especially in a conflict zone like the middle East where KSA and Iran are engaged in a proxy war of supremacy in the region. So the Saudis should have been prepared at all times. I agree that it was incompetent on their part .The oil refinery in question is/was not shielded by any variant of Patriot defense system, period. I was wrong about the 'near' part though, but these systems were not active at the time of attack which is also an important consideration (reportedly out of magazine). Saudi negligence is the primary issue here.
Give a donkey an AK47 and it won't make any difference.
Actually I don't think Iran even needed to do this to prevent war, since KSA never had any intention of attacking iran's mainland this brazenly. Since they know this can escalate things over the extent to which they will like to and as I said in another threat KSA being a wealthy prosperous country has more to lose in a situation of war than Iran. I suppose leaders in Tehran are also aware of this. Coupled with the fact that the US is not keen to get involved in another war after the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Had Iraq war never happened then I think the US would have long reacted to attacks like this to be honest. However things are different today.Don't worry bro ... we did this to prevent war ... but people have no wisdom to understand
aa bail mujhay maar... @PakSwordThese systems used in this attack were as much Russia as the american tomohawk is. The were fully Iranian tech.
These were some simpler Iranian tech given to these proxies in this attack. This was also to send a message to the saudis. "If our proxies with these relatively simpler Iranian tech can do this to you, just imagine what Iran itself will do".
Your daddy USA (your offspring) is 150 years old while Iran is thousands years old.Had Iraq war never happened then I think the US would have long reacted to attacks like this to be honest. However things are different today.
Told you that Iran is a menace.. Yesterday an Iranian was arrested form Baluchistan and large cache of arms was recovered from an underground bunker. For what purpose it was there?aa bail mujhay maar... @PakSword
Well, a lot of scenarios are possible. Iran can also send her experts to Yemen along with the weapons and fire from there on KSA.More likely than not it was done by Iran itself. Houthis are just a diversion to shed blame from Iran but still keeping the ace of spade in Iran's hands, the USA knows it was Iran and Iran knows it that the USA knows.
And where is the evidence for this claim? or are you pulling claims out of your behind?
Next time, don't open your gob if you're clueless.
This attack came from Iranian proxies in Iraq. Only someone devoid of any logic would believe this was done by Israel.
ran has proven its missile accuracy greatly in the past couple of years. Most recently by hitting a kurdish meeting room in a pinpoint manner.
say it allIt is clear to us that Iran bears responsibility for this attack. There is no other plausible explanation. We support ongoing investigations to establish further details.
Citing no evidence, the statement surprisingly appeals to there supposedly being "no other plausible explanation" — despite many possibilities being documented by analysts and international publications.
Right, because Iran could not use GLONASS etc and it has to use its own satellites
These are ballistic missiles, what does an aircraft have to do with anything? are you high?
That's because you live in a fantasy world where American systems are infallible. The fact is, this attack by Iran showed just how limited some their systems are. In this case, their PAC-3
@AmirPatriot described it very nicely in his blog.
No, it's just a matter of having enough IQ to know that Israel somehow getting it's hand on dozens of Iranian made hardware and launching it from 1000's of km away to do this attack is too much of a stretch compared to simply going by the obvious fact that there is ample evidence these attack came form Iran/Iraq area. If you truly lack the cognitive ability to realise this, then this is your problem.
Like I said, figures that you're pulling from your behind.
I told you to watch the video from the actual expert. At least you'll learn something other than making yourself look like an utter ignoramus.
من اخر نفهمیدم کی زد ... اگر ایران زده چرا؟Not for nothing has Iran been called a “drone superpower”.
The drone attacks in Saudi Arabia have changed the nature of global warfare | The Independent
the US forces in the Gulf did not know what was happening until it was all over.
Excuses advanced for this failure include the drones flying too low to be detected and unfairly coming from a direction different from the one that might have been expected. Such explanations sound pathetic when set against the proud boasts of the arms manufacturers and military commanders about the effectiveness of their weapons systems.
If the US and Saudi Arabia are particularly hesitant to retaliate against Iran it is because they know now, contrary to what they might have believed a year ago, that a counter-attack will not be a cost-free exercise. What happened before can happen again: not for nothing has Iran been called a “drone superpower”. Oil production facilities and the desalination plants providing much of the fresh water in Saudi Arabia (plus all U.S bases and all U.S floating cans) are conveniently concentrated targets for drones and small missiles.
(He forgot to mention U.S bases and floating cans)