What's new

Analysis of IAF Airpower vs PLAAF Airpower

Guys let me make myself clear

I know China is a military super power in the making .

I know they have close to 1000 modern 4gen fighters ie j10 j11.j16 su30 and su27

They have two dozen j20 .but in Tibet theatre they have 157 fighters.im.saying they will need more to decimate Indian air power. They can do it I know

But well see what happens

:lol::lol:
THEY HAVE OVER 700 4TH AND 4.5TH GEN JETS YOU INDIOT 300+ J10 AND STILL IN PRODUCTION THEY HAVE ALSO 500 J11/SU27/30/J16 YOU FOOL


I know and India has on paper at least

400 su30 mki mig29 and mirage2000.

So they can at least put up a good fight

And make this a very expensive war for China. Hopefully they the chinease will.see its not worth the loss of men materials potential economic loss and massive international reputation damage
 
.
Guys let me make myself clear

I know China is a military super power in the making .

I know they have close to 1000 modern 4gen fighters ie j10 j11.j16 su30 and su27

They have two dozen j20 .but in Tibet theatre they have 157 fighters.im.saying they will need more to decimate Indian air power. They can do it I know

But well see what happens




I know and India has on paper at least

400 su30 mki mig29 and mirage2000.

So they can at least put up a good fight

And make this a very expensive war for China. Hopefully they the chinease will.see its not worth the loss of men materials potential economic loss and massive international reputation damage


right but how can you assume that china can only partially mobilize its military since they have to cover other fronts but your entire military is readily available can be mobilized to one spot. dont u have to cover ur front with pakistan, i assume nepal too

Since on paper u pretty much wrote the entire indian air force inventory
 
.
What Hype? It could not shoot down any aircraft from that distance. What it showed however was that PAF pilots did not want to come any where close to get a better shot at IAF planes in turn wasting a few super expensive BVRs. India's training is different, we don't fire and hope something gets hit.

Can you explain "Indian Electronic Warfare efforts" with proof please. Only one side displayed all its cards that day. The other side kept everything close to its chest.
PAF was not taking its chances - very simple. SU-30 MKI had joined the BATTLE from your side, and it was logical for PAF to use whatever means necessary to break their formation and force them to retreat. BVR engagement capabilities of F-16 MLU came in handy for the needful.

One of the SU-30 MKI was struck - what became of it is open to debate. Your leadership is lacking in honesty and geopolitical acumen - not OUR fault.

Additional SU-30 MKI were under lock as well but were let go. This is all you may need to know.
 
.
What Hype? It could not shoot down any aircraft from that distance. What it showed however was that PAF pilots did not want to come any where close to get a better shot at IAF planes in turn wasting a few super expensive BVRs. India's training is different, we don't fire and hope something gets hit.

you’re right your training doesn’t teach u to fire, it teaches you to get shot down
 
.
The number of Chinese ACs in Tibet is 157 as per the OP's claim however what number would IAF commit against China if an Air war ensues, keeping in mind Pakistani angle?
Also Chinese have S-300 in Tibet and new satellite images indicate their cyber & electronic warfare systems being installed near LAC.
 
.
They have two dozen j20 .but in Tibet theatre they have 157 fighters.im.saying they will need more to decimate Indian air power. They can do it I know

But well see what happens
But this was just land skirmish you want a war with China and why not IAF used by India at laddakh
And rest of your blabbering is worth nothing because your false EGO can't accept the facts 20 Indian soldiers were dead and none of Chinese soldiers were dead in laddakh no international news sources reported it
 
.
right but how can you assume that china can only partially mobilize its military since they have to cover other fronts but your entire military is readily available can be mobilized to one spot. dont u have to cover ur front with pakistan, i assume nepal too

Since on paper u pretty much wrote the entire indian air force inventory


We have allocated 200 fighters to the north mix of su30mki mig29 jags and mirage.thsts about one third of the fleet
I think been much closer to himlayers we could bring more assets inthink into nor5h if desired.

No offence we are not overly concerned about Pakistan or nepal..their attack threat capability is limited .
 
.
We have allocated 200 fighters to the north mix of su30mki mig29 jags and mirage.thsts about one third of the fleet
I think been much closer to himlayers we could bring more assets inthink into nor5h if desired.

No offence we are not overly concerned about Pakistan or nepal..their attack threat capability is limited .
This shows you nothing knows about military tactics against your enemy
 
.
Your leadership is lacking in honesty
Says the side whose Prime Minster claimed two pilots caught, one dead and then only one pilot caught! A side that was ridiculed for heavily edited videos, so edited that a child could have probably done it better. Anyway that was honesty for one side.
Additional SU-30 MKI were under lock as well but were let go. This is all you may need to know.
Actually, I do know that is how you fight.
 
.
Says the side whose Prime Minster claimed two pilots caught, one dead and then only one pilot caught! A side that was ridiculed for heavily edited videos, so edited that a child could have probably done it better. Anyway that was honesty for one side.
Where our PM claims that 2 pilots were caught?? its DGISPR claim that, and he was receiving multiple news from multiple sources (simultaneously) so it could be a mistake and as you claims where were the wreckage of our F-16, there were MIG-21 crash videos/pics within hours of incident and also govt or military can't hide family and friends of a down pilot from media and also Lockheed Martin personals are in the Pakistani airbases where our F-16 were stationed, they counted our F-6, hence pentagon confirmed NO PAKISTANI F-16 WERE MISSING
GET OUT OF YOUR DELUSIONAL YOU INDIOT

Actually, I do know that is how you fight.
you know nothing but come here only for troll
YOU'RE BIGGEST MESS/THREAT FOR THE PEACE OF SUBCONTINENT
JAY TERRORIST HIND
 
. .

Watch at 1:12 minutes. Yes fog of war all the way to your PM.
and its technically impossible to shoot down F-16 with vintage MIG-21 how your MIG-21 was undetected by our AWACS/ long range ground based radars as well as F-16 radars does your Mig-21 had a cloaking device on it??? and why our F-16 was force to engage with your videc/out of this universe MI-21 in WITHIN VISUAL RANGE BATTLE OVER LOC??? GIVE ME THESE ANSWER OF MINE YOU TROLL and he is just quoting what is DGISPR saying
 
.
This is about plaaf v India in himlayers
They have the technical edge I agree
But in the theatre alone we have enough to maintain air detterance I hope
Still.scary facing a proper air force
 
.
This is about plaaf v India in himlayers
They have the technical edge I agree
But in the theatre alone we have enough to maintain air detterance I hope
Still.scary facing a proper air force
Their most fighter jets are being equipped with AESA/ long range SD-10A/PL-15 and what do you have???? conventional radars basic R-77/Derby with a range of 80/10 km range respectively
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom