ExtraOdinary
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2013
- Messages
- 3,354
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
I have been following Christine Fair for quite some time. She used to be a Pro-Pakistani, seems to have changed sides now
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very, very unlikely.
Kashmiris have had enough of being made pawns and substitutes for other people's desire for revenge.
It is critical that we keep steady under fire, take our casualties and not react foolishly.
But sir all the outfits like LeT are proclaiming that they will renew their "jihad" from 2014 onward. Every Pakistani poster claims that he or she has it on good authority, from sources within the military and the government, that Pakistan's situation will improve drastically after 2014. Afghanistan will be brought back into the fold and then there will be an opportunity to renew their struggle. What is your take on all of these factors? Do you see Afghanistan falling to Pakistani proxies and its blow back in Kashmir? If not then pardon me for requesting some substantiation.
I have been following Christine Fair for quite some time. She used to be a Pro-Pakistani, seems to have changed sides now
But sir all the outfits like LeT are proclaiming that they will renew their "jihad" from 2014 onward. Every Pakistani poster claims that he or she has it on good authority, from sources within the military and the government, that Pakistan's situation will improve drastically after 2014. Afghanistan will be brought back into the fold and then there will be an opportunity to renew their struggle. What is your take on all of these factors? Do you see Afghanistan falling to Pakistani proxies and its blow back in Kashmir? If not then pardon me for requesting some substantiation.
The chance of blow back in Kashmir is low though they exist. The Indian army is infinitely better placed to deal with any enhanced attempts at infiltration. However the more important point is that India is likely to make sure that the militants have plenty of fighting that they can do in Afghanistan & border areas of Pakistan, something that should keep them occupied for quite some time. After all, Pakistan is the "buffer", about time we used it as such.
But sir all the outfits like LeT are proclaiming that they will renew their "jihad" from 2014 onward. Every Pakistani poster claims that he or she has it on good authority, from sources within the military and the government, that Pakistan's situation will improve drastically after 2014. Afghanistan will be brought back into the fold and then there will be an opportunity to renew their struggle. What is your take on all of these factors? Do you see Afghanistan falling to Pakistani proxies and its blow back in Kashmir? If not then pardon me for requesting some substantiation.
This is the scary part. One of my biggest worries is if the BJP gets to power & someone like Modi becomes PM with all the expectations now and is stymied on every domestic policy front by the nature of the coalition, there will be a great danger of showing "strength" externally by responding to an act of provocation when a better course of action might be to remain conservative & wait for, as you suggested, a burn out to happen. Best course of action is to deal with Pakistan in such circumstances by exploiting internal fissures but that doesn't do much for political showmanship and that might be what is deemed necessary to shore up a "strong" image. There is something like "the image owning you". Scary that.
Sir, while you may be correct in your observation but I have one too in this regard.
Saying simply that you fear that Modi will try to showcase himself a strong politician given certain circumstances does not seem to be very plausible. For instance, he had been the ridicule of many kind of attacks, personally and politically. We never saw him loose control and make tit for tat statements. It might be due to his aspirations of the highest office in the recent times. However, nothing stopped him to do that before and after the riots.
So, I can't think he will not go into such base tactics but then again you never know. Rahul might do something like you suggest to show he is strong which he is desperately trying to achieve and seems clearly far away from it.
Someone who is capable of sacrificing so many lives in order to shore up his political position is capable of going to any length for the sake of a bigger chair. He is a Musharraf analogue, clever about tactics, bankrupt about strategy and free of any moral constraint.
Sir, you maybe right as always but I think that he has been the centre of so much attention that if he really was as guilty as you put him to be, something might have come up against him despite all the judiciary and the central govt. going after him.
I feel a lot of propaganda has been out out but then are we with all the facts to go any which way?