What's new

Analysis: India drops MBI gas pipeline

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Analysis: India drops MBI gas pipeline

By KUSHAL JEENA
UPI Energy Correspondent

NEW DELHI, July 11 (UPI) -- As Myanmar becomes more influenced by the Chinese, New Delhi has dropped the much-hyped Myanmar-Bangladesh-India gas pipeline project, intensifying the energy battle in Southeast Asia.

"Myanmar is taking India for a ride on gas supply from its fields despite the fact that two Indian state-run companies control 30 percent stake there," said N. Janardhan Reddy, chairman of an Indian Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. "And its growing closeness to China has forced India to drop plans to lay a gas pipeline from Myanmar via Bangladesh."

The move has further intensified the struggle to acquire energy resources in the Southeast Asian region.

The Reddy committee has sought to learn the status of the more than $2 billion gas pipeline project. The government, in its response to the committee's query, said no significant progress has been made in the project since a January 2005 trilateral meeting between the oil ministers of the three partnering nations.

After the meeting, a techno-commercial working committee of representatives from the three countries was formed. The group prepared a draft agreement for which approval had been delayed on account of differences between India and Bangladesh and Myanmar's preference for China in dealing with energy exports.

The 180-mile MBI gas pipeline has been hitting roadblocks since its inception. India was initially very keen on the completion of this pipeline, especially as uncertainty was setting in regarding the fate of the $7 billion Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline.

Bangladesh issued the first blow to the MBI pipeline project, demanding a transit fee and free gas connectivity for its cities along the pipeline. India rejected the demands, claiming it is not economically viable and began exploring the option of a pipeline through Northeastern Indian states bypassing Bangladesh.

Bangladesh, in retaliation, rejected the tri-nation gas pipeline project and said it was negotiating with Myanmar for a direct pipeline, which would be shorter and less expensive. The major setback India received was when Myanmar announced it was going to sell gas to China and lay a pipeline with its communist neighbor.

Myanmar invited bids for a gas pipeline from its A-1 and A-3 blocs. The state-controlled Gas Authority of India Ltd. submitted a bid in September 2006. Following the bid, Myanmar asked for a bid for purchase of 3.5 million metric tons per annum of liquefied natural gas. GAIL again submitted a bid.

The issue was discussed during a visit of an Indian delegation to Myanmar recently. Yangon, during the course of discussion, indicated that it would like to earmark a portion of the 4.8 trillion available cubic feet to meet domestic requirements and put the rest up for export.

The military junta government of Myanmar, however, backed-out of its assurance and announced it would sell the gas from A-1 and A-3 blocs to China's national oil company CNPC. Indian authorities say the bid from China was taken as result of growing Chinese influence on Myanmar's energy sector and China's keen interest Myanmar's gas supplies, resulting in a further intensified battle for oil and gas resources in Southeast Asia.

"Besides, Myanmar's decision to prefer China over India to do oil and gas export business, the unwillingness of Bangladesh to provide transit has forced New Delhi to explore other options before it is too late," said Anand Kumar, a senior energy analyst.

Bangladesh, which stands to earn substantial transit fees of $125 million per year, has set conditions, including the creation of corridors through India to carry out trade with other neighbors like Nepal and Bhutan.

New Delhi has offered to give cash for the quantity of gas Yangon would sell to it from its current surplus. Myanmar has an estimated surplus of 200,000 tons. India is also willing to lift the gas supplies within nine months of the deal being finalized.

By bringing Myanmar on board, China has once again beat out India in the competition for acquiring oil and gas blocs abroad and also in the gas pipeline business. This has come as a major blow to the Indian energy strategy. It has been working hard to sign agreements with oil and gas-rich countries to meet rising power demand, as most of the Indian power plants are gas-based and currently either closed or running half their capacity.

Myanmar and China's partnership is also being viewed as a blow to India's "Look East" foreign policy, which was envisaged during President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam's last visit to Yangon in 2006 when India reiterated its commitment to strengthen its relations with countries in the region. India has formulated an energy diplomacy strategy under which it has plans to get as much as gas from the South and Southeast Asian nations as it can.

http://www.upi.com/Energy/Analysis/2007/07/11/analysis_india_drops_mbi_gas_pipeline/7319/
 
. .
Neo this was reported sometime back. I still rememebr watching the news on TV. However dragon's financial and diplomatic muscle has outwitted India in more occassion than once.

China is strongly building up Oil field portfolio around the world . They have an advantage over others as they engage ' dark regimes ' in Africa by dollying out financial and military aid.
 
.
We got the money from the oilfields and instead of the gas, how the hell does it matter?
 
.
We got the money from the oilfields and instead of the gas, how the hell does it matter?

It does matter. If India fails to secure its gas and oil supplies now with these weaker nations, as years go by you will have to negotiate with stronger powers on much unfavourable conditions.
 
.
I believe there was some work done after this event happened/article was written. India had extended a pretty comprehensive military package to Burma to help it fight the rebels in the west. This was considered as a big step away from India's moral support for the democratic revolution there.
 
.
Neo this was reported sometime back. I still rememebr watching the news on TV. However dragon's financial and diplomatic muscle has outwitted India in more occassion than once. China is strongly building up Oil field portfolio around the world . They have an advantage over others as they engage ' dark regimes ' in Africa by dollying out financial and military aid.

Actually the news may be old but India has been badgering Bangladesh to allow transit of the gas pipeline across its territory but Dhaka has been reluctant because of security considerations. I think that India should stop blaming the Chinese and smaller neighbours as India's attitude does not help much. In matters of regional cooperation, security and trade, India is its own worst enemy.
 
.
Actually the news may be old but India has been badgering Bangladesh to allow transit of the gas pipeline across its territory but Dhaka has been reluctant because of security considerations.


What are those security considerations.

I think that India should stop blaming the Chinese and smaller neighbours as India's attitude does not help much. In matters of regional cooperation, security and trade, India is its own worst enemy.

Where is India blaming? Where did u read that? or is it another fiction?
 
.
Makes me laugh when i look at these kinds of fights for gas and oil.even though the choices offered to us by alternative technologies are beyond any politician can imagine.instead of fighting for pollution creating technologies.
if south Asian countries were to concentrate on solar and wind tech.(just like the Europeans)we wont need any gas or oil for our use at all.but the funniest thing is most countries will wait for west to take a lead in that field.
Then we will spend billions buying the same thing from them.not surprising no politician in south Asian countries have the brains to look for the long term solution and not just follow the west.
most Western countries don't have sun through out the year.so they are going wind and slower or combined.but they aren't going at it fast enough as they don't get to see the sun as much As south Asian countries do.

Denmark generates about 30% of its electricity from wind power, and turbine manufacturing is a top export industry, employing 20,000 people. Denmark's success with wind power is due to the commitment and investment of its citizens.

How Wind Power Works
The 29 metre-long blades of the wind turbine captures wind, which then turns rotors to produce electricity. Wind is a renewable energy source and is a resource that cannot be depleted. Wind turbines produce no air pollution, no water pollution, and use very little land. They are safe for birds and generate little noise.
The wind turbine at the Exhibition Place:

produces up to 1000 megawatt hours of electricity annually (enough to light 250 homes)
displaces up to 272 tonnes of carbon dioxide annually equivalent to:


59 Passenger cars not driven for one year
49 Passenger cars and light trucks not driven for one year
25,816 Gallons of gasoline
633 US Barrels of oil
3.65 Tanker trucks filled with gasoline
6,974 Number of tree seedlings grown for 10 years
227 Acres of pine or fir forests storing carbon for one year
2.23 Acres of forest preserved from deforestation
11,333 Propane cylinders used for home barbeques
1.38 Railcars of coal burned
92 Tons of waste recycled instead of landfilled


spins at about 21 times per minute
stands 94 metres tall (30 storeys tall)

The turbine will generate an average of 1,400 megawatt hours of power per year, equivalent to the electricity needs of about 250 homes.
The turbine will help displace some of the harmful chemicals that are responsible for smog and acid rain.
Specifications:

This unit is a 750 kW, direct drive, model LW 52 wind turbine(newer units comming on the market every day)
The wind turbine is 94 metres high, or roughly 30 storeys
It weighs approximately 121,000 kilograms
Each of its three blades measure 24 metres in length
The blades rotate at approximately 27 rpm, or 11 metres per second
The turbine produces about 128 kilowatts in winds of 10-12 knots per hour
It cost = $1.3 million

Like it or not this is the future.

India china or Pakistan and others needs gas to fire up there power stations.they are willing to spend billions for an out dated source .that after spending millions will eventually run out.nuclear powers stations will leave waste that cannot be treated and stays contaminated for 1000 years or longer.
 
.
Cheetah, your reply is refreshingly constructive, rather than the usual pissing contest we finally have somebody going sensible.Repped u.

Thinking out of the box is a totally laien thing for us, not only piliticians even for the masses. I read somewhere probably in the economics thread that Pakistan is investing into wind power. India is lareasy the second largest producer of non-conventional power or wind power. We havea compnay called Suzlon which is thes econd largest in this field.
We have to nurture them, these sorts of companies and innovations needs govt support, funding and awareness among public.
 
. .
I wasn't aware of it Joey, the issue still pops up in the new every now and then.
I guess its official now.

It shows India's inabiltiy to get things done in its own neighbourhood, doesnt bode well for a ' future power player '.
 
.
What are those security considerations.

Your North-East insurgency targeting Bangladesh and the MBI pipeline if it had been built. This could have made things difficult for BD and we were right to reject the proposal.
 
.
Your North-East insurgency targeting Bangladesh and the MBI pipeline if it had been built. This could have made things difficult for BD and we were right to reject the proposal.


And the reason for rejecting muli-million dollar TATA project ??
:disagree:
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom