I never claimed to know more arabic than you. As in surah it is clearly being said to tell to kufar and you left those words out so I pointed to that.
The point remains, for muslims Quran and Sunnah are source and when you go for an opinion you go to the experts.
Sunnat ki koi 100% guarantee nahi hai ke woh hadithon main hi milay, contrary to what Abu Basit ranted, I have not rejected the hadith, just reduced them from the divine status.
They are written by man. You have to read what they say then make up your own mind if they make sense as per what is said in the Quran.
For example in the entire Quran you will not find a single Ayat against Music. Hadith are full of them. Contradiction! In some ahadith, the Prophet enjoyed some music, in some he was furious to hear the music. What is going on here?
Quran is without contradiction. It in fact is the only book that goes as far as to challenge you to find a contradiction in it.
{Then do they not reflect upon the Qur'an? If it had been from other than Allah, they would have found within it much contradiction. (4.82)}
Anywhere in the Quran Allah has taken his guarantee to preserve Hadith?
One fundamental mistake that well, fundamentalists, make is that they hang on to the notion that how things happened in 1400 years ago can happen today too.
1400 years ago the society was deeply flawed. As is the case humanity has improved itself and now if you want to apply the same rules as is, its an impossibility that you're demanding out of the humans. Quran is constant, its interpretation is not. Allah guaranteed that the Quran won't change - not how humans would interpret it.
People automatically assume that a secularist has an anti-Islam agenda. This has been a common problem in Pakistan, people can't speak up for freedom without such an insinuation being leveled onto them. A person can be a namaazi parhez gaar person, woh uska fail hai, but he can also fight and die for the rights of others to live freely. Uski namaazein bhi khuda ke liay hain, iblees ke liay nahi.
