now that is untrue. while i am not religious and do not personally agree with many things about such revivalist movements, you can't say there is a dischord between science and religion because there are many scientific facts in the quran about our planet and life on earth such as the explanation of water cycle, development of foetus and birth of babies, shape of the earth, the vastness of the universe etc etc. besides this religion played a most crucial role in the developments humanity made in science in the earlier days, since muslim scholars promoted education and were very good at maths and astronomy, besides map making. i speak about islam only because i know of these facts, and im sure other religions and cultures have similarly contributed to our better understanding of natural sciences.
I believe in religion for sure. But these attempts at examining the Quran as a scientific book are simply misleading. Have you considered the possibility that most of these "scientific facts" that you mentioned here may have been said (for lack of a better word. Revealed for wahee perhaps?) to glorify the creator? And not as scientific revelations? Or that they were already known at that time?
Mixing religion with science leads to pseudo science and brilliant ideas like squeezing electricity out of jins. Or claims that some Hindu god performed a head transplant thousands of years ago.