Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@AZ:
You need to read the interview again. I wont explain this to you.
so called restrictions ......... The fact is we are going to obey these restrictions in the same manner as we did in the past during the wars.
2 questions:
1) Why do you call them so-called restrictions? Have you checked the inside of these jets to prove this brave pilot a liar?
2) What restrictions has PAF ignored and in what wars?
I won't be surprised if you choose to not reply with a factual answer. I have seen your past comments.
One question.
How PAF would use Block 52's fitted with CFT and AMRAAM against Taliban in Mohmand agency?
By the way I am yet to find anything new in this interview. About Block 52's and the so called restrictions attached with it isn't it we have already discussed it a dozen times on times on this thread. Wonder why some non Pakistanis are trying to make moot points out of it. The fact is we are going to obey these restrictions in the same manner as we did in the past during the wars. Anyways block 52's fitted with CFT's and aim120c's would definitely be used against Taliban and Al Qaeda. I believe that.
Thats why they(USA) using their own technicians and supporting staff for your F16s ?????
Some people said that air field in their control
On one hand you have an interview with a pilot ,who says the new vipers are just bonus aircraft,to be used against the taliban and on the other hand we know that pakistan paid 5 billions for blk 52s ,500 AMRAAMS ?JDams ,Sniper pods,all these for fighting militants ,if we were so worried about fighting the militants why didnt we buy CAS aircraft or maybe gunships .Why?????
If Pakistan's purchase was really for fighting the taliban,then why did the indians whine about the f-16 deal???.If you ask me this interview is a load of bull**** ,it isnt logical for a country to buy weopens that wont work in war.