Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes I agree. If you look at the western tanks like the Abrams, Leopards and even the Merkavas, they're all over 60 tonnes.47 tonnes for MBT is less. The fascination for lighter tanks should end
Yr Abraham is junk. It failed miserably in Pakistan in late 80s.Yes I agree. If you look at the western tanks like the Abrams, Leopards and even the Merkavas, they're all over 60 tonnes.
Thats not the only reason. Like i said 3 main points are there when a tank is judged upon. Its fire report was proved to be inferior then basic T-59 tanks as u may have seen that in WSJ's We are Soldiers. But it wasnt the only reason.^^
Abrams was not selected on firing accuracy issues, T-59 was found to have better accuracy. weight was not a factor.
I have seen we are soldiers and i can see why u said it in first place because i had guessed that u may have watched it.^^
If weight was an issue then Leclerc in UAE, Merkava in isarel, M1 in KSA and Egypt would not make sense. USA wouldnt be fielding M1 in gulf wars.
visit the series "we were soldiers" in armour episode and you would know why M1 wasnt chosen.
lol thats all u have come up with? or perhaps yr australian residence making u think that western weaponry is somewhat superior! since yr not physically connected to Pakistan and its terrains as well as climate.^^
Your statements are based on general views of what you think about western armies and their tanks. I was hoping for some solid points to move ahead.
personal assumptions are all what you came up with. I won't even bother replying to your senseless crappy assumptions but do Try not to make any personal attack or I will report you to admins.lol thats all u have come up with? or perhaps yr australian residence making u think that western weaponry is somewhat superior! since yr not physically connected to Pakistan and its terrains as well as climate.
The western weapons and the tech of 21 century or the weapons available since 80s are not quit good or very advance, simply because the other nations have now caught them in technology. Now their uniqueness is no more. That technology was the base of their claims of having superior weaponry.
Go get some knowledge then come.
lol those arent personal assumptions thats why i shared sources in which numerous senior members and TTs said the same. Its not me but u who is stuck with his impressions. Visit the sources to know.....personal assumptions are all what you came up with. I won't even bother replying to your senseless crappy assumptions but do Try not to make any personal attack or I will report you to admins.
Stop wasting time here try to find some one from HIT and get info on AK-2 and its current statuslol those arent personal assumptions thats why i shared sources in which numerous senior members and TTs said the same. Its not me but u who is stuck with his impressions. Visit the sources to know.....
lol those arent personal assumptions thats why i shared sources in which numerous senior members and TTs said the same. Its not me but u who is stuck with his impressions. Visit the sources to know.....
lol u also have comprehension problems.Zarvan gave perfect reply to you above, go figure. I cant waste time with you any more, no solid points till now. adios.