What's new

Amid Tensions With Saudi Arabia, Grim News for Iran’s Economy

BLACKEAGLE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 9, 2007
Messages
10,919
Reaction score
2
Country
Jordan
Location
Jordan
  • By Mark Dubowitz
BN-LY784_irande_G_20160105051046.jpg

People in Tehran on Monday protest Saudi Arabia’s execution of Shiite cleric Nemer al-Nemer over the weekend.
Ahmad Halabisaz/Xinhua via Zuma Press
The devolution in relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran could easily evolve into an economic war—with the advantage to Riyadh.

The Saudis and Iranians are longtime rivals for regional dominance. They are fighting proxy wars in Syria and Iraq, as well as in Yemen, with the Sunni kingdom leading the military campaign against the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels. Amid the conflicts outside its borders, Saudi Arabia has been cracking down on dissent from restive Shiite citizens. It executed a prominent Shiite cleric, Nemer al-Nemer, on Saturday, along with 46 others–mostly Sunnis–accused of participating in al-Qaeda terrorist attacks in the kingdom.

After Iranians protesting the sheikh’s execution set fire to the Saudi embassy in Tehran, the Saudi government severed diplomatic and commercial relations with Iran and banned citizens from traveling there. Saudi allies Bahrain and Sudan have also cut diplomatic ties with Iran; the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait have withdrawn their ambassadors from Tehran. Tensions are high, and the Saudis have their own long-term financial concerns–the kingdom has been running deficits and cutting back on government subsidies–but still have strong advantages to deploy against Iran.

As Congress targeted Iranian oil exports with sanctions between 2011 and 2013, Saudi Arabia increased its oil production to head off a spike in prices–a critical step. Iranian oil sales fell from 2.5 million barrels per day to about 1 million by the end of 2013, and its oil production plunged from 3.7 million barrels per day in 2011 to 2.8 million in November 2013. Oil prices have declined precipitously, which meant that sanctions hit Iran’s economy all the harder.

The crippling effect of the sanctions contributed to Iran’s willingness to make the deal with global powers last year over its nuclear program. Iranian officials are banking on sanctions relief facilitating a return to oil markets and massive foreign energy investment, both of which would help rescue its battered economy and soothe a frustrated population.

That’s part of the reason Saudi Arabia opposed the nuclear deal. Together with increased U.S. shale production, the recent spike in Saudi oil production–from 9.6 million barrels per day in November 2014 to 10.2 million barrels per day one year later–has ensured that Iran will return to a depressed global oil market. Crude oil prices are around $37 a barrel, roughly a third of the rate when sanctions were imposed in January 2013. Tehran would have to sell about 7.5 million barrels a day to return to pre-sanctions revenue levels. That’s well beyond the 1.8 million barrels per day in sales and the 3.4 million to 3.6 million barrels per day in production that the International Energy Agency estimates that Tehran could reach within six months of sanctions being lifted.

And those projections may be optimistic if European and Asian energy companies slow-walk their investments in Iran’s energy infrastructure, which is badly damaged from the loss of capital and technology driven away by Western sanctions. So long as Riyadh is willing to run budget deficits to keep oil prices low, Tehran will get only about half of the oil price to which it pegged its budget last year.

Another economic weapon Saudi Arabia can deploy involves its hundreds of billions of dollars in overseas foreign holdings. The Saudis have significant influence at foreign banks and with foreign investors and could threaten to pull funds from entities doing business with Iran. Many institutions already worry that sanctions enforcement will become more aggressive after the Obama presidency ends. A Saudi threat could keep them further sidelined.

Through the nuclear deal, Iran found a way to free itself from U.S. and European economic pressures. But the Saudis have their own instruments of economic warfare. Whatever happens next, the fiscal picture for Iran could quickly become more grim.

Mark Dubowitz is executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and head of its Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance. He is on Twitter: @MDubowitz.
Amid Tensions With Saudi Arabia, Grim News for Iran’s Economy - Washington Wire - WSJ
 
.
The situation especially became disturbing for Iran after Djibuti and Somali cut ties with Iran today. Although UK opened embassy in Tehran several days ago and there's a traffic in Tehran due to the increasing travels of numerous officials of variouse European and important Asian countries to increase economic ties, but still...
 
.
The situation especially became disturbing for Iran after Djibuti and Somali cut ties with Iran today. Although UK opened embassy in Tehran several days ago and there's a traffic in Tehran due to the increasing travels of numerous officials of variouse European and important Asian countries to increase economic ties, but still...

Good for you, there's nothing wrong with trade/cooperation with the West. Same way as there isn't wrong with trade with China/Asia. West is forced to trade with them too. World is global, there is no humiliation behind creating such ties. Only some childish bigots here will present it as some 'victory against Muslims'. Now the point is, hopefully Iran will end it's anti-Arab agenda if its economy improves it won't have need to open up any fronts in Arab world. Because these fronts such as in Yemen are done so West has less cards to play at the negotiating table. Iran fears if it didn't have big role in conflicts such as Yemen, Iraq or Syria that West will force it to concede many of its rights in order to get removal of sanctions. Now hopefully there won't be a need. And tensions with Arabs will deescalate.

This will have impact on your culture though, Iranians will embrace the secular global culture. Kind of in same way that happened to UAE. Some might like this, some don't. I believe in a moderate balance of both religious and secular. But that is your peoples business.
 
.
The situation especially became disturbing for Iran after Djibuti and Somali cut ties with Iran today. Although UK opened embassy in Tehran several days ago and there's a traffic in Tehran due to the increasing travels of numerous officials of variouse European and important Asian countries to increase economic ties, but still...
Did you read the article to begin with?
 
.
Good for you, there's nothing wrong with trade/cooperation with the West. Same way as there isn't wrong with trade with China/Asia. West is forced to trade with them too. World is global, there is no humiliation behind creating such ties. Only some childish bigots here will present it as some 'victory against Muslims'. Now the point is, hopefully Iran will end it's anti-Arab agenda if its economy improves it won't have need to open up any fronts in Arab world. Because these fronts such as in Yemen are done so West has less cards to play at the negotiating table. Iran fears if it didn't have big role in conflicts such as Yemen, Iraq or Syria that West will force it to concede many of its rights in order to get removal of sanctions. Now hopefully there won't be a need. And tensions with Arabs will deescalate.

This will have impact on your culture though, Iranians will embrace the secular global culture. Kind of in same way that happened to UAE. Some might like this, some don't. I believe in a moderate balance of both religious and secular. But that is your peoples business.

How can Iran have an anti-arab agenda if its strongest allies are Hezbollah (Arab), Syria (Arab), and Iraq (Arab). It's politically supports the Palestinians (Arab) and the Yemenis (Arab). It also has good relationships with countries like Oman (Arab). And during Egypt's (Arab) MB government, relationship between the two was warming up.
 
. .
How can Iran have an anti-arab agenda if its strongest allies are Hezbollah (Arab), Syria (Arab), and Iraq (Arab). It's politically supports the Palestinians (Arab) and the Yemenis (Arab). It also has good relationships with countries like Oman (Arab). And during Egypt's (Arab) MB government, relationship between the two was warming up.

Iran sees those as Arabs as Shia crescent. Oman is a country that is neutral to all affairs and the people there don't want to experience any political strife. The relations with Palestinians are not strong anymore. I've explained to the motives that drove Iran to support the Palestinians in the past. I don't want to repeat myself. But nowadays its not important factor anymore to the strategic/national interests of Iran. It was mostly beneficial for influential/popular reasons. After the Syrian conflict it doesn't work anymore. Al Jazeera has one on one interviews about this exact thing where Shia and Sunni analysts debate over it. You should watch them.
 
.
Iran sees those as Arabs as Shia crescent. Oman is a country that is neutral to all affairs and the people there don't want to experience any political strife. The relations with Palestinians are not strong anymore. I've explained to the motives that drove Iran to support the Palestinians in the past. I don't want to repeat myself. But nowadays its not important factor anymore to the strategic/national interests of Iran. It was mostly beneficial for influential/popular reasons. After the Syrian conflict it doesn't work anymore. Al Jazeera has one on one interviews about this exact thing where Shia and Sunni analysts debate over it. You should watch them.

Can you link the interview?
 
. .
Iran sees those as Arabs as Shia crescent. Oman is a country that is neutral to all affairs and the people there don't want to experience any political strife. The relations with Palestinians are not strong anymore. I've explained to the motives that drove Iran to support the Palestinians in the past. I don't want to repeat myself. But nowadays its not important factor anymore to the strategic/national interests of Iran. It was mostly beneficial for influential/popular reasons. After the Syrian conflict it doesn't work anymore. Al Jazeera has one on one interviews about this exact thing where Shia and Sunni analysts debate over it. You should watch them.

So then it is not anti-arab agenda. First of all, you say that they are supporting shia which even if true, means its not anti-arab since those guys are Arab, even if shia. And if their support for Palestine was only for show, then it would mean they wanted Arab support which a country that is anti-arab won't do.
 
.
I've been saying since long time ago, that if I was an Iranian I would pray for soon fall of Assad. because every month of Assad rule costs Iran about half billion $.
 
. .
No pilgrim will waste his/her money in KSA.no more humanitarian aid to Somali and Sudan.also economic ties with UAE and Qatar stay fine.

There's nothing to worry about.
 
.
Iranian clergy with their religious rehotric have created an aura of false heroism around them which stops them from making rational and sane political decisions and this is slowly pushing Iran into a political suicide.
 
.
No pilgrim will waste his/her money in KSA.no more humanitarian aid to Somali and Sudan.also economic ties with UAE and Qatar stay fine.

There's nothing to worry about.
No Iranians in Mecca means less riots and problems.

Any Iranian aid lost can be replaced by more Saudi aid.

UAE and Qatar relations with Iran will be severed as soon as Iran escalates the situation with KSA. As seen from the recent demonstration.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom