gambit
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,569
- Reaction score
- 148
- Country
- Location
How? By broadening the base conditions upon every comparison must stand upon. If you broaden that base enough, Perry, you, and I can be compared to the Taliban simply by being bipedal symmetrical. Broadening the base condition often includes widening the applicable contexts of words. The goal is weave and cast a rhetorical net that is as large as possible. This is a tactic usually employed by those who have a specific target in mind that must be placed in the same category as something else but the person doing the comparison could not find anything reasonably common between the two items.The title of the article is misleading. How come people like Rick Perry can be compared to the likes of the Taliban? How? I don't understand.
But religious reasons have plenty to do with this. We do not conduct our lives in a moral and intellectual vacuum. Everything must have some kind of justification. Even hunger is a justification for an action: eating. Religion is a moral foundation that highly influences our actions, usually in interactions with each other. In every community, and a family unit is a community, there must be a leader whose decisions must be binding on all members inside this community: head of household. The more informed the members and the more participatory allowance they have, the longer it will take for a decision to be reached and the less binding it will be upon the members of this community. So what else but religious justifications as the most convenient to use to keep women compliant and obedient?What does having being barefoot, pregnant and ignorant have to do with anything?
It's not because of religion. It is because of lack of education. If one has no education, he/she automatically becomes backward - religion or no religion.