What's new

Altered trade route strikes provincialism chord

Leader

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
29,159
Reaction score
9
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Altered trade route strikes provincialism chord

As Pakistan decides to change the Pak-China Economic Corridor route by cutting off restive areas en route to Gwadar port, the Senate joint opposition has demanded the government seek approval of the new alignment from the Council of Common Interests (CCI).

The reason behind changing the route is aimed at ensuring security for Chinese convoys and so most of the route will go through Punjab, which has irked lawmakers from Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan.

The issue of re-alignment of the Gwadar connectivity road came in the limelight during a meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Finance held on Wednesday to review the budgetary recommendations of the upper house of Parliament.

The committee adopted the recommendation of the joint opposition in the Senate, asking the government to seek the approval of the new route – what the government calls the eastern route of the Pak-China Economic Corridor – from the Council of Common Interests (CCI), the highest constitutional body that deals with inter-provincial issues. The old route was along the western lines of the country but passes through some restive areas.

Senators hailing from K-P and Balochistan said the new alignment has excluded many areas of their provinces as the new route largely passes through Punjab.

Pakistan and China have agreed to construct the economic corridor that will give access to western parts of China to Gwadar port for international trade and secure energy supplies for the future. The new route is much safer than the old one and will ensure security of traffic.

Both the countries have signed initial agreements for a $34-billion investment in Pakistan.

Planning and Development Secretary Hasan Nawaz Tarar opposed the proposal that seeks the CCI nod and maintained that the corridor was being built under a bilateral arrangement; hence there is no need for seeking CCI’s approval.

Meanwhile, Senator Sardar Fateh Muhammad said the government changed the original Gwadar connectivity route and excluded the Pashtun and Baloch belts, about which Balochistan has reservations.

Minister for Planning and Development Ahsan Iqbal urged the nation to avoid provoking sentiments of provincialism, warning it could hurt the national development agenda. He said the government has not abandoned the original route, called the western route. It has only decided to construct the eastern route first with Chinese assistance.

Senator Ilyas Bilour said the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman told him that the government claimed of changing the route on China’s desire. However, when Maulana Fazl met the Chinese Ambassador in Pakistan, the latter ruled out Beijing’s pressure to change the route.

The planning secretary said the corridor will be built on new lines after China refused to finance the other route.

Ahsan Iqbal informed the standing committee that both the countries have agreed to build the corridor along the eastern alignment. He said the eastern route will largely be completed on a build-operate-transfer (BOT) basis – a facility that was not available to construct the western route. He said had the government adopted the old western route, the entire cost of construction would have fallen on the shoulders of Pakistan.

He said the eastern route will be completed via a combination of BOT, concessionary loans from China and limited government financing. He said the government has not abandoned the original route, which passes through western parts of the country.

Senator Talha Mehmood argued that the government was not fully exploiting the opportunity, suggesting it should seek maximum benefits in return of giving access to China.

Ahsan Iqbal replied that since China was Pakistan’s friend, the government cannot exploit the situation. He said Pakistan will also be benefiting from the corridor and the arrangement is a win-win situation for both countries.

He said the $34-billion investment in the next five years will also be a benchmark for other countries for future cooperation. The planning minister said Pakistan tried to sell the western route to China but Beijing was interested in the eastern alignment.
 
Last edited:
.
I don't know what they expected, its miracle China is investing in easter route let alone in western router.
 
.
its a tricky issue to deal with. If you ignore the western route, the more deprived they become. But if you dont ignore the western route, you loose all the investment.

the only way to work on the western route is via self financing and using FWO. It does have long term benefits in terms of equitable distribution of wealth, however, its a risky task to undertake in the current scenario.
 
. .
is this the new proposed route?

Pakistan-China.jpg


it is very punjab biased. and also exposed to indians incase of war
 
.
The easiest fix would be to provide ample highway infrastructure to connect to the main route. It makes sense, there is no point in making a 2 lane or 4 lane motorway when there is no one there to use it. Balochistan is sparsely population. Makran Coastal Highway is two lane, one lane for each direction of travel. However, most of the time it is still empty as there is hardly anyone using it, except for perhaps trade from Iran. Gwader, Jiwani, Pasni, Ormara these are all small fishing towns.
 
. . . . .
it even ignores the southern punjab...

What is Southern Punjab? Please explain...

@Topic

Connecting Multan from Gwadar was the better choice. but i don't know why KPK is jumping, even before they were getting nothing out of this route other then refurbishing silk route, which is still there. Main loser in new route is Baluchistan, while gainer is Sindh. There is no change for Punjab.
 
.
its a tricky issue to deal with. If you ignore the western route, the more deprived they become. But if you dont ignore the western route, you loose all the investment.

the only way to work on the western route is via self financing and using FWO. It does have long term benefits in terms of equitable distribution of wealth, however, its a risky task to undertake in the current scenario.


I Have A Better Idea, Start Feasibility For Deep Seaport At Jiwani(A Gwadar 2.0) and Road and Rail Links Covering The Western Route From There.At The Same Time Develop The Eastern Route and Get The Trade Corridor Started With China.Once People See The Massive Profits These Corridors Generate They Will Definitely Want To Invest.Then Offer Jiwani Deep Seaport and The Road and Railway Corridors Through The Western Route To Global Investors on BOT Basis.


Did You Know That In 1996 More Than 40 Companies Offered To Develop Gwadar Port on BOT.Just Imagine How Many Companies Will Want To Invest Now and What Mouth Watering Offers They Would Have For Our Country.Indeed They Would Offer The World For These Lucrative Trade Routes
 
.
is this the new proposed route?

Pakistan-China.jpg


it is very punjab biased. and also exposed to indians incase of war





Yes This Is The New Route Of Pakistan China Economic Corridor.The Original Trade and Energy Corridor Under Musharraf Envisioned The Western Route.I Think Even Nawaz Sharif Would Have Gone For The Western Route But The Law and Order Situation Makes It Risky(Great Job Bugti You Just Deprived The Very People Whose Cause You Champion)
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom