This is my first post here (except for the hello! one), so go easy
Also - hello everyone!
Now - back to the subject, AFAIK the situation is this ;
- SSM actually tasked TURMOSAN with an engine development for the Altay MBT but they failed mainly because of souring relations between the EU and Turkey.
- After this SSM started a tender regarding a multipurpose engine family development. Otokar was repeatedly asked to bid but unfortunately declined. BMC won this tender and is boasting a family up to 5000 HP. We'll see but I'm not optimistic.
- Apart from this there are also projects to develop UAV engines (which has already bared fruit for the ANKA), helicopter engines, missile and rocket engines (mainly for cruise missiles if i'm not mistaken?), jet fighter engines and finally commercial jet engines (which I've read are the hardest to develop?).
- One would expect the Altay MBT serial production and engine development to be unlinked at this point - but in a surprising (ehm..) move SSM decided to add "engine development" as a "must" to the tender rules. I'm speculating now but that kind of makes BMC as the sole supplier as neither Otokar nor FNSS has the capability to bid with this prerequisite in place. I'm guessing that SSM wanted to somehow punish Otokar for repeatedly snubbing engine development for the TAF when they where the most likely to succeed when you take into account their engineering past.
Now, about these three bidders ;
Otokar
I actually agree with SSM on this. While Otokar has overseen development for the Altay tank it was not their project to begin with. The parameters were set by SSM, most electronic systems were developed by Aselsan and the engineering was transferred from South Korea. This doesn't mean that they didn't have an important role to fill nor that they failed to measure up on the task. But it also doesn't mean that Otokar dreamed up the project, asked SSM to fill the requisiteries and created a new tank. The project was SSM's to begin with and
Otokar was paid to audit it while also contribute to the engineering. Nothing more - nothing less.
With all her engineering capabilities Otokar has not once took a risk and developed an engine nor a critical compotent for the TAF. There are conspiracy theories that the Ford partnership they have holds them back and they don't want to risk angering the Americans. Personally I believe they're just plain old greedy and would not risk an R&D project when they can just pop up an assembly line and be rewarded for it. Sound familiar?
FNSS
The amount of support FNSS gets on military forums is unbalanced hugely. Like Otokar they've not done anything special apart from slapping on a chasis on imported technology and sold the product to the TAF. Please correct me if I'm wrong but the info I've managed to gather points me in this direction. They're also not a %100 Turkish company, %49 of her shares are owned by BAE. Which is fine by me but isn't this the main point BMC get's slack for?
BMC
Like the other two they haven't done anything special either. What they have done is win a bid specifically designed for them (engine contract) and get the tank contract as a reward. They're half owned by Qataris and they are also going to start a company with Rheinmetall to help with the Tank production. Nothing special about them so far and I wouldn't expect them to do anything else if the SSM hadn't pushed them.
Verdict
As you can see all 3 bidders are equally greedy capitalist companies (as they should be). IMO SSM was "nudged" by our very emotional president to "punish" Otokar (this is pure speculation by me btw). I think SSM should have awarded a contract for the 3 companies and speed up the project instead of awarding just one as non of them has done anything to be "awarded" for.
But I also think that people are overreacting and supporting these companies as if any of them has lifted a finger for this country - they haven't.
If you want examples of companies that actually risked their own money look at Vestel with Karayel. While they should've produced a small UAV to accompany their tactical one (as they were asked to do by the SSM) - they still developed a great UAV wholly knowing it might not be bought at all. Now they're looking for exports.
Look at Baykar. Yes SSM awarded them with contracts but each product they've come up with is generally over specification and delivered way under time. They are the original company that took risks when giants of the industry snubbed the TAF. These guys are true patriots in my book. But being linked with Erdoğan has put a stint on their image and everyone hates them for it. Really sad imo. Now they're working on a jet engine model UAV with the SSM's help. The difference though is the project was dreamed up by Baykar and SSM is helping. Nothing like the Altay MBT where it was pushed onto Otokar to manage it while being paid.
Just my 2cents... or looking back at those paragraphs 20 bucks?
Please feel free to correct my mistakes if you see them. I might be mistaken about some of the facts while researching them.
Regards, me